Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, roquefort said:

Isn't that an oxymoron? If it's decided by free, independent elections it's a democracy.

Not really. Looking to Singapore eg, I would say it's a guided democracy. There are other countries which use this scheme.

Posted

Democracy - real democracy, not the pseudo b/s kind - is ALWAYS what's best for the poor and downtrodden people. It's their only way forward, if at all.

 

For the rich, running a b/s version is best - as in most of the non-Western world and partly also in some parts of the Western world (Usofa?).

 

For the middle classes it depends ...

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

You got your point. Singapore is in the hand of one family. That's fact. However, all leaders of this family got an excellent education and are predestined to rule. If you look at PISA studies, they are always among the best. Education is all. The better the education the better economy and life for the people. Different from Thailand.  And... it's not a kingdom.

Excellent post but just need to point out that the current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is not related to the Lee family. Also between 1990 to 2004, the Prime Minister was Goh Chok Tong and not related to the Lee's family. The Lee dynasty has practically ended after Lee Hsien Loong, son of Lee Kuan Yew stepped down. There are currently none in the Lee family in active politics.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Excellent post but just need to point out that the current Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is not related to the Lee family. Also between 1990 to 2004, the Prime Minister was Goh Chok Tong and not related to the Lee's family. The Lee dynasty has practically ended after Lee Hsien Loong, son of Lee Kuan Yew stepped down. There are currently none in the Lee family in active politics.

Ok, sorry, my mistake. Singapore is a good example how to develop. From a trading port to a prosperous important country. Congrats.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)

As noted above, there are degrees of democracy. In it's pure form, it is suicidal for two reasons: (1) there is a tyranny of the majority that results, and (2) the mob will votes itself free goodies from the government until the country is broke.

 

I think a working democracy would limit voting to people with a vested interest in the country, i.e., owners of property of different types who are net taxpayers. The voting age should also be no less than 25 and maybe even higher than that. It should also be indirect in the sense of voting for people to represent designated zones with age limits, term limits and strict auditing of finances with anybody found to be gaining inappropriately from office to face severe criminal consequences.

 

Whatever the case, no system of "democracy" should ever allow the likes of a Joe Biden or Kamala Harris to rise in it under any circumstances.

 

 

 

Edited by stats
trolling meme removed
Posted

Democracy works best when all, or at least most, of the citizens allowed to vote are well-informed about the issues they are being asked to vote on. That's not the case in my home country, the USA, and I don't think it's the case in Thailand either. The next best type of government, IMO, is a republic, where you elect representatives to vote on the issues. That's what we have in the USA, and even this is not working well. There is too much misinformation being circulated now.

Posted
23 hours ago, Srikcir said:

False.

  • Indoneasia is a representative democratic republic wherein the President is both Head of State and government and sustained through legislation by the electorate through free and fair election of their multi-party representatives. 
  • Singapore has a democratic parliamentary democratic system thriugh free and open election similar to Germany wherein the President io that shows they fair substantially better than their Southeast an undemocratic counterparts.

You're talking about 2 countries that are barely out  of the strongman era.

Lee Kwan Yew ruled Singapore with an iron fist for 30 years and his family still has major sway there.  The Sukharno and Suharto eras in Indonesia were similar and still very visible in the rear view mirror.  While there are good signs for the future (as opposed to our little backwater), its too early to say which direction events will take them.  Verdict is still out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...