Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

‘Flight risk’.

 

What on earth are you waffling on about.

 

The $464 million penalty ruling against Trump for the frauds he committed is a ‘Civil Court’ ruling.

 

It was not a criminal trial, there is no prison sentence and hence ‘flight risk’ is not even a consideration.

 

The Court has all the powers it needs to seize Trump’s assets regardless of wether or not he does a runner.

 

Once again, we see a perfect example of you, a Trump supporter, running running your mouth only to expose the extent of your ignorance on the matter under discussion.

 

You’re not the only one, it’s a thing amongst a certain section of Trump supporters.

Democrat judge

Hates Trump

Plucks numbers out of thin air

 

Nothing to see here.

 

 

Just now, Dolf said:

Democrat judge

Hates Trump

Plucks numbers out of thin air

 

Nothing to see here.

 

 

Do you want us to ignore the fact that you just inserted ‘flight risk’ and I doing so exposed your ignorance in the matter under discussion?

 

Clearly you haven’t a clue what you are talking about.

 

Why you choose to display your ignorance in post after post is a mystery.

 

 

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

‘Flight risk’.

 

What on earth are you waffling on about?

 

The $464 million penalty ruling against Trump for the frauds he committed is a ‘Civil Court’ ruling.

 

It was not a criminal trial, there is no prison sentence and hence ‘flight risk’ is not even a consideration.

 

The Court has all the powers it needs to seize Trump’s assets regardless of wether or not he does a runner.

 

Once again, we see a perfect example of you, a Trump supporter, running your mouth only to expose the extent of your ignorance on the matter under discussion.

 

You’re not the only one, it’s a thing amongst a certain section of Trump supporters.

 

 

How true..........🤗

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Do you want us to ignore the fact that you just inserted ‘flight risk’ and I doing so exposed your ignorance in the matter under discussion?

 

Clearly you haven’t a clue what you are talking about.

 

Why you choose to display your ignorance in post after post is a mystery.

 

 

The opposite is true. The only people who were asked to put up more than $200m in security were considered flight risks.

 

Thanks for proving me right once again. The judge is dodgy.

17 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Democrat judge

Hates Trump

Plucks numbers out of thin air

 

Nothing to see here.

 

 

B.S. as usual! 😀

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

‘Flight risk’.

 

What on earth are you waffling on about?

 

The $464 million penalty ruling against Trump for the frauds he committed is a ‘Civil Court’ ruling.

 

It was not a criminal trial, there is no prison sentence and hence ‘flight risk’ is not even a consideration.

 

The Court has all the powers it needs to seize Trump’s assets regardless of wether or not he does a runner.

 

Once again, we see a perfect example of you, a Trump supporter, running your mouth only to expose the extent of your ignorance on the matter under discussion.

 

You’re not the only one, it’s a thing amongst a certain section of Trump supporters.

 

 

Real experts (not you) question the ruling

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/legal-experts-say-trumps-whopping-new-york-fee-could-be-excessive-under-constitution-unheard-of

6 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Real experts (not you) question the ruling

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/legal-experts-say-trumps-whopping-new-york-fee-could-be-excessive-under-constitution-unheard-of

FOX are indeed experts at making excessively high payouts.

 

 

Legal experts agree with me

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/legal-experts-say-trumps-whopping-new-york-fee-could-be-excessive-under-constitution-unheard-of

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

FOX are indeed experts at making excessively high payouts.

 

 

They interviewed outsiders.

 

Where is your law degree?

 

Anyone that studied 1st year law knows this penalty will not stand.

 

 

Edited March 26, 20242 yr by Dolf

Sad to see so many of you have caught the trump contagion.  

4 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Looks increasingly like a victory for Trump come November 5.

Trump wins only if his cre turns out … and the vast majority of American voters do not vote. I they majority votes he … again … will be defeated.

1 hour ago, bubblegum said:

I find Trump supporters very aggressive.

Majority of Supporters believe and support America & a Constitutional republic.

My country was founded on

a aggressive approach .The founders of The USA,could of been all hung by the King of England for treason, if captured.

What country  are you from?

5 minutes ago, riclag said:

Majority of Supporters believe and support America & a Constitutional republic.

My country was founded on

a aggressive approach .The founders of The USA,could of been all hung by the King of England for treason, if captured.

What country  are you from?

Was great until 1988. All downhill since. The pc and wokes have ruined it.

21 minutes ago, Elkski said:

Sad to see so many of you have caught the trump contagion.  

