Facebook minimum age?

[Confuscious]

I was thinking that Facebook had a minimum age to be allowed to post.
Apparently not.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/696675895069666

[scubascuba3]

No, how can they police that anyway, you sign up with ID?

[KhunBENQ]

Had to look it up.

13 is the official limit.

How they check it?

Don't ask me.

 

Fits well with some news I picked up today.

For Instagram (also 13) they will introduce "teen accounts"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c77x44zplkyo

 

Some countries have their own laws with higher age limits.

Enforcement? Again don't ask me.

[Confuscious]

Allowing children of 10 years old to post in faceSh@t for friendship (and more) while arresting someone who has the pictures of these children on their hard disk?

Create a heaven for pedophiles?

I thought I did see it all, but apparently NOT.

[Confuscious]

12 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

Had to look it up.

13 is the official limit.

How they check it?

Don't ask me.

 

Fits well with some news I picked up today.

For Instagram (also 13) they will introduce "teen accounts"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c77x44zplkyo

 

Some countries have their own laws with higher age limits.

Enforcement? Again don't ask me.

FaceSh*t and instapedo should be sued for allowing this.

[Confuscious]

10 year old children should be doing their homework instead posting their pictures in FaceSh*t.

[Confuscious]

56 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

No, how can they police that anyway, you sign up with ID?

Maybe an old auntie created the account to sell "defloration of a kid"?

[johng]

57 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

you sign up with ID?

 

Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech.

[johng]

57 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

you sign up with ID?

 

Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech.

[scubascuba3]

32 minutes ago, johng said:

 

Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech.

so you signed up with Facebook with digital ID? I didn't 

[scubascuba3]

44 minutes ago, Confuscious said:

10 year old children should be doing their homework instead posting their pictures in FaceSh*t.

Could be children on AN too, some posters seem like that

[johng]

12 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

so you signed up with Facebook

 

No didn't sign up.

[KhunBENQ]

13 hours ago, johng said:

 

Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech.

The wet dream of the intelligence agencies and totalitarian regimes.

Face and fingerprint scanner to connect to the internet, register at social media, forums etc .

That would indeed be the end of internet as we know it.

[KhunBENQ]

12 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

so you signed up with Facebook with digital ID? I didn't 

Not yet implemented fortunately.

Against all rules from FB I have an account there with complete random/nonsense data.

I use it for gathering information mainly.

No "socializing".

[Ralf001]

14 hours ago, Confuscious said:

.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/696675895069666

 

 

Struth 😍😍😍

[OneMoreFarang]

14 hours ago, Confuscious said:

Allowing children of 10 years old to post in faceSh@t for friendship (and more) while arresting someone who has the pictures of these children on their hard disk?

Create a heaven for pedophiles?

I thought I did see it all, but apparently NOT.

 

So, what would all those bad guys do? Maybe look at pictures from advertisement?

 

For clarification: I searched for "10 year old children in advertising" and that is what came up, together with many other pictures. If some sick guys get horny looking at those pictures, then I can't help it.

My point is, children and pictures of children are everywhere - not just online. 

 

 

 

 

[scubascuba3]

14 hours ago, johng said:

 

Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech.

 

1 hour ago, johng said:

 

No didn't sign up.

ah you said you signed up to facebook using digital ID, so misleading post it seems

[johng]

5 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

 

ah you said you signed up to facebook using digital ID, so misleading post it seems

I did not say I signed up to Facebook at all !!!!

 

you have quoted what I wrote in full   go back and read it again.

[scubascuba3]

8 minutes ago, johng said:

I did not say I signed up to Facebook at all !!!!

 

you have quoted what I wrote in full   go back and read it again.

The thread is about Facebook, re-read the title

[johng]

2 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

The thread is about Facebook, re-read the title

 

What on earth are you talking about ?

I told you quite clearly that I have not signed up for Facebook  neither with a digital ID or any another ID   no Facebook for me  get it ??

 

I commented  in relation to Facebook,online and life in general.

 

"Yes digital ID   they are pushing very hard for this now  and if successful will be the end of internet anonymity and thereafter free speech."

 

notice in the quote above did I say sighed up to Facebook  ?

no  it was you who inferred it.

 

you then accuse me of  a misleading post !!

26 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

ah you said you signed up to facebook using digital ID, so misleading post it seems

 

[Confuscious]

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

So, what would all those bad guys do? Maybe look at pictures from advertisement?

 

For clarification: I searched for "10 year old children in advertising" and that is what came up, together with many other pictures. If some sick guys get horny looking at those pictures, then I can't help it.

My point is, children and pictures of children are everywhere - not just online. 

 

 

 

 

The point is: would you condone it?

Looks like social media is becoming the new "dark web".

A heaven for pedophiles and sickos.

