1 hour ago, ignore it said:

Like sending a pimp to chaperone your sister.

Like calling someone a pimp who has no history of selling sexual services.

6 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Dunno, I haven't seen any evidence yet.

Impeachment only requires 2/3's vote of House & Senate ( aka Congress) to impeachment, regardless of any evidence. 

Here's my prediction: Hunter Biden will be found innocent of all charges, and he'll be nominated for sainthood.

6 hours ago, nauseus said:

Weiss is the last person that should be appointed SC (unless your name is Bide

SC is appointed by DOJ, not the POTUS. 

It was Deputy DOJ AG Barr who appointed Robert Mueller as SC in 2017, not POTUS Trump. 

DOJ Barr appointed John Durham as SC to investigate origins of FBI's look into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The authority of the DOJ did not change with POTUS Biden. 

3 hours ago, heybruce said:

The tragic comedy of politics in the US now:  People elect those that are the most entertaining, not the most competent.  Not always, but way to often.

 

Of course I'm not saying that's what happened in Marjorie Taylor Greene's case...... 

Well, that's certainly true of your most recently elected Clown-in Chief.

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Only one of the 2 who are or were at the very top are facing criminal charges.

For now.

31 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

SC is appointed by DOJ, not the POTUS. 

It was Deputy DOJ AG Barr who appointed Robert Mueller as SC in 2017, not POTUS Trump. 

DOJ Barr appointed John Durham as SC to investigate origins of FBI's look into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The authority of the DOJ did not change with POTUS Biden. 

I know. What are you on about?

7 hours ago, ozimoron said:

But none has been disclosed. Why not?

Take a full tour of the link.

3 hours ago, placeholder said:

3 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

What a great country! Those in or close to the top of government related to both parties facing a multitude of criminal charges.

Only one of the 2 who are or were at the very top are facing criminal charges.

And that's why I wrote close to the top of the government. You know, as close as father and son. Although Trump supporters appear to be accusing the father, as that's convenient to them.

special people to investigate special people with the outcome already known...illegal,no...morally corrupt,yes.

If the bloke broke laws let him pay. Pure and simple. 

 

If this is inflated by the right, as it has reported by the middle and left leaning press and the Democrats as being done, and for a long time i.e. that his crimes are used as an attempt to distraction from what Trump has been accused of doing (projection).

 

The evidence touted in the J6 and other election issues, if true, is treason.

 

If the Biden family as conspired to commit crimes then they too are in need of conviction and serious penalty.

 

To conflate that somehow the Biden family are worse-than, akin-to the Trump family and what appears as massive frauds and criminal wrong doings by the Trumps and imminently to be tabled openly in court with evidences to prove said criminal activity then we may be seeing a panicked right, a panicked Trump and his family, in league with the GOP. which has seemingly given away integrity to both sedition and treason making an argument based on a junkies madness as being connected to his father and wider family as a means to distract, to tar, through disinformation and misinformation in order to somehow derail the prosecutions of Trump, to sway the electorate and win power, and all through their sedition and sycophancy disguised and 'True Patriotism'.

 

We know for certain that the Trump orbit confesses regularly through their obvious projections onto the Biden's and anyone who opposes their treason.  

 

Poor sick Biden Jnr has been an atypical train wreck as a long time struggling to get clean junkie on the madness-making meth, and no wonder.

 

Trading on his family name like a wild animal trying to survive is not so far apart from what we see in open US politics ala Cruz, Hawley, Greene, and yes even Democrats. 

So to bash him (apart from making him answer to the law if he has broken laws) is hypocrisy writ large.

 

If his dad was complicit in any way then he too needs to be prosecuted. 

 

Let the evidence be shown in open court and let us see what is true and factual.

Edited August 12, 20232 yr by Tropposurfer

56 minutes ago, nauseus said:

For now.

Please share with us what your crystal ball is telling you.

10 minutes ago, Tropposurfer said:

If the bloke broke laws let him pay. Pure and simple. 

 

If this is inflated by the right, as it has reported by the middle and left leaning press and the Democrats as being done, and for a long time i.e. that his crimes are used as an attempt to distraction from what Trump has been accused of doing (projection).

 

The evidence touted in the J6 and other election issues, if true, is treason.

 

If the Biden family as conspired to commit crimes then they too are in need of conviction and serious penalty.

 

To conflate that somehow the Biden family are worse-than, akin-to the Trump family and what appears as massive frauds and criminal wrong doings by the Trumps and imminently to be tabled openly in court with evidences to prove said criminal activity then we may be seeing a panicked right, a panicked Trump and his family, in league with the GOP. which has seemingly given away integrity to both sedition and treason making an argument based on a junkies madness as being connected to his father and wider family as a means to distract, to tar, through disinformation and misinformation in order to somehow derail the prosecutions of Trump, to sway the electorate and win power, and all through their sedition and sycophancy disguised and 'True Patriotism'.

 

We know for certain that the Trump orbit confesses regularly through their obvious projections onto the Biden's and anyone who opposes their treason.  

 

Poor sick Biden Jnr has been an atypical train wreck as a long time struggling to get clean junkie on the madness-making meth, and no wonder.

 

Trading on his family name like a wild animal trying to survive is not so far apart from what we see in open US politics ala Cruz, Hawley, Greene, and yes even Democrats. 

So to bash him (apart from making him answer to the law if he has broken laws) is hypocrisy writ large.

 

If his dad was complicit in any way then he too needs to be prosecuted. 

 

Let the evidence be shown in open court and let us see what is true and factual.

I can agree with your last sentence. But that's it.

6 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Please share with us what your crystal ball is telling you.

