G_Money Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 1 minute ago, Danderman123 said: So, you think any of Trump's adulterous acts are okay, because someone else somewhere else committed sex crimes? Really? Once again you try and put words into people’s mouths. Back at you. Do you?
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 5 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said: I understand that it is a good show for the prosecutor to bring her to court and let her talk. But is that really important? He is accused of falsifying business records to influence the election. Does anybody have to hear from her what he was wearing on that day and how he behaved to make up their mind if he falsified business records or not? It's like when one person in a couple admits that they had extramarital sex. Is it really necessary to tell all the details of when and how? Or is it enough to admit that sex happened? Details are irrelevant. Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility. 1 1 1 1
G_Money Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: There are only twelve opinions that matter. Your most intelligent answer to date. And yours isn’t one of them. 1 1
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: So, you think any of Trump's adulterous acts are okay, because someone else somewhere else committed sex crimes? Really? He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. Had he had called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 1 1 1 2
Yellowtail Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 8 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility. Some who?
Popular Post HappyExpat57 Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 11 minutes ago, G_Money said: And can you provide proof/links that the links I provided from Fox are false? I didn’t think so. Next. I stopped wasting my time on "Fox" viewers long ago. They are obviously NOT interested in facts or truth. Duh. 4 1
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit. 4 1 4
Popular Post Presto Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 9 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said: "I used to try cases for a living. I still have a pretty good sense of what evidence is relevant, what is prejudicial and what is completely over-the-top inadmissible. What the judge is letting in today in the Trump trial in NYC will be remembered as a dark stain on our judicial system, reminiscent of corrupt dictatorships. Shame on the prosecution for undermining our judicial system," David Friedman, a lawyer and former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration, posted on X. Fervently defending your hero till the bitter end, right? 3
Popular Post Presto Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 8 hours ago, Tug said: Poor poor trump so mistreated gee wizz you’d think hoseing a porn star as the wife stays home taking care of the new born was bad…..then trying to hide it during the election and using campaign funds to pay for it was bad go figure.and this is by far the least serious of the crimes he’s been indicted for…..ditch the albatross enough is enough lock him up I'm not sure 'hoseing' is the correct term here, considering Trump's tiny pecker and impressive gut, that might get in the way of all the fun. 3
Popular Post Yellowtail Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit. Had he called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. 1 1 4
Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 50 minutes ago, Eric Loh said: Policies. Give me a break. Didn't know that you are comedian. Well we know that the present occupier of the Oval Office has the exact opposite policies. You must be one of those student loan beggers hahahahahahaha 2
Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 24 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Remember that some did not believe her going into today. So details are important to establish credibility. Spoken like an ignorant layman who gets his legal knowledge from the TV 1 1
Popular Post Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 17 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: This lady’s and gentlemen is the alternate universe Trump supporters inhabit. Yeah, reality 1 2 4
Presto Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 6 hours ago, pomchop said: finally a judge that seems to have a set of gonads....suck it up donnie your verdict day is coming soon...your hot shot lawyers are running out of attempts to delay or destroy this case. look on the bright side donnie...you can soon whine and wimper and wag your mouth about how the entire judicials system is rigged against you and everyone and all the evidence is fake....oh thats right you already do that for years....never has there been a more innocent man than DJT....everyone without a red maga hat is out to get you. We'll have to see about Merchans gonads. He admonished Trump, in court, about contempt of court again (Trump's behavior in court, yesterday), but no action followed. 1 1
Popular Post Eric Loh Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 10 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Well we know that the present occupier of the Oval Office has the exact opposite policies. You must be one of those student loan beggers hahahahahahaha That is a tacit agreement that Trump has no policies; he just hijacked Biden's policies and say the opposite. 3 1