The link I posted says "children from 10 to 15 years looking for boy/girlfriend".

But if you look, there are sickos from mich older age looking for a "boy/girlfriend".

Also, the point is that a few weeks ago a guy was arrested because the cops found some pictures of children on his harddisk.

If you have browsed the link, your hard disk will be full with pictures of kiddies.

This is so wrong.

[Nick Carter icp]

22 hours ago, Confuscious said:

10 year old children should be doing their homework instead posting their pictures in FaceSh*t.

 

  Doing homework for 6 hours a day ?

[Confuscious]

8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Doing homework for 6 hours a day ?

Instead of hanging on FaceSh*t at that age they could better do some exercise.

Would you like to be the father of a child of that age that meets a boy-girlfriend who turns out to be an old pedo?

[Confuscious]

 

[Nick Carter icp]

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

So, what would all those bad guys do? Maybe look at pictures from advertisement?

 

For clarification: I searched for "10 year old children in advertising" and that is what came up, together with many other pictures. If some sick guys get horny looking at those pictures, then I can't help it.

My point is, children and pictures of children are everywhere - not just online. 

 

 

 

 

 

   That is strange , when I just did  webseach for *10 year olds in advertising" , that photo didn't show up

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=10+year+old+children+in+advertising&sca_esv=551e60b6ece79812&sca_upv=1&tbm=isch&sxsrf=ADLYWIL7PopGwm7VNRjQ94ChzKw_OxqdFQ:1726829561309&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjindu0rdGIAxXw1TgGHTtrHSYQ_AUoAXoECAYQAw&biw=1255&bih=539&dpr=1.53

 

  And when I did a reverse image search , this result came up 

 

No results for selected photo

 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

16 minutes ago, Confuscious said:

The point is: would you condone it?

Looks like social media is becoming the new "dark web".

A heaven for pedophiles and sickos.

The link I posted says "children from 10 to 15 years looking for boy/girlfriend".

But if you look, there are sickos from mich older age looking for a "boy/girlfriend".

Also, the point is that a few weeks ago a guy was arrested because the cops found some pictures of children on his harddisk.

If you have browsed the link, your hard disk will be full with pictures of kiddies.

This is so wrong.

 

Who puts all these pictures on social media? The users!

As far as I know lots of parents post thousands of pictures of their children growing up. Nobody forces them to do that. They want to do it.

 

Is it a problem? Personally I don't really think so. Because anybody can see children anywhere in this world including on beaches, swimming pools, schools, etc. And for most people they just see children and they don't see sex objects.

 

Obviously I am aware that some sick people get horny when they see children or pictures of children. It is sad that that happens. But what is the solution? No pictures of children anymore? No children on beaches and swimming pools anymore? Maybe no children in public at all anywhere? That makes no sense at all.

 

IMHO most perverts will find what they want. It doesn't really matter if there are 10 thousand pictures out there or 10 million pictures. They will find some of them.

 

Arrest the real bad guys but accept that society as a whole should not be suppressed to a sad level because there are some bad people out there.

[Nick Carter icp]

6 minutes ago, Confuscious said:

Instead of hanging on FaceSh*t at that age they could better do some exercise.

Would you like to be the father of a child of that age that meets a boy-girlfriend who turns out to be an old pedo?

 

   Rally, just call it facebook, you look like in idiot keep calling it "FaceSh*t".

   After leaving for school at 7 AM and getting home at 4 PM , ten years olds don't want to do excess  homework or go out exercising , that just want to sit and relax on their computers .

   Ten year olds don't go out on their own to meet strangers

[Nick Carter icp]

9 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Where did you  get that photo from ?

That is soft core child porn .

[OneMoreFarang]

5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   That is strange , when I just did  webseach for *10 year olds in advertising" , that photo didn't show up

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=10+year+old+children+in+advertising&sca_esv=551e60b6ece79812&sca_upv=1&tbm=isch&sxsrf=ADLYWIL7PopGwm7VNRjQ94ChzKw_OxqdFQ:1726829561309&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjindu0rdGIAxXw1TgGHTtrHSYQ_AUoAXoECAYQAw&biw=1255&bih=539&dpr=1.53

 

  And when I did a reverse image search , this result came up 

 

No results for selected photo

 

I have no idea how repeatable these searches are. This is what I see right now.

Not the same pictures but plenty of pictures of children including half naked babies.

This in Thailand, no VPN or any other special setting.

 

 

 

[OneMoreFarang]

Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Where did you  get that photo from ?

That is soft core child porn .

Google, today, just a moment before I posted it.

I posted the link from the picture in Google search. I did not insert a picture. 

I am sure the AseanNow admins can find the link which I posted if they really want to know.

My whole point was and is: Pictures of children are everywhere, not only on social media.