11 hours ago, Social Media said:

Republicans are pushing for an inquiry into Hunter Biden's business dealings.

I bet Uncle Joe is feeling a little nervous right now...

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

 

House Oversight chair admits GOP can’t back up Biden bribery accusations

Devon Archer said the opposite of what Republicans claimed

It is true, Archer said, that in December 2015, Zlochevsky and Burisma were under a lot of pressure. But Shokin was not a cause of that pressure, he testified — Shokin was an asset.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/devon-archer-transcript-biden/

 

Democrats release evidence they claim contradicts Biden bribery allegations - including Burisma head insisting 'no one' at his company had contact with Joe while Hunter was on the board
The transcripts came from a 2019 interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the head of Burisma
In the interview, Zlochevsky told an associate of Rudy Giuliani: 'No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12248315/Burisma-head-insisted-no-one-company-contact-Joe-Biden-Hunter-board.html

 

 

Ex-Hunter Biden associate Devon Archer testifies President Biden didn't discuss 'commercial business': 

Archer testified that Joe Biden's interactions with Hunter Biden's associates were "not related to commercial business," that Joe Biden had no involvement with Burisma, the Ukrainian oil conglomerate on whose board both Archer and Hunter Biden served; that the elder Biden never took any actions to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden; and that Hunter Biden never asked his father to take any actions that would help his clients, according to the fully transcribed interview with the committee.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-committee-releases-devon-archer-transcript/story?id=101986082#:~:text=Archer testified that Joe Biden's,actions to benefit Burisma or

 

House Oversight chair admits GOP can’t back up Biden bribery accusations

The chairman of the House Oversight Committee on Monday said he and his colleagues still lack evidence proving that President Joe Biden took bribes while he was vice president during the Obama administration, despite months of investigation into his son, Hunter Biden.

Representative James Comer made the embarrassing admission during an appearance on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s eponymous nightly programme alongside Representative Jim Jordan, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/james-comer-biden-bribe-accusation-fox-news-b2386040.html

 

Why would Zlochevsky actually admit that Burisma ever had any contacts with Biden?

 

So, not dissolved.  The rest just re-spun by pro Biden media narrative. Thanks anyway.

2 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

And that's why I wrote close to the top of the government. You know, as close as father and son. Although Trump supporters appear to be accusing the father, as that's convenient to them.

That is probably because there is evidence and proof about Trump to which he adds daily.

 

OTOH there is no evidence or proof about President Biden.

 

Hunter Biden, yes but on completely different charges.

Just now, BangkokReady said:

I bet Uncle Joe is feeling a little nervous right now...

Since that's a bet that can't be won or lost, it's pointless.

11 hours ago, Tug said:

that being said it is sad they have been hounding the guy for 5 years now

Of course, the Dems would never spend years hound any conservative politicians or their families... ????

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Please share with us what your crystal ball is telling you.

His crystal ball is saying that massive amounts of evidence is coming soon. All we have to do is wait.

 

But he always says that, and he has not come up with anything yet.

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Of course, the Dems would never spend years hound any conservative politicians or their families... ????

Is Hunter a politician or ex-government official?

10 hours ago, placeholder said:

Funny but empty. Like lots of right wingers here you seem to believe that

absence of evidence = evidence

And a lot of left wingers here believe that they can wish evidence away by pretending it isn't there...

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Of course, the Dems would never spend years hound any conservative politicians or their families... ????

When did that happen? You mean like investigating the Clintons for 7 years kind of hounding?

10 hours ago, ozimoron said:

10 hours ago, nauseus said:

The evidence is being collected and prepared according to the GOP oversight committee statements. That despite apparent obstruction from DOJ, FBI etc.  

 

https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-justice-department-attempting-a-biden-family-coverup/

But none has been disclosed. Why not?

Because it's being collected and prepared?

33 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Occam's razor - there never was any there there.

And how can that be proven?

Just now, BangkokReady said:

Because it's being collected and prepared?

555. If it existed it would have been in the press like a shot out of a gun. LOL.

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

When did that happen?

You don't know which politician and his family the Dems spent years hounding?

Just now, nauseus said:

And how can that be proven?

Dem's are wondering how the GOP will prove anything.

Just now, ozimoron said:

555. If it existed it would have been in the press like a shot out of a gun. LOL.

Or it will be seen once it has been collected and prepared... ????

Just now, BangkokReady said:

You don't know which politician and his family the Dems spent years hounding?

No.

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Since that's a bet that can't be won or lost, it's pointless.

Did you think I was trying to place a real bet, by commenting on ASEAN Now?  Are you OK?

36 minutes ago, illisdean said:

What other crimes. FARA?

You should read the various statements by the GOP committees, Trump, etc... They are very creative and versatile so I cannot really follow-up all their claims.

Edited August 12, 20232 yr by candide

10 minutes ago, candide said:

13 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Of course, the Dems would never spend years hound any conservative politicians or their families... ????

Is Hunter a politician or ex-government official?

"or their families" ????

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

You don't know which politician and his family the Dems spent years hounding?

The 'Biden Biddys' control this site and won't hear a word said against him or his son.

 

They attack like a pack of soi dogs.

 

Totally one eyed but oblivious.

 

Weird choice of guys to put on a pedestal but TiT

 

5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

No.

Wow.  I knew you didn't know much about this topic, but...  ????

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

"or their families" ????

Their (well, 'his') familly members have been appointed as government officials by their daddy.

1 minute ago, ICU Kid said:

The 'Biden Biddys' control this site and won't hear a word said against him or his son.

 

They attack like a pack of soi dogs.

 

Totally one eyed but oblivious.

 

Weird choice of guys to put on a pedestal but TiT

He's from their tribe.  He can do no wrong.  Any mention of any wrongdoing must be silenced. 

 

They're the "good guys" and the other tribe is the bad guys. so they can do what they want to keep their tribe safe and in power.  The truth is irrelevant.

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Wow.  I knew you didn't know much about this topic, but...  ????

Oh, you're still pushing the QANON narrative that the Dems control the FBI?

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Oh, you're still pushing the QANON narrative that the Dems control the FBI?

Still?  What are you talking about?  I haven't sad anything about "QANON" now, nor have I ever done.

 

You have to lie, because you're scared by the truth and have nothing to say against it.  Shame.

Some off topic posts contravening our Community Standards have been removed.

29 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

555. If it existed it would have been in the press like a shot out of a gun. LOL.

What? the NYT???  555

Just now, nauseus said:

What? the NYT???  555

Any press. Not even the far right bile like TS have published any evidence. It's always in still coming mode. That keeps the faithful, well faithful.

31 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Dem's are wondering how the GOP will prove anything.

Looking for tips I guess.

Just now, nauseus said:

Looking for tips I guess.

Must be, they already found plenty of trolls.