Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Come on a boat FLY home for Christmas ? So why not fly in to start with and do it properly ?

 

Scam artists after the freebies! Hardly persecuted if going back home for Christmas.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Happens all the time in Australia, they plead for their safety, can't be returned to their countries of origin because they'll be persecuted and killed, then as soon as they get Aussie citizenship and PPs they're flying back home to visit their relis. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

The officer being interviewed actually stated that Asylum Seekers were being prevented from leaving the country whilst their asylum claim was still active.

I understand that if they did actually leave the UK then their claim was withdrawn.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, theoldgit said:

The officer being interviewed actually stated that Asylum Seekers were being prevented from leaving the country whilst their asylum claim was still active.

I understand that if they did actually leave the UK then their claim was withdrawn.

 

Exactly. Over reaction.

 

People seem to have missed the words " attempting to" when reporting going to home country.

 

I'd have thought those on here who are anti asylum seekers would prefer they weren't stopped. 

Posted

Same self destructive handling of the "refugees"/"asylum seekers" in so many countries.

Let them fly one way with a nice deported stamp (make sure having biometrics done).

 

Posted
20 minutes ago, theoldgit said:

The officer being interviewed actually stated that Asylum Seekers were being prevented from leaving the country whilst their asylum claim was still active.

I understand that if they did actually leave the UK then their claim was withdrawn.

 

 

This guy is not a "Border Force Chief".  More likely a Chief Immigration Officer which is junior management level.

 

I cannot envisage why he, or anyone else in Border Force, would wish to stop an asylum claimant returning to their home country.  Such a trip to their home country would surely be grounds for refusing entry if they were to return by legal means. 

 

If they were to return by illegal means such as on a small boat or by clandestine entry the fact they made a trip back to their home country would undermine any renewed claim for asylum.

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, In the jungle said:

 

This guy is not a "Border Force Chief".  More likely a Chief Immigration Officer which is junior management level.

 

I cannot envisage why he, or anyone else in Border Force, would wish to stop an asylum claimant returning to their home country.  Such a trip to their home country would surely be grounds for refusing entry if they were to return by legal means. 


Phil Douglas is actually the DG of the Border Force, so a tad senior than a Senior Officer (CIO old speak) 

 

But yes if anyone seeking asylum left the UK before a decision was made on their application, then they  should forfeit their application.

 

Mr Douglas didn’t explain how they would be able to board a flight back to the UK, as far as I’m aware the UKBA don’t issue re-entry permits.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...