Goldman Sachs says Comrade Kamala is better for economy. She can't even do communism right!

[Inderpland]

Goldman Sachs says Comrade Kamala is better for economy. She can't even do communism right!

 

Goldman Sachs says that a Harris victory in November would boost the U.S. economy while a Trump victory would be a “hit to growth.”👏

 

[maesariang]

4 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Goldman Sachs says Comrade Kamala is better for economy. She can't even do communism right!

 

Goldman Sachs says that a Harris victory in November would boost the U.S. economy while a Trump victory would be a “hit to growth.”👏

 

Goldman Sachs are crooks

[maesariang]

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/11/goldman-sachs-2008-financial-crisis-mortagage-backed-securities

 

Gfc crooks

[Captain Monday]

 

Somebody did his homework for him at Wharton, obviously, as he has no understanding of the basics . If actually implemented Trump's planned import tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportation program would crash the US economy and spawn a severe global effects.  He is a menace.

[maesariang]

20 minutes ago, Captain Monday said:

 

Somebody did his homework for him at Wharton, obviously, as he has no understanding of the basics . If actually implemented Trump's planned import tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportation program would crash the US economy and spawn a severe global effects.  He is a menace.

He had the best US economy in 50 years.

[TedG]

22 minutes ago, Captain Monday said:

 

Somebody did his homework for him at Wharton, obviously, as he has no understanding of the basics . If actually implemented Trump's planned import tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportation program would crash the US economy and spawn a severe global effects.  He is a menace.

Then on the flip side Harris wants prices controls and the Biden/Harris admin gave us the gift of inflation. 

[Inderpland]

30 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Goldman Sachs are crooks

As you're a diehard follower of Trump (a failed and crooked businessman) I guess that makes you a fan then.

[Captain Monday]

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

He had the best US economy in 50 years.

You don't believe that nonsense.

 

[maesariang]

8 minutes ago, Captain Monday said:

You don't believe that nonsense.

 

True. Best inflation and unemployment in 50 years. Proven fact. The fact you don't know this means you don't read the facts only the left wing views.

[Hamus Yaigh]

Look at the past 50 years of US market data and the markets rose more during Democrat presidents and less so during Republican. Market data don't lie.

[Captain Monday]

11 minutes ago, maesariang said:

True. Best inflation and unemployment in 50 years. Proven fact. The fact you don't know this means you don't read the facts only the left wing views.

Yeah. Sure. Tell me about it.

Perhaps you could provide a link?

[maesariang]

1 minute ago, Captain Monday said:

Yeah. Sure. Tell me about it.

Perhaps you could provide a link?

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/u-s-unemployment-rate-falls-50-year-low/

[mdr224]

13 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Look at the past 50 years of US market data and the markets rose more during Democrat presidents and less so during Republican. Market data don't lie.

Only spending rose under democrats to pay for all those unnecessary wars

[Captain Monday]

7 minutes ago, maesariang said:

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/u-s-unemployment-rate-falls-50-year-low/

Propaganda from the greatest liar in American political history? Shirley you can't be serious?  Now we know you are just pulling our legs and not even worth the ignore list , cobber.

 

 

[stuandjulie]

2 hours ago, Inderpland said:

Goldman Sachs says Comrade Kamala is better for economy. She can't even do communism right!

 

Goldman Sachs says that a Harris victory in November would boost the U.S. economy while a Trump victory would be a “hit to growth.”👏

 

Another Yank who wouldn't know communism if it hit them in the face.

[tilaceer]

12 minutes ago, maesariang said:

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/u-s-unemployment-rate-falls-50-year-low/

That article was written in 2019.

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, Inderpland said:

Goldman Sachs says Comrade Kamala is better for economy. She can't even do communism right!

 

Goldman Sachs says that a Harris victory in November would boost the U.S. economy while a Trump victory would be a “hit to growth.”👏

 

Don't know about that, this share might do better...........

 

 

[Inderpland]

28 minutes ago, maesariang said:

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/u-s-unemployment-rate-falls-50-year-low/

You've linked to a site that hasn't been updated since October 2019!!

OK, you might have learned how to use Google but you really need to learn how to be a bit more critical wrt what your searches turn up. If you like I could DM you some helpful tips and hints so you don't do this (actually quite funny but a bit sad) mistake again.

[biervoormij]

Not sure how a man that has driven as many companies into bankruptcy as many times as he has can be considered a good choice for running a country.

 

His new company when it went public opened and spiked and has lost 77% since in a booming market.

 

If he would have taken the money he got from his Daddy and put in the S&P500 he would be worth more than he currently is. 

 

Not sure how anyone can think of him as a good businessman.

 

 

[Fat is a type of crazy]

2 hours ago, maesariang said:

He had the best US economy in 50 years.

What about when it was time to hand over the white house keys .. how were his figures then.. that's what counts ..he is such a loser he didn't admit it was time to hand over the keys.. wouldn't turn up to the inauguration.. shocker 

[candide]

1 hour ago, maesariang said:

True. Best inflation and unemployment in 50 years. Proven fact. The fact you don't know this means you don't read the facts only the left wing views.

More lies from you, Bignok. And no need to go back 50 years! 🤣

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/united-states/inflation-rate-cpi

 

It's time to change your forum neme again! 😃

[bubblegum]

biknok, suzy dolf, mae... don't care true or false. Just posts out of a ridiculous addiction to attention. 

[mdr224]

5 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

biknok, suzy dolf, mae... don't care true or false. Just posts out of a ridiculous addiction to attention. 

If he didnt every thread here would just be a liberal circlejerk

[maesariang]

36 minutes ago, biervoormij said:

Not sure how a man that has driven as many companies into bankruptcy as many times as he has can be considered a good choice for running a country.

 

His new company when it went public opened and spiked and has lost 77% since in a booming market.

 

If he would have taken the money he got from his Daddy and put in the S&P500 he would be worth more than he currently is. 

 

Not sure how anyone can think of him as a good businessman.

 

 

$400m into $4bn is pretty good. Most people would not achieve that. Most critics on here are pensioners.

[maesariang]

1 hour ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Look at the past 50 years of US market data and the markets rose more during Democrat presidents and less so during Republican. Market data don't lie.

Stock markets rise due to companies making money and the world economy. 

 

You never studied economics have you?

[bubblegum]

8 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

If he didnt every thread here would just be a liberal circlejerk

no really or do you agree that you actually don't count?

[Inderpland]

30 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Stock markets rise due to companies making money and the world economy. 

 

You never studied economics have you?

Wow, what a profound statement! You've really googled this, havn't you!

[bubblegum]

21 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Wow, what a profound statement! You've really googled this, havn't you!

She does not understand that comp. make more money when the democrates are in power.

[Inderpland]

37 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

She does not understand that comp. make more money when the democrates are in power.

She? I thought the poster maesariang was a guy. Well, another example of assumptions making etc, etc.

[bubblegum]

7 hours ago, Inderpland said:

She? I thought the poster maesariang was a guy. Well, another example of assumptions making etc, etc.

Is a guy known under many names before but the one before this was susanlea hence we call her/him/it Suzy.