Jump to content









British National Killed in Sattahip Motorcycle Accident


Georgealbert

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, soi3eddie said:

 

No place for a big bike in Thailand. Too fast for the road conditions and adherance to the road rules by others. My last big bike was an FZR1000 in 1988. Would still do 160mph (257kph) even for an old bike then. I'm happy these days with my ADV150 at 118kph maximum. The freedom feeling on a bike is incredible, but sadly he found perpetual freedom. RIP the big biker.    

 

Me same same you, but 1989 EXUP 1000 and now an Aerox! 👌🏻😇

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


13 hours ago, brianburi said:

No, it's not.   This is not a big bike country,  no need for them at all.  Far too dangerous.......

 

Thailand considers anything over 400cc to be a "big bike".

 

400cc bike is dangerous you say... what about a 400cc scooter ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First day back in Thailand, “ I allways go slow & steady first day back on my bike to get the feel of riding again , don’t own a bike in aus, only here in Chiang Mai , a RE meteor 350 cc is plenty powerful enough for me , allways helmet, no nite riding or when drinking, 67 years & enjoying the ride. 
cheers SS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No heavy rain in the photo. There was a sign at the median between the flyover and the underpass. He rode right into the sign (the cuts and fractured skull) and the bike disintegrated when the front wheel made contact with the median.  There could be a dozen reasons why he hit the median. Hell, it could have been target fixation or being distracted for a fraction of a second at the wrong moment.  I ride there and turn around back to Pattaya at that spot a couple of times per week. People who are making a Uturn don't enter the area at a high rate of speed. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2024 at 7:01 PM, Ralf001 said:

Two friends of the gent have posted.. seems he was a very expericed rider.

 

might be best to read the thread before making yourself look the complete arse.

Ok..the sign eas at fault 

he saw two large motorcycles coming down the road. While the first rider successfully made the U-turn towards Pattaya, the second rider collided head-on with the traffic sign, causing his body to be thrown from the bike. Emergency services were alerted, but the victim had already succumbed to his injuries.

 

Authorities have documented the scene and will question witnesses further to determine the exact cause of the crash. The body has been transferred to the Police General Hospital in Bangkok for an autopsy to confirm the cause of death, as part of the ongoing investigation.

 

Picture from responders.
 

IMG_6461.jpeg
 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2024-10-06

 

news-footer-2.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 11
Like
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lordgrinz said:

 

By the damage and dead body, he did.

 

No, silly. It looks as if he manoeuvred to take the flyover a bit too late. As someone mentioned before, he was on a ride with someone else. They may have taken the flyover and he realised a bit too late. A split second decision and hit the divider between the road and flyover. Nothing to do with a U-turn. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

No, silly. It looks as if he manoeuvred to take the flyover a bit too late. As someone mentioned before, he was on a ride with someone else. They may have taken the flyover and he realised a bit too late. A split second decision and hit the divider between the road and flyover. Nothing to do with a U-turn. 

 

Look at the damage again, and the dead body, he was speeding....PERIOD! If it was because he made the attempt too late, that's his fault, but nobody takes an exit at any speed that would cause that much damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, lordgrinz said:

 

Look at the damage again, and the dead body, he was speeding....PERIOD! If it was because he made the attempt too late, that's his fault, but nobody takes an exit at any speed that would cause that much damage.

 

So what's your point? You want to gloat over it? No one has suggested he was moving at 40km/h. 

The discussion was about a U-Turn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

So what's your point? You want to gloat over it? No one has suggested he was moving at 40km/h. 

The discussion was about a U-Turn.

 

I believe they are saying it's an exit for a U-Turn under the overpass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...