The gloves are off in the 2024 presidential race, as the Biden campaign launched a scathing attack on former President Donald Trump, declaring he shouldn't even be within 100 miles of the White House. This bold statement marks a significant escalation in rhetoric and throws the spotlight on Trump's legal troubles and potential disqualification for future office.

 

The Accusatory Finger:

Mitch Landrieu, national co-chair of President Biden's reelection campaign, fired the opening salvo in a Sunday interview, blasting Trump's 91 ongoing felony counts across four courts. Landrieu pointedly questioned the legitimacy of anyone facing such legal entanglements even seeking the presidency, let alone being "within 100 miles of the White House."

 

Targeting the Legal Battles:

This statement isn't simply political mudslinging. It specifically targets Trump's legal vulnerabilities, including the recent $83.3 million verdict against him for defaming columnist E. Jean Carroll. By highlighting these ongoing legal battles, the Biden campaign aims to cast doubt on Trump's viability as a candidate and paint him as someone unfit for public office.

 

Escalating the Narrative:

Landrieu's comments mark a turning point in the campaign, shifting the focus from policy differences to Trump's personal and legal challenges. This strategy suggests the Biden campaign believes these issues could be potent deterrents to Trump's candidacy and potentially sway undecided voters.

 

Beyond the Headlines:

 

While the "100-mile radius" remark might grab headlines, the underlying message is more nuanced. The Biden campaign aims to:

• Raise questions about Trump's legal fitness for office.
• Shift the campaign narrative towards Trump's personal challenges.
• Mobilize the anti-Trump base and energize Democratic voters.

 

The Road Ahead:

Trump's response to these accusations remains to be seen, but this exchange sets the stage for a potentially fierce and personal campaign. Whether the "100-mile" statement becomes a defining slogan or fades into the noise, it serves as a clear marker of the Biden campaign's intent to aggressively challenge Trump's fitness for office in the public eye.

 

30.01.24

Source

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

he [former President Trump] shouldn't even be within 100 miles of the White House

I agree, and that includes Arlington when the time comes.

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

 

I agree, and that includes Arlington when the time comes.

Ditto big time nor within 100 miles of grants tomb 

So, are they going to drop the DC cases against Trump to keep him 100 miles away or were they just lying again/still? 

Whilst I am sure the "democrats" would love to be the ones making the decision, they are going to have to face the reality that in a Democracy it is the voters who decide such matters.

 

They can bring as many lame cases to their Kangaroo courts as they wish, but voters will not be fooled. The black, hispanic and young voters are seeing through Biden's empty rhetoric and failed policies. 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/01/01/biden-trump-poll-odds-black-hispanic-young-voters/72072111007/

 

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Whilst I am sure the "democrats" would love to be the ones making the decision, they are going to have to face the reality that in a Democracy it is the voters who decide such matters.

 

If you recall,  the last time the voters decided it wasn’t the Democrats rioting and invading the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the election result.

 

 

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

If you recall,  the last time the voters decided it wasn’t the Democrats rioting and invading the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the election result.

 

 

 

A few loons in fancy dress (quite possibly containing agent provocateurs).

 

Hardly a threat to Democracy. Certainly not when compared to the politicization of the justice legal system to remove your main political rival in the build up to an election.   

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

A few loons in fancy dress (quite possibly containing agent provocateurs).

 

Hardly a threat to Democracy. Certainly not when compared to the politicization of the justice legal system to remove your main political rival in the build up to an election.   

Yes and the few people they killed at the time don't matter right?

 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

A few loons in fancy dress (quite possibly containing agent provocateurs).

 

Hardly a threat to Democracy. Certainly not when compared to the politicization of the justice legal system to remove your main political rival in the build up to an election.   

Ill informed conspiracy laced nonsense.

 

 

Edited January 30, 20242 yr by Chomper Higgot

4 minutes ago, jvs said:

Yes and the few people they killed at the time don't matter right?

 

 

Of course it matters. People are often injured or killed at protests/demonstrations. The BLM riots for example. Or the Jewish man at the Pro Palestine marches in California recently. Or the Trump Supporter shot dead by the Antifa nutter.

 

It's totally unacceptable, but it doesn't make it a coup. 

