9 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Surely not. You've already said it's a direct result if advertising.

 

I know you like to contradict others but, contradicting yourself is a new one and a funny one.

At least you’ve put me right, it’s the lazy.

 

The corporate world can save billions by cutting back on pointless marketing 

 

I’l let you tell them, there might be a bonus in it for you.

18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

At least you’ve put me right, it’s the lazy.

 

The corporate world can save billions by cutting back on pointless marketing 

 

I’l let you tell them, there might be a bonus in it for you.

You seem confused.

 

I said it's often laziness, not always. You, after having said it's directly because of advertising, agreed.

 

Now you seem to think it's totally down to laziness but want me to tell the marketers.

 

You best go and have a lay down. 

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

You seem confused.

 

I said it's often laziness, not always. You, after having said it's directly because of advertising, agreed.

 

Now you seem to think it's totally down to laziness but want me to tell the marketers.

 

You best go and have a lay down. 

I say there is a direct correlation between marketing of harmful products and consumption of harmful products.

You might think differently.

 

Maybe the people signing off on marketing budgets are irrational.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520952/

Edited September 14, 20241 yr by Chomper Higgot