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 30 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: He's not on trial for having an affair, he's on trial for having beaten Hillary Clinton. Had he had called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. I'll type slowly so you understand. The Clinton campaign did label the Fusion payments as campaign expenses, but the subcategory was legal expenses rather than opposition research. Trump, however, attempted to disguise a campaign expense as a business expense. 2 1
Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said: That is a tacit agreement that Trump has no policies; he just hijacked Biden's policies and say the opposite. Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board 1
Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: I'll type slowly so you understand. The Clinton campaign did label the Fusion payments as campaign expenses, but the subcategory was legal expenses rather than opposition research. Trump, however, attempted to disguise a campaign expense as a business expense. Yep. Legal knowledge from TV LOL. Hey genius, who decides whether the Great Orange Nightmare's payment to Sloppy Stormy is a campaign expense? (Watch this one)
Popular Post Lacessit Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said: Hearsay. Another girl who did have non-adulterous sex with Trump during the almost 6 years between his 2nd and 3rd marriage could have told her. From the evidence thus far, Trump is a tightwad that wants to know where every cent is. So why would he shell out $130,000 for something completely baseless? 1 1 2
Eric Loh Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 4 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board This is so rich for someone who troll incessantly dross postings. 1 1
Popular Post JCauto Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 7 hours ago, jerrymahoney said: Her testimony is just that. No corroborable evidence that the encounter was as she described. You expect there to be evidence from a third party to a two-party horizontal tango? But I reckon there would be hotel rooms being booked by said person, evidence that they were in the same town at the same time etc. So we'll just wait for the devastating evidence to be presented by the Trump Defense lawyers to disprove it. After all, he can easily disprove these intimate details, right? 1 1 1 1
Danderman123 Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 8 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Yep. Legal knowledge from TV LOL. Hey genius, who decides whether the Great Orange Nightmare's payment to Sloppy Stormy is a campaign expense? (Watch this one) Ultimately, the FEC. Which they did. 1 1
Lacessit Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 26 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Yeah, reality Kraepelin's paranoia: "the furtive development, resulting from inner causes, of a lasting, immovable delusional system that is accompanied by the complete retention of clearness and order in thinking, willing and acting" Does seem to fit many Trump supporters, doesn't it? 1 1
Popular Post Thingamabob Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 Daniels' lawyer says her accusations have been known for years. That doesn't make them honest. Personally, while not a fan of Trump, I believe very little of what Daniels is saying. 1 1 2
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 35 minutes ago, Yellowtail said: Had he called a personal NDA a campaign expense, it would have been called illegal, and he'd be in court for it. Meanwhile, no one give a whit that Hillary Clinton hired the DNC to pay the Perkins Coie law firm to pay Fusions GPS to pay Christopher Steel who was a British subject, a foreign national who was forbidden by statute to work for a Presidential campaign to collect a false dossier and seed it, and then she wrote the whole thing off not a campaign expense, but as a legal expense. Is Hilary receiving free accommodation in your head a permissible campaign contribution I wonder? 1 4
Danderman123 Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 Why did Trump wait until he ran for President that he sought an NDA from Stormy Daniels? If he simply wanted to hide the affair from Melania, why didn't he tell Stormy Daniels to keep quiet from Day One? 1 1
Popular Post Presto Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 36 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Quit being such a sizeist, Im fat and repulsive and have a pecker that best resembles a straw mushroom but I can make a girl scream just by walking in the room. I figured already you have serious issues. 1 2
Popular Post stevenl Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 22 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Congrats. You have just written the dumbest thing I have ever seen on a message Board A pity you don't read back your own posts then. 1 1 1 2 2
Popular Post Lacessit Posted May 8, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 8, 2024 6 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: Daniels' lawyer says her accusations have been known for years. That doesn't make them honest. Personally, while not a fan of Trump, I believe very little of what Daniels is saying. Apparently she can describe Trump's genitalia very accurately. If she is lying about that, all Trump needs to discredit her is a photo shoot under legal supervision. IMO that's as likely to happen as him taking the witness stand. 1 1 2 1 1
Yagoda Posted May 8, 2024 Posted May 8, 2024 11 minutes ago, stevenl said: A pity you don't read back your own posts then. What a brilliant riposte! The Don Rickles of your Mommy's basement! 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now