33 minutes ago, jvs said:

Yes and the few people they killed at the time don't matter right?

 

As I recall, 2 women were killed by cops, a cop died of a stroke (Sicknick), and 2 participants died of heart attacks.

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/07/capitol-riot-deaths-cause-death-released-4-5-not-sicknick/7128040002/

 

Regarding Roseanne Boyland, she died of an overdose just like George Floyd did...  Check the videos, which were withheld from the public through the investigations. The cops beat the crap out of her.

 

https://dallasexpress.com/featured/jan-6-capitol-police-allegedly-repeatedly-strike-unconscious-protester/

 

 

Edited January 30, 20242 yr by impulse

21 minutes ago, jvs said:

Yes and the few people they killed at the time don't matter right?

There was only one killed on Jan 6th shot dead by police,  the others died heart attacks and drug overdose.

43 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Whilst I am sure the "democrats" would love to be the ones making the decision, they are going to have to face the reality that in a Democracy it is the voters who decide such matters.

 

 

 

Best you tell your boy donny that. He took offense in 2020 that the voters didn't choose him, and subsequently tried to overthrow the elected government.

 

He lost the popular vote twice, and took the House and Senate down with him.

 

The word for that sort of guy is: Loser.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

 

I agree, and that includes Arlington when the time comes.

 

His dupes will keep on claiming that he isn't dead, up to the point where his hair makes a dash for freedom before he's screwed down into the coffin.

 

Then they'll start worshipping that instead.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

If you recall,  the last time the voters decided it wasn’t the Democrats rioting and invading the Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the election result.

 

 

I you recall, thousands of Democrats rioted for days after Trump won the 2016 election.

 

Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide (usatoday.com)

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I you recall, thousands of Democrats rioted for days after Trump won the 2016 election.

 

Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide (usatoday.com)

You can not see the difference between a protest and a violent take over of the Capitol?

 

1 hour ago, jvs said:

Yes and the few people they killed at the time don't matter right?

 

Who did "they" kill? No one intentionally. 

 

One unarmed young woman shot and killed by security climbing though a window. 

 

None of the protestors/rioters in the Capital has a gun. 

 

Just now, jvs said:

You can not see the difference between a protest and a violent take over of the Capitol?

 

I see January 6 as a riot, and the burning and looting by the left as a riot.

 

Both were protests as well. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, jvs said:

You can not see the difference between a protest and a violent take over of the Capitol?

 

Let me guess, anytime the left loots, burns and riots, it's a protest. Any time the right riots, it's the end of democracy as we know it. 

 

 

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Let me guess, anytime the left loots, burns and riots, it's a protest. 

 

You forgot to say mostly peaceful.  Like the MSM.  As entire city blocks were destroyed.

 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I you recall, thousands of Democrats rioted for days after Trump won the 2016 election.

 

Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide (usatoday.com)

Nobody tried to stop the election result being ratified by Congress in 2016.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I see January 6 as a riot, and the burning and looting by the left as a riot.

 

Both were protests as well. 

 

 

Convictions handed down by the Courts suggest you are mischaracterizing the events of January 6.

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I you recall, thousands of Democrats rioted for days after Trump won the 2016 election.

 

Anti-Trump protests, some violent, erupt for 3rd night nationwide (usatoday.com)

The same ridiculous false equivalence again....

4 minutes ago, candide said:

The same ridiculous false equivalence again....

That's what the cultists do. They don't have actual arguments. They have belief in the dear leader.

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Nobody tried to stop the election result being ratified by Congress in 2016.

So burning, looting and rioting is okay, as long as leftists are doing it. 

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Convictions handed down by the Courts suggest you are mischaracterizing the events of January 6.

Biden's court

25 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Biden's court

Biden's juries too?

17 minutes ago, candide said:

Biden's juries too?

Most of them plead out to BS charges.

 

No one in the Capital had a gun, or killed anyone or was convicted of insurrection. 

53 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So burning, looting and rioting is okay, as long as leftists are doing it. 

Erm no.

 

You’ve managed a non sequitur and whataboutary in one short post. 

54 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Biden's court

Biden’s Grand Jury and those Proud Boys who decided to confess where Biden’s too.