41 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

Show me where I have ever supported Trump with one of my comments. 

 

 

 

I did but you still deny it. Trolling?

32 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Digging deeper and deeper into the cult of personality - incomprehensible. Just read Republican representatives booed Capital police who were present on Jan 6th who were being recognised by the Pennsylvanian State House. Goes to show the awful influence of trump, yet you and others still support him. trump is utterly unfit to represent the Office of the President of the USA.

 

Officers who defended the Capitol on Jan. 6 booed at Pennsylvania state House. Republicans jeered at former Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and former U.S. Capitol Police Sgt. Aquilino Gonell as they were visiting the state House.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/officers-defended-capitol-jan-6-booed-pennsylvania-state-house-rcna155964

 

Will not respond any further to you.

So much for the party of law and order. BS.

5 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I did but you still deny it. Trolling?

 

no you didn't that is a flat out lie.

6 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

Faux news isn't an outlet known for reliable information. Quite the contrary. Sad so many fall for it

 

again you did not answer. is the information provided in the link correct or not ? that's all that matters. 

On 6/6/2024 at 5:54 PM, stoner said:

if you say so. he is up on charges that can bring 25 years in prison. not exactly a small sentence for what you are claiming is a small issue.

 

i wonder when the next mass shooting happens will you cry for less regulation. 

I didn't claim it's a small issue. I provided evidence that Lindsey Graham thinks it's something not worth pursuing and that the data shows it's an offence that's very rarely prosecuted. I didn't express any opinion on it myself. 

 

Nor did I say or even imply that there should be less regulation.

 

Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit.

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

you are splitting hairs now. 

No. Agents represent their administration, not ex-agents.

 

And it did actually present earmarks of Russian disinformation: laptop content brought up by Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine; copy of laptop given only to the NYPost shortly before the election, so no one could check it, etc....

 

It looks like Giuliani had done all he could to suggest it was a Russian disinformation. 😀

7 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

I didn't claim it's a small issue. I provided evidence that Lindsey Graham thinks it's something not worth pursuing and that the data shows it's an offence that's very rarely prosecuted. I didn't express any opinion on it myself. 

 

Nor did I say or even imply that there should be less regulation.

 

Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit.

 

you were pushing his words... same thing. no one said you implied less regulation. i asked a question. seems we both have comprehension issues eh. 

5 minutes ago, candide said:

No. Agents represent their administration, not ex-agents.

 

And it did actually present earmarks of Russian disinformation: laptop content brought up by Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine; copy of laptop given only to the NYPost shortly before the election, so no one could check it, etc....

 

It looks like Giuliani had done all he could to suggest it was a Russian disinformation. 😀

 

that is your opinion regarding earmarks due to your political leanings. fact is that the laptop is very damning. that's all that matters. 

 

i wonder what else is going to come from it. interesting times ahead indeed. 

2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

https://judiciary.house.gov/media/in-the-news/biden-campaign-blinken-orchestrated-intel-letter-discredit-hunter-biden-laptop

What a joke! Jim Jordan was caught lying about it by editing the testimony! 😀

Here's the unedited part of the testimony in which Morrel replies to Jim Jordan.

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

 

Edited June 7, 20242 yr by candide

13 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

that is your opinion regarding earmarks due to your political leanings. fact is that the laptop is very damning. that's all that matters. 

 

i wonder what else is going to come from it. interesting times ahead indeed. 

What I have mentioned are facts.

 

BTW  very damning about what, exactly?

Edited June 7, 20242 yr by candide

2 minutes ago, candide said:

What a joke! Jim Jordan was caught lying about by editing the testimony! 😀

Here's the unedited part of the testimony in which Morrel replies to Jim Jordan.

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

 

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

Just now, candide said:

What I have mentioned are facts.

 

BTW  very damning about what, exactly?

 

what you mentioned is your opinion not fact. you think that it has the earmarks of russian bla bla bla. that's it. you think it. doesn't make it so. 