A prelude to Nov 6 . The day after 

45 becomes 47. Part of the liberal tears phenomenon!

 

imop

1 hour ago, riclag said:

Majority of Supporters believe and support America & a Constitutional republic.

My country was founded on

a aggressive approach .The founders of The USA,could of been all hung by the King of England for treason, if captured.

What country  are you from?

The Netherlands and as a nation we have been at war with England more times than the USA but we still not use this as an excuse for being the tallest people in the world.

Posts using derogatory nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be deleted. If you don’t want your post to be deleted, spell people’s names correctly.

35 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

The Netherlands and as a nation we have been at war with England more times than the USA but we still not use this as an excuse for being the tallest people in the world.

Well my country was a colony of Great Britain we had to be the tallest to overcome a tyrannical Government!

The same thing is happening again by a Government who has Weaponized agencies to persecute the opposition party leader that has vowed to clean up a bureaucratic system (Washington establishment ) that has failed America First!

 

7 minutes ago, riclag said:

Well my country was a colony of Great Britain we had to be the tallest to overcome a tyrannical Government!

The same thing is happening again by a Government who has Weaponized agencies to persecute the opposition party leader that has vowed to clean up a bureaucratic system (Washington establishment ) that has failed America First!

 

And the guy you fluff for says he will be a dictator on day 1.

The new Trump company is merely a mechanism for the Trump faithful to lose more money.

11 hours ago, riclag said:

 

The same thing is happening again by a Government who has Weaponized agencies to persecute the opposition party leader 

Don't forget the government persecution of Hunter Biden.

It would appear reports of Trump's money problems were greatly exaggerated.

 

4 Billy. Not too shabby. 😄

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68667664

 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

It would appear reports of Trump's money problems were greatly exaggerated.

 

4 Billy. Not too shabby. 😄

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68667664

 

 

Paper wealth and much depend on shares meeting performance requirements of an unprofitable company in 6 months period. Not time yet to gloat. 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

It would appear reports of Trump's money problems were greatly exaggerated.

 

4 Billy. Not too shabby. 😄

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68667664

 

You should buy some shares! 😆

On 3/26/2024 at 11:27 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

 

The penalty was calculated on the basis of the fraud’s Trump committed.

The collection process will almost certainly take a great deal longer than the appeal.

 

It’s first outcome would be to reveal exactly what assets Trump owns and what is in hock. Actually collecting on the penalty is a way off yet.

 

 

Once again you display how little you know about anything USA, beyond perhaps Disney Land.

 

 

BS if it was, it was purely political, she said she'd bring him down...hardly impartial !!

 

Edited March 27, 20242 yr by CharlieH
Facebook link removed.

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

It would appear reports of Trump's money problems were greatly exaggerated.

 

4 Billy. Not too shabby. 😄

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68667664

 

Did you buy any shares of Trump stock?

 

This is yet another scam for Trump fans to lose money.

7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

BS if it was, it was purely political, she said she'd bring him down...hardly non bias aye!!

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1040343780018850

The penalty was ordered by the judge not by LJ. You got the gender mixed up. 

21 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

So have they finally got him, this time?

haha, yeah, he's going to jai haha. watch the goal posts move again!

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

 

Paper wealth and much depend on shares meeting performance requirements of an unprofitable company in 6 months period. Not time yet to gloat. 

 

Why would I gloat?

 

As a neutral observer I just saw the report and thought I would post it for the benefit of those who are under the impression he is broke. He appears to be anything but broke. 

 

Makes no difference to me.

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Did you buy any shares of Trump stock?

 

Not that I am aware of. But the management company that manages my investments do not have specific instructions not to buy stock on political grounds so I guess it's possible.

 

10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

 

This is yet another scam for Trump fans to lose money.

 

I doubt that. But if people wish to invest based on their heart rather than their head that is their choice. Maybe you should direct these questions at a Trump fan?

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Not that I am aware of. But the management company that manages my investments do not have specific instructions not to buy stock on political grounds so I guess it's possible.

 

 

I doubt that. But if people wish to invest based on their heart rather than their head that is their choice. Maybe you should direct these questions at a Trump fan?

Regardless of the politics, over the long term, a stock's price is related to its earnings. If the ratio of share price to earnings is too high, the share price eventually declines.

 

Most of the time. Crypto is a noticeable exception.

 

Anyway, Trump's company loses money, so the share price eventually will decline.