JK Rowling Supports Legal Fight Against Workplace Gender Police

[Social Media]

 

Sara Morrison, a single mother from Belfast, felt discriminated against after participating in a gender-critical Let Women Speak rally. She turned to CrowdJustice, a crowdfunding platform, to raise funds for a tribunal against her employer, claiming she was forced out of work due to stress.

 

Morrison’s post, published earlier this summer, resonated with many: “I don’t believe that anybody should be discriminated against for having gender-critical views and talking about them.” It wasn’t long before her case caught the attention of JK Rowling, the Harry Potter creator, who shared her support on social media. Rowling’s endorsement quickly raised thousands of pounds for Morrison's case, doubling her initial £15,000 target with donations from over 1,000 backers. One donor expressed solidarity, saying, “I am a single mum currently going through similar with my employer of 20 years.”

 

On Mumsnet, where users use gardening metaphors to discreetly discuss fundraising due to site rules, support for Morrison grew. Messages like, “Pitiful carrot planted but let’s hope there’s a whole field of them,” and “Just did a little digging – can’t understand why these organisations don’t realize that they can’t treat workers like this,” reflected the community’s support. Simon Chambers, Morrison’s lawyer who also represents Graham Linehan, a co-writer of Father Ted, in a separate gender-critical discrimination case, stated that the additional funds would enable him to dedicate more resources to Morrison’s legal battle. This case is part of a larger trend where employees turn to public support for disputes that resonate on a broader scale.

 

 

Gender-critical discrimination cases, like Morrison’s, are garnering significant public backing as workers claim they are penalized for opposing transgender ideology or supporting women's rights. Elspeth Duemmer Wrigley, a government lawyer, raised £40,000 this year after being sued for stating that only women can have periods. The case was later dropped. Chambers pointed out legal concerns where staff are punished for holding views contrary to those of their company’s customers, noting that the law can feel secondary to consumer whims.

 

High-profile cases and support from celebrities and communities have amplified the reach of these legal battles. Ursula Doyle, a former editor at Hachette who claimed she was forced out for publishing Kathleen Stock’s gender-critical book “Material Girls,” raised almost £50,000 on CrowdJustice with significant support from Mumsnet users. Tanya de Grunwald, an advisor on employment issues, explained that the public's eagerness to back these cases stems from collective frustration. “People’s generosity isn’t pure altruism,” she said. “It’s a result of collective pent-up resentment that a large number of people have around these issues.”

 

CrowdJustice has become a powerful tool for those seeking legal redress. Unlike other crowdfunding platforms, the money raised goes directly to the lawyers. Dawn Bebe, head of Crowdfunder, which acquired CrowdJustice last year, reported a surge in activity on the platform, with the number of cases rising by 265% since 2015. The platform has raised £14 million since its inception in 2014, primarily for legal cases from individuals who couldn’t secure legal aid or fund their cases privately. “More and more people realize this is a legitimate way to raise money,” Bebe noted, emphasizing the platform's influence on case law and its potential to challenge the status quo.

 

 

As the government prepares for significant changes in workers’ rights, including granting full employment rights from the first day on the job, there is concern among employers about a potential rise in lawsuits. A City chairman expressed unease, feeling the pendulum has swung too far towards employees since the Covid-19 pandemic. However, lawyers representing mistreated workers argue that the rise of donation-based lawsuits reflects public frustration and willingness to support those they feel emotionally connected to.

 

Chambers highlighted the importance of personality-driven cases in crowdfunding success, stating, “Nobody is interested in a lawyer talking about a case – it has to be personality-driven by the claimants.” He believes that crowdfunding has given visibility to “weird and wonderful cases” that might have otherwise gone unnoticed. “Employers have had it good for an awful long time,” he said. “It’s a small swing back of the pendulum in the direction of the employee.”

 

As public support continues to grow, platforms like CrowdJustice are likely to play an increasingly significant role in shaping the legal landscape, empowering individuals to challenge perceived injustices and advocate for their rights.

