Breach of Trust: Chinese Police Escorted Australian Resident Back to China

[Social Media]

 

Chinese police were permitted entry into Australia by the federal police, leading to the escorting of a Chinese-born Australian resident back to China for trial. This revelation, unveiled in a recent Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, has sparked condemnation from Australian politicians concerned about potential threats to national security.

 

The Incident: Chinese police, acting under the guise of an anti-corruption operation known as Operation Fox Hunt, entered Australia in 2019 to apprehend a 59-year-old Australian resident of Chinese descent named Wang. Despite claiming to target "economic criminals," Operation Fox Hunt has drawn criticism for its alleged use in silencing dissidents and abducting individuals globally.

 

Alarming Response: Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson expressed alarm over what he termed an "extrajudicial extradition" facilitated by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The incident has raised concerns about coercive measures by foreign governments on Australian soil.

 

Political Backlash: Federal politicians, including Labor MP Peter Khalil and Greens Senator David Shoebridge, have condemned the breach, calling it "deeply disturbing" and "utterly incredible." Critics argue that allowing Chinese police onto Australian shores poses significant risks, given China's record of pursuing dissidents abroad.

 

Opaque Agreements: The AFP's engagement with Chinese security agencies, including the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), has come under scrutiny. While the AFP has confirmed agreements with Chinese agencies, the details remain undisclosed. Paterson and Shoebridge demand full disclosure to understand the extent of such arrangements and their implications for Australian residents.

 

Call for Transparency: Amidst growing concerns, there are calls for transparency regarding the AFP's interactions with Chinese authorities. Paterson warns against naivety in trusting Chinese agencies and stresses the need for strict oversight to protect Australian interests and residents.

 

Unveiling Interference: Khalil underscores the broader issue of Chinese government interference in Australia, labeling it as part of an "iceberg" of foreign influence activities. The AFP's reluctance to divulge details raises questions about the extent of Chinese interference and its impact on Australian sovereignty.

 

Rule of Law: While the AFP maintains its commitment to Australian law and protecting the community, questions linger about the legality and ethics of its actions. The case highlights the delicate balance between international cooperation and safeguarding national interests.

 

Uncertain Fate: Wang's current whereabouts remain unknown, raising concerns about her well-being and legal status. The case underscores the complexity of extradition and mutual assistance treaties and underscores the need for robust legal frameworks to navigate such challenges.

 

 

Credit: ABC AU 2024-05-15

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

[cncltd1973]

Chinese sleeper spy that went rogue and turned Aussie? or was he high level criming in Oz?

[stevenl]

1 minute ago, cncltd1973 said:

Chinese sleeper spy that went rogue and turned Aussie? or was he high level criming in Oz?

He is a she.

Good you're asking questions because you're giving the impression your knowledge is limited.

[mfd101]

Western countries all slow to wake up to a new world order that is not in their interest.

[Classic Ray]

Diplomacy and police work both demand cooperation with other countries with whom you don’t always agree.

 

Provided safeguards are in place to differentiate between politically and criminally motivated expulsions, these actions must continue. It could be that Australia will need to ask China in future cases to return some Australian criminals. Cooperation goes both ways.

[stevenl]

1 hour ago, Classic Ray said:

Diplomacy and police work both demand cooperation with other countries with whom you don’t always agree.

 

Provided safeguards are in place to differentiate between politically and criminally motivated expulsions, these actions must continue. It could be that Australia will need to ask China in future cases to return some Australian criminals. Cooperation goes both ways.

Shouldn't she have been expelled from Australia then and put on a plane to China? Why were the Chinese coppers detaining her on Australian soil?

[cncltd1973]

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Shouldn't she have been expelled from Australia then and put on a plane to China? Why were the Chinese coppers detaining her on Australian soil?

Good you're asking questions because you're giving the impression your knowledge is limited.

[stevenl]

5 minutes ago, cncltd1973 said:

Good you're asking questions because you're giving the impression your knowledge is limited.

At least I know it's a woman.
But you're right, I deserved that.

[newbee2022]

6 hours ago, Social Media said:

 

Chinese police were permitted entry into Australia by the federal police, leading to the escorting of a Chinese-born Australian resident back to China for trial. This revelation, unveiled in a recent Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, has sparked condemnation from Australian politicians concerned about potential threats to national security.

 

The Incident: Chinese police, acting under the guise of an anti-corruption operation known as Operation Fox Hunt, entered Australia in 2019 to apprehend a 59-year-old Australian resident of Chinese descent named Wang. Despite claiming to target "economic criminals," Operation Fox Hunt has drawn criticism for its alleged use in silencing dissidents and abducting individuals globally.

 

Alarming Response: Shadow Home Affairs Minister James Paterson expressed alarm over what he termed an "extrajudicial extradition" facilitated by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The incident has raised concerns about coercive measures by foreign governments on Australian soil.

 

Political Backlash: Federal politicians, including Labor MP Peter Khalil and Greens Senator David Shoebridge, have condemned the breach, calling it "deeply disturbing" and "utterly incredible." Critics argue that allowing Chinese police onto Australian shores poses significant risks, given China's record of pursuing dissidents abroad.

 

Opaque Agreements: The AFP's engagement with Chinese security agencies, including the Ministry of Public Security (MPS), has come under scrutiny. While the AFP has confirmed agreements with Chinese agencies, the details remain undisclosed. Paterson and Shoebridge demand full disclosure to understand the extent of such arrangements and their implications for Australian residents.

 

Call for Transparency: Amidst growing concerns, there are calls for transparency regarding the AFP's interactions with Chinese authorities. Paterson warns against naivety in trusting Chinese agencies and stresses the need for strict oversight to protect Australian interests and residents.

 

Unveiling Interference: Khalil underscores the broader issue of Chinese government interference in Australia, labeling it as part of an "iceberg" of foreign influence activities. The AFP's reluctance to divulge details raises questions about the extent of Chinese interference and its impact on Australian sovereignty.

 

Rule of Law: While the AFP maintains its commitment to Australian law and protecting the community, questions linger about the legality and ethics of its actions. The case highlights the delicate balance between international cooperation and safeguarding national interests.

 

Uncertain Fate: Wang's current whereabouts remain unknown, raising concerns about her well-being and legal status. The case underscores the complexity of extradition and mutual assistance treaties and underscores the need for robust legal frameworks to navigate such challenges.

 

 

Credit: ABC AU 2024-05-15

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

What a mess. I thought Australia is independent and not yet boot licking China.🙏

[klauskunkel]

5 hours ago, stevenl said:

At least I know it's a woman.

not "it's a woman", "she's a woman"