WrLife still ok?

[bubblegum]

We talked about WRLive change of policy I got this answer from them:

Patrick 



 



Aan:U

CC:Contact WRLIFE

Di 2024-10-22 18:15

 

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract MDI963187 is from 2022.

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

2 hours ago, bubblegum said:

We talked about WRLive change of policy I got this answer from them:

Patrick 



 



Aan:U

CC:Contact WRLIFE

Di 2024-10-22 18:15

 

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract MDI963187 is from 2022.

 

Well, that certainly clears things up, doesn't it?

[jerrymahoney]

6 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

9 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Because I am the founder and CEO of WrLife.

You can same my email:

You are not concerned.

Your contract nnnnn is from 2022.

 

Well, that certainly clears things up, doesn't it?

Maybe overly cryptic but sounds like he's saying the new degenerative illnesses policy is not retroactive to existing policies.

 

But no worries --  you and your compatriot may still have "the proof to go after the individual behind the company."

[Etaoin Shrdlu]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Maybe overly cryptic but sounds like he's saying the new degenerative illnesses policy is not retroactive to existing policies.

 

But no worries --  you and your compatriot may still have "the proof to go after the individual behind the company."

 

Perhaps policies that were issued more recently already contain the restrictive wording, but older policies don't and the new wording only applies to them. But difficult to tell based upon this. 

 

I think it was fairly clear from the broker's statement in the OP that the changes were being implemented with respect to existing policies. In fact, the broker stated that WRLife originally wanted to impose them mid-term instead of at renewal.

[jerrymahoney]

As of now I don't know for sure -- the policy doc when my policy was issued does not contain the word "degenerative".

But this topic gave you another chance to list Shrdlu's greatest hits as to what an insurance company SHOULD do but this one doesn't.

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them. Edited October 23 by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

20 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

As of now I don't know for sure -- the policy doc when my policy was issued does not contain the word "degenerative".

But this topic gave you another chance to list Shrdlu's greatest hits as to what an insurance company SHOULD do but this one doesn't.

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them.

 

I think those comparisons are perfectly valid.

 

Who is the underwriter of your policy?  Ask the company then you tell us who it is, if you can.

 

 

Edited October 23 by JBChiangRai

[Celsius]

Yall must be reading different trust pilot reviews

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, Celsius said:

Yall must be reading different trust pilot reviews

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

 

Meaning?

[jerrymahoney]

14 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

34 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

There can be reasonable critiques of this company and how they do business -- invoking the ghost of Bernie Madoff and that Italian guy from Boston isn't one of them.

 

I think those comparisons are perfectly valid.

7. You will not post defamatory or libelous comments. Defamation is the issuance of a statement about another person or business which causes that person or business to suffer harm or loss. A statement does not have to be false to be defamatory

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

7. You will not post defamatory or libelous comments. Defamation is the issuance of a statement about another person or business which causes that person or business to suffer harm or loss. A statement does not have to be false to be defamatory

 

Someone reported one of my posts, and the report was denied.

 

Stop deflecting and answer the question, Who is the underwriter of your policy?

 

It doesn't make sense for you to take out a policy without checking out the underwriter is able to meet it's obligations.

[jerrymahoney]

I'll answer what I want to answer and leave the critiques to others

At least so far for me it has made a lot of sense.

You are presuming there is one underwriter consistent for the entire policy term. I don't make that assumption.

Edited October 23 by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

I'll answer what I want to answer and leave the critiques to others. At least so far for me it has made a lot of sense.

 

And I accept it has made sense to you.

[jerrymahoney]

17 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

That last statement you posted if accurate is exactly the kind of thing that would give you the proof to go after the individual behind the company.

So why don;'t you just go after the guy and leave me and others on here out of it.

[JBChiangRai]

6 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

So why don;'t you just go after the guy and leave me and others on here out of it.

 

I don't have a horse in this race.

 

I just want people to make an educated decision before spending their money.

[jerrymahoney]

11 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

I don't have a horse in this race.

 

I just want people to make an educated decision before spending their money.

BS you're in full time attack mode as indicated by your chosen vocabulary

Edited October 23 by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

3 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

BS you're in full time attack mode

 

You're entitled to your opinion, and I get how you want it to be all good.

