candide Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said: You must give him credit? as he is good consistent at it Right. He's more talented than Bignok/Dolf was. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottiejohn Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 49 minutes ago, candide said: Right. He's more talented than Bignok/Dolf was. Anyone, even this one, would be! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aries Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Yellowtail said: You don't know either, thought not. Carry on troll https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump_as_president#Trump_as_defendant Starter for 10 for you 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted April 26 Popular Post Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, aries said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump_as_president#Trump_as_defendant Starter for 10 for you And yet another schoolteacher that has no idea, and yet feels the need to jump with the rest of the lemmings. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post aries Posted April 26 Popular Post Share Posted April 26 11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: And yet another schoolteacher that has no idea, and yet feels the need to jump with the rest of the lemmings. 555 You asked and didn't like the answer, bless you, please don't breed... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted April 26 Popular Post Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, aries said: 555 You asked and didn't like the answer, bless you, please don't breed... You provided no answer, and you have no idea what the answer is. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aries Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: You provided no answer, and you have no idea what the answer is. IQ of a peanut then like the rest of those voting for the Cheeto coloured fascist? You asked for the criminal and civil cases against the urophiliac in chief, so I provided them for you. Now see if you can string a salient sentence together for me offering a critique of these cases... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, aries said: IQ of a peanut then like the rest of those voting for the Cheeto coloured fascist? You asked for the criminal and civil cases against the urophiliac in chief, so I provided them for you. Now see if you can string a salient sentence together for me offering a critique of these cases... No, I asked what the people that the topic of this thread have been charged with, and because you don't know, you post an irrelevant link, and then when I point out that you don't know, you call me names. Not only did you not know the answer, but you also didn't even know what was being asked. Typical. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Oh, I get it now, aries the bulls****r, you got me! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post aries Posted April 26 Popular Post Share Posted April 26 26 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Oh, I get it now, aries the bulls****r, you got me! Aww look at you spitting inanities instead of using some cognitive reasoning. Bless you for using a logical fallacy in the face of intelligence. If you wish to use an ad hominem attack on me personally when you can't respond with intelligence, I will happily school you every time you use one. Not the smartest tool in the shed are you? I guess that is why you support Trump though as all analysis points to those with limited intellectual capacity and education providing about 75% of Trump's voting population. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aries Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: No, I asked what the people that the topic of this thread have been charged with, and because you don't know, you post an irrelevant link, and then when I point out that you don't know, you call me names. Not only did you not know the answer, but you also didn't even know what was being asked. Typical. I really don't think you are this silly that you do not see the link between Trump's people trying to spoil the vote and Trump's own indictments on the very same thing. You really can't be that ideologically stunted right? You do realise they are all interlinked right???? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newnative Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Lock all of 'em up already. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 6 hours ago, Yellowtail said: You mean like when you guys claim he's guilty of 91 crimes, but none of you seem to know what they are? 1 hour ago, Yellowtail said: No, I asked what the people that the topic of this thread have been charged with, and because you don't know, you post an irrelevant link, and then when I point out that you don't know, you call me names. Not only did you not know the answer, but you also didn't even know what was being asked. Typical. And it's not like you would have mentioned 91 crimes... 😀 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prubangboy Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 This stuff never happened to anyone else in the history of the universe, and yet it happened to Trump 87 times -that we know of. OK, they moan about Trump Derangement syndrome. But what about agog, slack-jawed, complete suspension of disbelief syndrome? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 On 4/26/2024 at 9:29 PM, aries said: IQ of a peanut then like the rest of those voting for the Cheeto coloured fascist? You asked for the criminal and civil cases against the urophiliac in chief, so I provided them for you. Now see if you can string a salient sentence together for me offering a critique of these cases... Aww look at you spitting inanities instead of using some cognitive reasoning. