Going short-time only, shallow or succulent?

[Cameroni]

5 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

Only for those who are unable to navigate a safe path. The others give up, blame the women and go Short Time 😊

 

What if she wakes up one day and tells you it's over?

[Cameroni]

4 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Are you a MGTOW-type person? Respect if you are.

 

Lol, hell no. I'm into women. But sometimes I wish I were...lol

 

 

[Prubangboy]

Me too.

[StreetCowboy]

23 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

I think having a girl who is actually into you and isn't interested in your money is best. That's something you aren't going to experience.

Some people need money to survive, or to help their families survive, and regardless of how much they like you, it’s difficult to spend working hours with you, travel to your place of work or residence, without fulfilling their obligations.

If you can’t fulfil those requirements, it seems like you’re asking a poor girl for a pretty one-way relationship 

[StreetCowboy]

1 hour ago, NowNow said:

 

You do. You write what you imagine/fantasise about me in your every post. I don't imagine anything about you. You are less than nothing.

That seems a bit speculative - would you care to outline your evidence for that, or alternatively rephrase as “in my mind, you are less than…”

I am not sure that being consistently negative is such a bad thing, and you bless him with your discourse.

[NowNow]

3 minutes ago, StreetCowboy said:

Some people need money to survive, or to help their families survive, and regardless of how much they like you, it’s difficult to spend working hours with you, travel to your place of work or residence, without fulfilling their obligations.

If you can’t fulfil those requirements, it seems like you’re asking a poor girl for a pretty one-way relationship 

 

I read your post twice. Are you writing about girls who are poor? Why are you accusing me of choosing poor women? 

[RSD1]

34 minutes ago, NowNow said:

I think having a girl who is actually into you and isn't interested in your money is best.

Not everyone agrees. 
 

35 minutes ago, NowNow said:

That's something you aren't going to experience.

How would you know?

[RSD1]

29 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Are you a MGTOW-type person? Respect if you are.

That's actually an interesting point. Perhaps a large number of men, who see going short-time only as being succulent, do fall into that category. But they don't want to go onto PornTube every night for their biological needs so they look to prostitutes to get an occasional helping hand. 

[StreetCowboy]

4 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

I read your post twice. Are you writing about girls who are poor? Why are you accusing me of choosing poor women? 

Sorry - I was not accusing anyone  of anything.  I was just highlighting why some ladies might still need money to spend time with the love of their life, rather than working 7-11 ina grocery store, or 11 - 7 in a gogo bar

[RSD1]

7 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

I read your post twice. Are you writing about girls who are poor? Why are you accusing me of choosing poor women? 

All people agree that you should go short-time:

 

[RSD1]

5 minutes ago, StreetCowboy said:

Maybe you should keep your private posts to PMs.  If you post in the forums, you can expect forum

members to respond. 

He posted the following on the first page of this topic. He is conflicted. 

 

2 minutes ago, NowNow said:

Obsessed? It's a discussion board and we are discussing. You really haven't got the hang of this thing yet.

 

[StreetCowboy]

3 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

and? How does that stop her from being into you? I don't understand what you are trying to convey?

It does not.  But if you can’t provide the money that she needs to fulfil her obligations, she will have to go elsewhere, despite her disappointment and broken affections.

When I say “you” I am speaking generally “ one” - not specific to you 

[Cameroni]

22 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

That's actually an interesting point. Perhaps a large number of men, who see going short-time only as being succulent, do fall into that category. But they don't want to go onto PornTube every night for their biological needs so they look to prostitutes to get an occasional helping hand. 

 

I don't think a large number of men are MGTOW. It's always been a tiny minority. Quite an extreme option.

 

 

[RSD1]

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I don't think a large number of men are MGTOW. It's always been a tiny minority. Quite an extreme option.

 

 

I was thinking more of a man who doesn't want to have a long term relationship with a woman. 

[StreetCowboy]

This thread was the first time I’d heard “MGOTW”.  For blokes that don’t care about women, they seem quite misogynistically obsessed. 

[Prubangboy]

10 minutes ago, StreetCowboy said:

This thread was the first time I’d heard “MGOTW”.  For blokes that don’t care about women, they seem quite misogynistically obsessed. 

Gotta agree.

 

If you are in fact a Man Going Your Own Way, at some point, you do have to actually shuffle off and go some version of your own way.

 

You can't keep looking over your shoulder, hoping that women will notice (and regret!) that you have left the playing field. Tho I do respect the very stoic renunciation aspect of what they're saying.

 

Downgrading women as a life focus can make some sense for some men, and possibl7 for most men at some point in their lives.

