Jump to content

Thailand’s DNP refutes Khao Yai National Park farmland claims


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg


Claims to farmland within Khao Yai National Park were strongly refuted by Thailand’s Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) on Sunday. This came in response to a recent announcement by the Agricultural Land Reform Office (Alro) that approximately 2,933 rai of land within Pak Chong district, a Unesco World Heritage site area, have been designated as agricultural land for farmers.

 

DNP’s director-general, Athapol Charoenshunsa, stressed that Sor Por Kor land entitlements cannot be granted to land identified as a national park area. His comments followed an on-site visit to the disputed area, alongside a team from the DNP.

 

The team revealed that park authorities reclaimed a plot of land in the eighth National Park Management Area in July last year, previously occupied by a private party. Further instances of wrongful occupancy within the national park’s land were reported in August. On January 9, it was discovered that seven Sor Por Kor documents had been issued for over seven rai of land within the park, reported Bangkok Post.

 

The head of Khao Yai National Park, Chaiya Huayhongthong, has written to Alro to protest against the landmarking and has demanded the removal of boundary markers from the park. Chaiya has also requested information regarding the issuance of Sor Por Kor rights documents but is yet to receive a response.


A joint investigation by the national park office chief and the Phaya Sue task force is currently ongoing. Chaiya highlighted that the decree on agricultural land reform mandates a thorough review of the status of the land in question before any redesignation. He went on to mention that the authorities must also verify that the land’s occupants are indeed farmers. However, in this case, the individuals who received Sor Por Kor rights within the park do not appear to be farmers.

 

The National Park Office Director, Chaiwat Limlikit-aksorn, has reported the issue to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Natural Resources and Environment, Gen Phatcharavat Wongsuwan.

 

by Mitch Connor

Photo courtesy of Bangkok Post

 

Source: The Thaiger 2024-02-19

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Join us now!

Posted
7 minutes ago, webfact said:

Claims to farmland within Khao Yai National Park were strongly refuted by Thailand’s Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) on Sunday. This came in response to a recent announcement by the Agricultural Land Reform Office (Alro) that approximately 2,933 rai of land within Pak Chong district, a Unesco World Heritage site area, have been designated as agricultural land for farmers.

What? Trouble in paradise? 

Posted
6 hours ago, webfact said:

The team revealed that park authorities reclaimed a plot of land in the eighth National Park Management Area in July last year, previously occupied by a private party. Further instances of wrongful occupancy within the national park’s land were reported in August. On January 9, it was discovered that seven Sor Por Kor documents had been issued for over seven rai of land within the park, reported Bangkok Post

 

6 hours ago, webfact said:

The head of Khao Yai National Park, Chaiya Huayhongthong, has written to Alro to protest against the landmarking and has demanded the removal of boundary markers from the park. Chaiya has also requested information regarding the issuance of Sor Por Kor rights documents but is yet to receive a response.

 

6 hours ago, webfact said:

He went on to mention that the authorities must also verify that the land’s occupants are indeed farmers. However, in this case, the individuals who received Sor Por Kor rights within the park do not appear to be farmers.

Seems like a history of dodgy dealings at the land office?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...