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 On 4/26/2024 at 10:13 PM, aries said: I really don't think you are this silly that you do not see the link between Trump's people trying to spoil the vote and Trump's own indictments on the very same thing. You really can't be that ideologically stunted right? You do realise they are all interlinked right???? You don't know what the charges, yet you are certain they are guilty, got it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 On 4/26/2024 at 5:41 PM, Yellowtail said: You don't know what the charges are, I thought not, thanks. Is the previous AG that conspired with then being charged sedition now the new Democrat AG has been elected? It seems to be your position that most Republicans are seditionist, correct? Should they not all be charged? If we haven't memorized the charges, does that mean they don't exist? We just went through this with the NY case. You really need to get new material for your trolling. If you don't know what the Arizona charges are, Google is your friend. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: You don't know what the charges, yet you are certain they are guilty, got it. Here is the charging document: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24604435-arizona-indictments?responsive=1&title=1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: You don't know what the charges, yet you are certain they are guilty, got it. This is not a difficult concept: The criminal acts are described in the media, so we know generally what the charges are, without knowing the specific statutes that were violated. I know OJ Simpson was charged with killing his wife. To this day, I don't know what statutes he was charged with. Please stop trolling. Geez, Trump wasn't even indicted, just his disposable mooks. Why are you bothering to defend them? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 51 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: If we haven't memorized the charges, does that mean they don't exist? We just went through this with the NY case. You really need to get new material for your trolling. If you don't know what the Arizona charges are, Google is your friend. No, it just means that they are lying when they claim they know what the charges are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: No, it just means that they are lying when they claim they know what the charges are. Once again, anyone who says they know the charges from reading the news isn't lying. How old are you? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Once again, anyone who says they know the charges from reading the news isn't lying. How old are you? So, what are the charges? I'm 34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: No, it just means that they are lying when they claim they know what the charges are. The charges are basically forgery and conspiracy to do so. I saw the video of the fake electors, so I'm pretty sure they are guilty. Many will flip. Some of the fake electors were duped - they were assured by Trump lawyers that signing the documents was legal. They will likely flip, and take the Trump lawyers down with them. The result of this scandal and the 1864 abortion law will be that Arizona moves from purple to a bluer purple. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Just now, Yellowtail said: So, what are the charges? I'm 34 I just posted the charging document for you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Gee, fake electors were charged in Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan. And now Arizona. Guess what, they were charged with being fake electors. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 53 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: The charges are basically forgery and conspiracy to do so. I saw the video of the fake electors, so I'm pretty sure they are guilty. Many will flip. Some of the fake electors were duped - they were assured by Trump lawyers that signing the documents was legal. They will likely flip, and take the Trump lawyers down with them. The result of this scandal and the 1864 abortion law will be that Arizona moves from purple to a bluer purple. So, no sedition or insurrection, thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellowtail Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 Just now, Danderman123 said: Gee, fake electors were charged in Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan. And now Arizona. Guess what, they were charged with being fake electors. So, no sedition or insurrection, thanks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 17 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: So, no sedition or insurrection, thanks. Not for the Arizona cases. The suspects were not charged with storming the Capitol. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted April 28 Share Posted April 28 1 hour ago, Yellowtail said: No, it just means that they are lying when they claim they know what the charges are. If lying bothers you so much, why do you support Trump? He lies more than anyone outside a lunatic asylum? Why don't you call out his lies? Why bother with some random poster here when a presidential candidate is lying? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Walker88 Posted April 28 Popular Post Share Posted April 28 (edited) 1 hour ago, Danderman123 said: If lying bothers you so much, why do you support Trump? He lies more than anyone outside a lunatic asylum? Why don't you call out his lies? Why bother with some random poster here when a presidential candidate is lying? More proof---as if you needed any---that trumpers are willfully ignorant. It's 2024. Most people know how to search. Most people, however, are not trumpers. trumpers only know what their messiah or Fox tells them. They lack the intellect to have an original, coherent thought. If the troll reads this, he can find the indictment by following this LINK. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/24/arizona-fake-electors-indictment-read-the-document/73447956007/ I suspect trumpers will be challenged by the document, as it isn't a 3 or 4 word slogan, which is about the limit of what they can comprehend. I suspect that you, like me, went through a lot of life kind of forgetting there was a left of the mean on the IQ Bell Curve. It took the rise of trump to remind us they're out there, godbless'em. Not everybody wins the Birth Lottery. Edited April 28 by Walker88 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.4fd22303fa94eb0a6ebf5a9cf7194eb4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now