 

Post recent painful breakup, I am def in some version of monk mode. I doubt it will be permanent, but at 72, you never know. I'm not angry at women, or my ex. I just want to be off the merry go round for an indeterminate while. 

 

And it feels very chill. I have been chasing women for 60 years. The only thing I have liked longer is chocolate chip cookies -which I am also giving a hard miss of late.

[SoCal1990]

Stop the debating, join the poll:

 

 

[NowNow]

40 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Every time I'm going to type a reply to one of your posts, I need to first lower my IQ by about 50 points. I'm not sure how much longer I can continue to put myself through that.

 

I've certainly noticed. 

[NowNow]

24 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Gotta agree.

 

If you are in fact a Man Going Your Own Way, at some point, you do have to actually shuffle off and go some version of your own way.

 

You can't keep looking over your shoulder, hoping that women will notice (and regret!) that you have left the playing field. Tho I do respect the very stoic renunciation aspect of what they're saying.

 

Downgrading women as a life focus can make some sense for some men, and possibl7 for most men at some point in their lives.

 

Post recent painful breakup, I am def in some version of monk mode. I doubt it will be permanent, but at 72, you never know. I'm not angry at women, or my ex. I just want to be off the merry go round for an indeterminate while. 

 

And it feels very chill. I have been chasing women for 60 years. The only thing I have liked longer is chocolate chip cookies -which I am also giving a hard miss of late.

 

I've got some triple and quadruple chocolate cookies you would like. 

 

[NowNow]

1 hour ago, StreetCowboy said:

It does not.  But if you can’t provide the money that she needs to fulfil her obligations, she will have to go elsewhere, despite her disappointment and broken affections.

When I say “you” I am speaking generally “ one” - not specific to you 

 

I don't understand what you are talking about. Are you referring to your own experience? My girls don't need my money. 

 

[Cameroni]

44 minutes ago, Prubangboy said:

Post recent painful breakup, I am def in some version of monk mode.

 

Ain't no love in the heart of the city
Ain't no love in the heart of town
Ain't no love and it sure is a pity
Ain't no love cause you ain't around

Every place that I go
Oh, it seems so strange
Without you there
Things have changed
The nighttime calls
There's a blanket of gloom
Another teardrop falls
In my lonely room

Ain't no love in the heart of the city
Ain't no love in the heart of town
Ain't no love and it sure is a pity

[save the frogs]

6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Quite wrong. There was a time when women did not go with men for money.

 

I am not sure where you are getting that from.

Presumably in the hunter days, men did all or most of the hunting and women would starve if men did not share the kill with them.

But also presumably, women helped out in the local tribe in other ways.

 

[jacob29]

6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

No prostitute could ever come close. Because they don't care about you. Only your money.

Given the volume of men complaining about lack of sex period in their marriage, pretty obviously not a hard rule.

 

Never mind that some of the most affectionate women I've known, have quite possibly been somewhat asexual. No amount of care for you is going to help overcome that, and why would you want that anyway?

[RSD1]

59 minutes ago, jacob29 said:

Given the volume of men complaining about lack of sex period in their marriage, pretty obviously not a hard rule.

 

Never mind that some of the most affectionate women I've known, have quite possibly been somewhat asexual. No amount of care for you is going to help overcome that, and why would you want that anyway?

Some of the best, off-the-charts sex I've ever had was with girls on the game in Thailand, hands down. 

[BritManToo]

6 hours ago, NowNow said:

 

I don't understand what you are talking about. Are you referring to your own experience? My girls don't need my money. 

 

Yeah, but you're in London, and there's plenty of made up jobs or welfare.

[save the frogs]

1 hour ago, RSD1 said:

Some of the best, off-the-charts sex I've ever had was with girls on the game in Thailand, hands down. 

 

Are they enthusiastic because they're trying to secure a long-term boyfriend?

Maybe not all the time, but that's my impression. They're auditioning for being a real girlfriend some of them.

And it works quite well, which is why many men end up dating and marrying them. 

 

[NowNow]

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Yeah, but you're in London, and there's plenty of made up jobs or welfare.

 

How is it possible that you lot get it so wrong, EVERY time? 😊

[ElwoodP]

Personal attacks removed.

 

Edit: Along with the poster.

[NowNow]

9 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

What if she wakes up one day and tells you it's over?

 

Part of your growth....or you could just do what many here did and move to Thailand to buy or rent themselves a woman.

[In Full Agreement]

On 8/21/2024 at 11:22 AM, fredwiggy said:

Make a boy pay and he'll be more likely to use protection from then on.

 

 

Maybe make the birth control pills super inexpensive while you're at it.