 

very damning that for years dems blabbed on about laptop this and laptop that as bs. numerous threads on here with loads of comments from dems going on and on about how the laptop is not real or russian garbage. now we know it is true and the laptop is real. it exists and has damning information on it. 

 

those are the facts. 

 

 

20 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

I guess your memory is Jim Jordan's tweet editing the testimony. 😀

 

No 404 about this link, I just checked. Plenty of other articles available, too.

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

again you did not answer. is the information provided in the link correct or not ? that's all that matters. 

I asked you for the information and all you provided was a link to a dodgy media outlet. I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop. Just a bunch of conspiracy theories from wacky right wing media outlets

22 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

what you mentioned is your opinion not fact. you think that it has the earmarks of russian bla bla bla. that's it. you think it. doesn't make it so. 

 

very damning that for years dems blabbed on about laptop this and laptop that as bs. numerous threads on here with loads of comments from dems going on and on about how the laptop is not real or russian garbage. now we know it is true and the laptop is real. it exists and has damning information on it. 

 

those are the facts. 

 

 

Not the facts at all.

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I asked you for the information and all you provided was a link to a dodgy media outlet. I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop. Just a bunch of conspiracy theories from wacky right wing media outlets

 

was the dodgy link not also put up by the US government site ? 

1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

Not the facts at all.

 

ok.

1 minute ago, stoner said:

 

was the dodgy link not also put up by the US government site ? 

By a committee run by nutter Republicans. And just a copy from Faux News. Wow...missed that one I guess?

5 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I've yet to see definitive proof of what was on the laptop.

 

coming soon don't worry. now that it is established that the laptop is in fact real and is being used as evidence against the felony charged fiend addict son of the president. (see how i did that)

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

By a committee run by nutter Republicans. And just a copy from Faux News. Wow...missed that one I guess?

 

your opinion noted. no i did not miss that. as i am fully aware and my response has shown so. smh. 

 

 

Edited June 7, 20242 yr by stoner

5 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

coming soon don't worry. now that it is established that the laptop is in fact real and is being used as evidence against the felony charged fiend addict son of the president. (see how i did that)

They did an extensive review of the laptop. It's passed through so many hands that there is no way to verify what is or was on it.

 

P.S. you won't read that on Faux News

Dr Phil nails it.

 

'A big issue': Dr. Phil on Trump teasing retribution against political foes

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/politics/video/dr-phil-trump-retribution-interview-newsnight-digvid

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

They did an extensive review of the laptop. It's passed through so many hands that there is no way to verify what is or was on it.

 

P.S. you won't read that on Faux News

 

Let the excuses been. You sound like a trumper now. 

13 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

Let the excuses been. You sound like a trumper now. 

What excuses. Just the facts. Something that evades some on this forum.

 

Read this. Please.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

What excuses. Just the facts. Something that evades some on this forum.

 

Read this. Please.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/

 

paywall. 

A post with a headline with no supporting link to the source of "information" has been removed.  Please provide a valid link when posting.

28 minutes ago, stoner said:

 

paywall. 

Nope

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

 

Jim Jordan Just Got Busted With Evidence Of His Hunter Biden Lies

 

Jim Jordan and House Judiciary Republicans got caught editing witness interviews to smear the Sec. of State and push their Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

2 hours ago, stoner said:

 

hahah it's not my memory that he said that. 

 

ok. 

 

plus 404 on your link. 

Here's Jim Jordan's tweet. You can easily see on the second page that he put together two unrelated parts of the transcript (one being from the part I posted before).

 

Lol! It's so obvious. The loser is not even able to edit it properly. 😀

 

 

26 minutes ago, candide said:

Here's Jim Jordan's tweet. You can easily see on the second page that he put together two unrelated parts of the transcript (one being from the part I posted before).

 

Lol! It's so obvious. The loser is not even able to edit it properly. 😀

 

 

Jordan is a horrible politician. Stunning anyone likes him