 

Credit: Daily Telegraph  2024-08-06

 

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

[Chomper Higgot]

Getting fired for voicing personal opinions in the work place gives rise to a law suit because why?

 

Did Sara Morrison have some clause in her contract of employment that stated she’s employed to voice her personal opinions, or was she expected to perform other ‘work like’ duties while ‘on the clock’?

 

 

 

Edited August 6 by Chomper Higgot

[Scott Tracy]

There is no safe space at work. It's not what you're there for. Anything you say can and often will, be used against you.

[BritManToo]

Still no mention of what she did though.

I can't even work out what a 'gender-critical' offense could be.

 

Edit

OK, I've found it, it's believing men are men, and should use the men's toilets, even if they choose to wear a dress to work.

Sometimes called 'transphobic'.

Edited August 6 by BritManToo

[JonnyF]

Rowling is a hero. 

 

A true feminist, unlike many of the plastic feminists who support men putting on dresses and going into women's changing rooms. 

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Still no mention of what she did though.

I can't even work out what a 'gender-critical' offense could be.

 

She probably said something totally bigoted and unacceptable like "men have a penis and women have a vagina". 😃

[BritManToo]

Just now, JonnyF said:

She probably said something totally bigoted and unacceptable like "men have a penis and women have a vagina". 😃

Or even worse ........ 'what's that guy doing in the women's toilets (or the nurses changing rooms)'

[stevenl]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

She probably said something totally bigoted and unacceptable like "men have a penis and women have a vagina". 😃

So you disagree with your earlier opinion that the Algerian boxer is a man. After all she has a vagina.

[JonnyF]

Just now, stevenl said:

So you disagree with your earlier opinion that the Algerian boxer is a man. After all she has a vagina.

 

He does not have vagina.

 

He has xy chromosome though. 

[mogandave]

Anyone speaking contrary to the left should be terminated. 

 

Anyone speaking out in favor of the left should be promoted.

[Cameroni]

Unfortunately JK Rowling lost a lot of credibility when she went on a tweet rampage after the Khelif fight, calling that boxer a "man" repeatedly, when in fact it's  an intersex dudette with a vagina and probably testes as well. 

 

Her LGBTQ opponents will no doubt crucify her for this error.

[stevenl]

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

He does not have vagina.

 

He has xy chromosome though. 

Not true. She was classified as female at birth due to her vagina.

[JonnyF]

3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Not true. She was classified as female at birth due to her vagina.

 

He does not have a vagina. 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Still no mention of what she did though.

I can't even work out what a 'gender-critical' offense could be.

 

Edit

OK, I've found it, it's believing men are men, and should use the men's toilets, even if they choose to wear a dress to work.

Sometimes called 'transphobic'.

Nothing at all to do with the job she was paid to do would be my guess.

[WDSmart]

All of these problems concerning discrimination against trans people are equivalent to racism. Hopefully, and although the discriminatory feelings will probably never die out, just like racism, the laws will enforce equality for everyone regardless of their gender or their expression of their belief in their gender. 

[Scott Tracy]

4 hours ago, stevenl said:

So you disagree with your earlier opinion that the Algerian boxer is a man. After all she has a vagina.

You've been there? Who 're like it.

[mogandave]

7 hours ago, Scott Tracy said:

You've been there? Who 're like it.

Taste like chicken?

[mogandave]

7 hours ago, WDSmart said:

All of these problems concerning discrimination against trans people are equivalent to racism. Hopefully, and although the discriminatory feelings will probably never die out, just like racism, the laws will enforce equality for everyone regardless of their gender or their expression of their belief in their gender. 

So you support laws that mandate men that identify as women be allowed to compete in women’s sports? 

 

 

[WDSmart]

9 hours ago, mogandave said:

So you support laws that mandate men that identify as women be allowed to compete in women’s sports? 

 

 

I would support a rule (USA/International?) that clearly identifies what characteristics are used to classify someone as a "man" or "woman" and then allows the individual to compete only with their classified gender. I'm not so demanding about this when it concerns the use of public facilities, like public restrooms.