Jump to content

Thailand is 'shocked' by Kyiv hospital attack


webfact

Recommended Posts

What about Myanmar? Lol.

UN?

UN-reliable, UN-nessecairy,

UN-important,

UN-trustworthy!

A useless enterprise of obsolete, toothless, crooked hypocrites.

TiT used to be on its radar.

But, in between, it fits very well with this "talking" club.

Surprise?

 

Edited by Maitdjai
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2024 at 10:50 AM, MalcolmB said:

I have been getting used to this sort of thing after watching every clinic and hospital in Gaza bombed over the last 9 months in near-daily attacks.

At least the Ukrainians can relocate the injured to other hospitals with medicine, unlike in Gaza.

If that were true, many more (Ham)asholes would be taken out! These creeps don't care about collateral damage, and they're wasting their so-called "civilians" deliberately.

Find the failure.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Maitdjai said:

If that were true, many more (Ham)asholes would be taken out! These creeps don't care about collateral damage, and they're wasting their so-called "civilians" deliberately.

Find the failure.

 

 

 

It isn’t Hamas slaughtering all the Palestinian women and children.

It is the Israeli Army. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MalcolmB said:

It isn’t Hamas slaughtering all the Palestinian women and children.

It is the Israeli Army. 

Hamas is hiding in urban areas, inside some hospitals and just mixing with the civilian population.  They are breaking the rules of war, such as they are.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fortean1 said:

Hamas is hiding in urban areas, inside some hospitals and just mixing with the civilian population.  They are breaking the rules of war, such as they are.

According to the IDF. Any excuse for slaughtering innocent civilians. They seem to actually enjoy it. Certainly elements of the Israeli government would like to see a totally ethnically cleansed Palestine ready for the invading ultra orthodox Jews to take over. So who are the Nazis now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2024 at 2:55 PM, hotchilli said:

 

Before the invasion started there was a peace treaty ready to be signed on the table... certain nations made sure it was ignored.

You mean the Istanbul Accords? Apparently a non starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/14/2024 at 5:13 AM, hotchilli said:

Doing what big brother USA wanted... even Tony Blair showed up..

USA had put a spanner in the works inside Ukraine long before this war started, which led to Zelensky being given the top job.

Rubbish. Where'd you copy that from? Always blame the USA, right? Zelensky wasn't "given the top job". He was elected. Where do you get this crap from?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bradiston said:

Rubbish. Where'd you copy that from? Always blame the USA, right? Zelensky wasn't "given the top job". He was elected. Where do you get this crap from?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volodymyr_Zelenskyy

You really do need to brush up on your history... USA are one of the biggest war mongers out there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/14/2024 at 1:20 AM, bradiston said:

Putin supported them because the Donbas is strategically and resourcefully important.

It certainly is - outside the geological world, a lesser known fact is that the whole Donbas region contains large quantities of 'rare earth metals'. I don't think that escaped Putin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, bradiston said:

I might have known this crud would rear his ugly head. Rubbish! You need to stop watching YouTube videos. What a time waster.

You need to stop believing Wiki is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hotchilli said:

You need to stop believing Wiki is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.. 

At least a Wikipedia article has any amount of links to sources, related articles, and further reading. A YouTube video has nothing. The author can spout any old rubbish with impunity. There's no backup, nothing. You believe it if it fits your own take. Usually if somebody provides a link to such a source I just laugh and move on. It's always just an agenda based opinion. You might as well be watching a cartoon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...