Jump to content

Prime minister’s most complicated, treacherous and unenviable task


webfact

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, webfact said:

image.jpeg

Tough as they were, the jobs of Prayut Chan-o-cha, Yingluck Shinawatra, Abhisit Vejjajiva appeared straightforward. And it would have been the same for Pita Limjaroenrat if he had been named the 30th prime minister of Thailand. Srettha Thavisin, on the other hand, is having the most intricate work full of booby traps, outright dangers and potential traitors.

 

To start with, in politics, even a less cut-throat one, it’s never the more the merrier. The Srettha coalition contains too many parties having clashing ideologies, public policies, personal rivals and vested interests. The first big test will come very soon in the form of fighting for administrative positions. To be able to pacify all is highly unlikely, and to be able to pacify all and have an efficient Cabinet with top-notch ethics at the same time is simply impossible.

 

Economically speaking, there will be the likes of the “digital wallet” policy that Srettha advocates but many of his present government partners question. The cannabis issue will threaten and probably shorten his honeymoon with Bhumjaithai. Projects undertaken by the previous government can lead to strife when up for review. Pheu Thai’s projects, often regarded with suspicion among those who are now in the Srettha alliance, will also lead to fundamental disagreement.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/prime-ministers-most-complicated-treacherous-and-unenviable-task/

 

-- Thai PBS 2023-08-23

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The linked article is excellent. Really well written, well thought out. Much food for thought.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, sherwood said:

First task should be to change the constitution which allows the appointment of the Senate.

Good luck with that one fella.

If this government is "able to change the constitution which allows the appointment of the Senate," does that mean there will need to be another election for the citizenry to select Senators?  If so, wouldn't it be likely that disillusioned Pheu Thai voters would switch to Move Forward?  And, a further if so, wouldn't that possible outcome make the current government unlikely to favor a movement to undo the current system of an appointed Senate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sherwood said:

Yes but the opposition need to tread very carefully.

"Slowly, slowly catch monkey."

I hope they (MFP) strategize & execute such a plan effectively.  But, I am not Thai and it's not my country, so I don't really have a say in any of it.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, sherwood said:

First task should be to change the constitution which allows the appointment of the Senate.

Good luck with that one fella.

Quite. They'll need more than luck. Can't see any way. And all the policies such as scrapping conscription, how's that going to work with all the junta parties on board? PT will be totally hamstrung. Hung parliament? Utterly ineffective? Unable to pass any legislation? Going to be interesting.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back when Thaksin was elected there was indeed improvement for the normal country folk in the North and North East. But now the PT supporters are prematurely cheering with the old establishment on board. It will not work. The establishment doesn't play with dirty kids. The fact that the PT party has caved in and celebrates brotherhood with the old putschists instead of respecting the will of the people for more democracy will not pay off.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2023 at 1:41 PM, sherwood said:

First task should be to change the constitution which allows the appointment of the Senate.

Good luck with that one fella.

Have you read the constitution? The one that was supported in a referendum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, DaiHard said:

Have you read the constitution? The one that was supported in a referendum?

That referendum was a disgusting travesty. People were threatened with imprisonment and huge fines for criticising it.

 

"The NCPO banned criticism of the draft constitution and prohibited monitoring of the referendum. Activists against the document were arrested, detained, and prosecuted in military courts,[4] whilst voters who expressed their intention to vote against the draft were also arrested and prosecuted by the military regime.[5]"

 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Thai_constitutional_referendum

 

This was Prayut at his finest. A neo fascist. The result? The bloody Senate.

 

Edited by bradiston
  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bradiston said:

That referendum was a disgusting travesty. People were threatened with imprisonment and huge fines for criticising it.

 

"The NCPO banned criticism of the draft constitution and prohibited monitoring of the referendum. Activists against the document were arrested, detained, and prosecuted in military courts,[4] whilst voters who expressed their intention to vote against the draft were also arrested and prosecuted by the military regime.[5]"

 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Thai_constitutional_referendum

 

This was Prayut at his finest.

 

You believe Wikipedia? Matichon is hardly impartial and the activists were not arrested arrested for protesting the document, they were arrested for breaking the law for taking part in a gathering of 5 or more people and refusing to disperse when told to by the police. This law was brought in just after the unrest in Bangkok.

 

Even Wikipedia had to concede "The ‘Yes’ camp accounted for 61.4 per cent of the voter turn-out, while the ‘No’ faction could garner only 38.6 per cent, with 94 per cent of the votes counted on the day after."

 

Did you know that it was drawn up by German constitutional scholars and Prayut wasn't involved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaiHard said:

You believe Wikipedia? Matichon is hardly impartial and the activists were not arrested arrested for protesting the document, they were arrested for breaking the law for taking part in a gathering of 5 or more people and refusing to disperse when told to by the police. This law was brought in just after the unrest in Bangkok.

 

Even Wikipedia had to concede "The ‘Yes’ camp accounted for 61.4 per cent of the voter turn-out, while the ‘No’ faction could garner only 38.6 per cent, with 94 per cent of the votes counted on the day after."

 

Did you know that it was drawn up by German constitutional scholars and Prayut wasn't involved?

No it wasn't. It was put together by a team of Thai legal "experts" headed by the chief advocate for Pita appealing the ludicrous ruling made by the speaker to allow a vote on his second nomination, Borwornsak Uwanno. And yes I do believe most of Wikipedia. What are your sources for apologising for this disaster?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borwornsak_Uwanno

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...