 

My concern is how will they handle a large claim, heart attack, kidney transplant etc, the most important thing is to understand the underwriter.  I'm sure you understand the underwriter fully as you're a shareholder in it, your policy document says so, check your share certificate.

 

Every document they have is gobbledygook

[Henk Langeweg]

Relax Boys otherwise the thread will be closed again ... and all the usefull info will be gone.

[NanLaew]

1 hour ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

I don't have a horse in this race.

 

I just want people to make an educated decision before spending their money.

 

Altruism... you don't see a lot of that these days, eh?

 

So, how's your new gig as financial adviser and ad-hoc insurance ombudsman working out?

[JBChiangRai]

2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Altruism... you don't see a lot of that these days, eh?

 

So, how's your new gig as financial adviser and ad-hoc insurance ombudsman working out?

 

If I could just find a way to make it pay....

[jerrymahoney]

1 hour ago, JBChiangRai said:

You're entitled to your opinion, and I get how you want it to be all good.

You talk about 'going after' the individual -- what are you going to do, bust his knees?

 

Personally, I took out their policy after being insured by BUPA Thailand /pre-Aetna and Cigna Global, when I had few other options -- and I made sure I had another option if they didn't come through -- but so far, due to the luick of the Irish, they have twice

 

And the words that you use which I will not repeat is why I consider your efforts disingenuous.

 

Edited October 23 by jerrymahoney

[JBChiangRai]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

You talk about 'going after' the individual -- what are you going to do, bust his knees?

 

Personally, I took out their policy after being insured by BUPA Thailand /pre-Aetna and Cigna Global, when I had few other options -- and I made sure I had another option if they didn't come through -- but so far, due to the luick of the Irish, they have twice

 

And the words that you use which I will not repeat is why I consider your efforts disingenuous.

 

 

I think we just have to agree to disagree.  I have raised most of my concerns, I hope that helps others.

[jerrymahoney]

You haven't said anything 'useful' that Ms. Sheryl And K.Shrdlu hasn't said 2 years ago. Edited October 23 by jerrymahoney

[madone]

On 11/16/2023 at 3:53 AM, scubascuba3 said:

i would look at the non 5* reviews, as the 5* ones suspect to me, bare in mind anyone can leave a review

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

 

Wow. I'm not a big believer in what I read anywhere, but the fact that someone apparently representing the company has taken the time to call everyone leaving a 1-star report a liar really turns me off.   

[brewsterbudgen]

9 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

You haven't said anything 'useful' that Ms. Sheryl And K.Shrdlu hasn't said 2 years ago.

Indeed; there's little point in going over it all again.  At least not until the first big 'claim denied' thread, or when/if WRLife crash and burn!

[scubascuba3]

49 minutes ago, madone said:

Wow. I'm not a big believer in what I read anywhere, but the fact that someone apparently representing the company has taken the time to call everyone leaving a 1-star report a liar really turns me off. 

Doesn't turn JerryMahoney off, it excites him

[madone]

4 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Doesn't turn JerryMahoney off, it excites him

The topic does seem to resonate with him, doesn't it?

[JBChiangRai]

On 11/16/2023 at 3:53 AM, scubascuba3 said:

i would look at the non 5* reviews, as the 5* ones suspect to me, bare in mind anyone can leave a review

 

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.wrlife.net

 

53 minutes ago, madone said:

 

Wow. I'm not a big believer in what I read anywhere, but the fact that someone apparently representing the company has taken the time to call everyone leaving a 1-star report a liar really turns me off.   

4 of those 5* reviews are from people with the same name as officers or associates of WrLife, one, the CEO.

[JBChiangRai]

@jerrymahoney are you in any way connected with WrLife other than you bought their health insurance?

[bubblegum]

Just received this:

 

You are welcome.

The updated the policy is for the new incoming people.

We updated the policy because of the fraud.

 

 

Best regards, Patrick, WrLife

[Henk Langeweg]

15 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Just received this:

 

You are welcome.

The updated the policy is for the new incoming people.

We updated the policy because of the fraud.

 

 

Best regards, Patrick, WrLife

So the policy of WrLife for each member is the one when that member stepped in? Doesn't fit with the practise of sending me a policy every year when I pay for a new year extension.

Edited October 23 by Henk Langeweg