The oversight report link is on page 1 of this topic. It is getting quite serious now - I don't think the GOP would publish this unless they were confident of the validity of the content.

 

Lots of sub links within. 

Just now, nauseus said:

The oversight report link is on page 1 of this topic. It is getting quite serious now - I don't think the GOP would publish this unless they were confident of the validity of the content.

 

Lots of sub links within. 

How come we never hear about the laptop anymore? That was the same oversight committee.

8 hours ago, placeholder said:

As Weiss has testified, he was never impeded by Garland in any way whatsoever during his investigations. This looks like a cosmetic move to officially seal what was always the case.

This looks like Weiss is as bad as the rest of them.

7 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Nothing is emerging. There will just be more plea deals.

That blow up?

2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

How come we never hear about the laptop anymore? That was the same oversight committee.

Strange isn't it?

Just now, nauseus said:

Strange isn't it?

Predictable.

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The oversight report link is on page 1 of this topic. It is getting quite serious now - I don't think the GOP would publish this unless they were confident of the validity of the content.

 

Lots of sub links within. 

You mean like their claims for the 1023 form? That Joe Biden accepted a bribe from the head of burisma? Or Comers repeated claims of having a smoking gun? Only to have those claims dissolved when he produces the alleged evidence? Even Fox commentators were questioning his bona fides. And now their disclaimer that they don't need a smoking gun? And they falsely  misapply  a law that they claim justifies it? That doesn't sound to you like a retreat? Really?

8 minutes ago, nauseus said:

This looks like Weiss is as bad as the rest of them.

Sure. A prosecutor with whom a shred of scandal has ever been associated with, suddenly decides to go corrupt. You should be working for that house committee. Your standards of evidence are as low as theirs.

9 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Predictable.

The existence of the laptop was known of long before this House Committee on Oversight and Accountability was formed, after the GOP won last November. Where is it? Not sure - ask the FBI.

23 minutes ago, nauseus said:

The existence of the laptop was known of long before this House Committee on Oversight and Accountability was formed, after the GOP won last November. Where is it? Not sure - ask the FBI.

The existence of the laptop was always known, incriminating evidence - not so much.

37 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You mean like their claims for the 1023 form? That Joe Biden accepted a bribe from the head of burisma? Or Comers repeated claims of having a smoking gun? Only to have those claims dissolved when he produces the alleged evidence? Even Fox commentators were questioning his bona fides. And now their disclaimer that they don't need a smoking gun? And they falsely  misapply  a law that they claim justifies it? That doesn't sound to you like a retreat? Really?

Have those claims dissolved? Really?

 

You like links. Please share.

8 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

The existence of the laptop was always known, incriminating evidence - not so much.

Now why could that have been, I wonder?

16 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

The existence of the laptop was always known, incriminating evidence - not so much.

The HB laptop "likely contained evidence of tax crimes."

5 minutes ago, illisdean said:

The HB laptop "likely contained evidence of tax crimes."

Ok, and he's been investigated about tax issues. However, the right-wing propaganda alleged other crimes and is still hopelessly looking for evidence. So hopeless that they are now stating that they don't need evidence (see the other thread).

1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Have those claims dissolved? Really?

 

You like links. Please share.

 

House Oversight chair admits GOP can’t back up Biden bribery accusations

Devon Archer said the opposite of what Republicans claimed

It is true, Archer said, that in December 2015, Zlochevsky and Burisma were under a lot of pressure. But Shokin was not a cause of that pressure, he testified — Shokin was an asset.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/devon-archer-transcript-biden/

 

Democrats release evidence they claim contradicts Biden bribery allegations - including Burisma head insisting 'no one' at his company had contact with Joe while Hunter was on the board
The transcripts came from a 2019 interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the head of Burisma
In the interview, Zlochevsky told an associate of Rudy Giuliani: 'No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12248315/Burisma-head-insisted-no-one-company-contact-Joe-Biden-Hunter-board.html

 

 

Ex-Hunter Biden associate Devon Archer testifies President Biden didn't discuss 'commercial business': 

Archer testified that Joe Biden's interactions with Hunter Biden's associates were "not related to commercial business," that Joe Biden had no involvement with Burisma, the Ukrainian oil conglomerate on whose board both Archer and Hunter Biden served; that the elder Biden never took any actions to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden; and that Hunter Biden never asked his father to take any actions that would help his clients, according to the fully transcribed interview with the committee.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-committee-releases-devon-archer-transcript/story?id=101986082#:~:text=Archer testified that Joe Biden's,actions to benefit Burisma or

 

House Oversight chair admits GOP can’t back up Biden bribery accusations

The chairman of the House Oversight Committee on Monday said he and his colleagues still lack evidence proving that President Joe Biden took bribes while he was vice president during the Obama administration, despite months of investigation into his son, Hunter Biden.

Representative James Comer made the embarrassing admission during an appearance on Fox News host Sean Hannity’s eponymous nightly programme alongside Representative Jim Jordan, the chair of the House Judiciary Committee.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/james-comer-biden-bribe-accusation-fox-news-b2386040.html

 

Edited August 12, 20232 yr by metisdead
6. After pasting a reply format the text you have pasted. An easy way to do this is to click the "Paste as plain text instead" option at the bottom of the reply box.

34 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Now why could that have been, I wonder?

Occam's razor - there never was any there there.

12 minutes ago, candide said:

Ok, and he's been investigated about tax issues. However, the right-wing propaganda alleged other crimes and is still hopelessly looking for evidence. So hopeless that they are now stating that they don't need evidence (see the other thread).

What other crimes. FARA?