.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
12
What Books Are You Reading ? (2025)
Just read Opus by Gareth Gore, about a Catholic sect called Opus Dei, and their criminal activities. Character Limit by Conger and Mac. It details the story of how Elon Musk destroyed Twitter. Currently reading Rinsed by Geoff White, about money laundering in the world of crypto technology. -
0
THAILAND LIVE Thailand Live Friday 3 January 2025
Photo courtesy of PoliceTV Facebook Skydiving stunt lands 3 Americans in hot water at Bangkok mall - video By Puntid Tantivangphaisal A brazen late-night stunt by three American daredevils has left Bangkok police fuming after a viral video showed them parachuting off the roof of the Emsphere shopping mall. The outrageous clip, posted on TikTok by user @armankremer with hashtags like #basejump and #urbex, ignited a storm of online criticism and has prompted the mall to press trespassing charges. Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1347749-skydiving-stunt-lands-3-americans-in-hot-water-at-bangkok-mall-video/ -
99
BREAKING NEWS New Orleans: Multiple people dead on Bourbon Street as 'car ploughs through crowd'
I'll flip the two final sentences back at you: this is clearly NOT genocide by any definition of the word. To argue otherwise means you don't understand what genocide actually involves. I wrote a lengthy reply on this issue in another thread (https://aseannow.com/topic/1345458-amnesty-international-its-a-genocide-in-gaza/page/6/#findComment-19464174), complete with sources and links. Short answer is it can't be genocide because: 1) the population of Gaza increased in 2023 and 2024, despite all the deaths from military action; 2) the number of deaths in the 15 months of the conflict represents 1% to 2% of the pre-conflict population of Gaza. The exact percentage depends on what figures are used for the population of Gaza and whether the death toll includes combatants as well as non-combatants. That percentage is far below the death toll in any other conflict accurately termed a genocide; and 3) Israel has no intent to eliminate the Palestinian people but only to defend Israelis against terrorist attacks. The number of casualties is inflated by Hamas combatants hiding among civilians and using civilian facilities such as schools, hospitals, aprtment buildings, etc. for military purposes. Through the years, Israel fought in several "conventional" wars, such as the Suez Crisis (October 1956); Six-Day War (June 1967); War of Attrition (1967–1970); and Yom Kippur War (October 1973). During these conflicts, the IDF inflicted very few casualties on civilians, Palestinians or othwerwise. Because the current conflict takes place in a densely populated urban environment, it's much more dificult for IDF to avoid civilian casualties. -
40
Trump Reiterates Warning to Hamas on Hostage Release
You should know by now that claiming jailed prisoners in Israel are hostages is against forum rules -
44
Juristic want's to ban weed possession in the building - are there other weed free condos?
Sounds like your juristic person has been resurrected from ancient DNA. Roll a fatty, call Jeff Goldblum. -
65
Russia Dismisses Proposed Peace Deal from Trump Transition Team
The US did not invade Cuba. The US let the Cubans struggle under Russian rule, it allowed Russia to deploy conventional weapons on the island for defensive purposes, it allowed communism to rule the place unchecked, it kept sanctions in place and focused on something better, more rewarding and interesting than wasting time with the Castro brothers and their demented, hopeless circus. Problem solved. Can Putin do the same? He could but he miscalculated, and now his past criminal behavior doesn't allow him to acknowledge defeat, relax, retire or let his guard down. He must always seem to come out on top, to project strength to feel secure. In the very moment Putin acknowledges defeat in Ukraine, he would instantly turn into a dead man walking in the Kremlin. To be clear, Putin has already lost. He triggered a war to prevent Ukraine to become NATO member and, even before the war is lost, both Finland and Sweden already joined the alliance. Finland and Sweden added 1,350 km to the border shared by NATO with Russia, a combined population which is half of that of Ukraine, but with a combined GDP of $895 billion, five times bigger than Ukraine. In a democratic open society, genuinely worried about a hypothetical NATO aggressive stance, Putin would have been impeached and forced to retire. Neville Chamberlain is a good example of what happens in democracy when a leader is defeated in the international arena by a dangerous opponent. But Russia is not a democratic open society, and in Russia politics is just about posturing and eliminating one's opponents. In Russia all smart people perfectly know that NATO hypothetical aggressivity is a joke. NATO has no reason to invade Russia and take charge of 140 million Russian citizens, a big junk of whom are destitute, illiterate, alcoholics, troublemakers and/or pretty w**res. Only idiots in Russia (and elsewhere) can truly believe that NATO may have aggressive intentions. Therefore, Putin is left off the hook. He can keep on posturing, pretending to be a world master strategist, while the Russians pretend to believe that NATO is a dangerous enemy, their casualty count mounts, innocent Ukrainians are killed every day, the Russian economy is slowly but securely sliding into a crisis similar to the one that caused the demise of the Soviet Union, and the Russians, as usual, are the ones who will foot the dearest bill, Bottom line Russia is just an immense Potemkin village. Another demented, hopeless circus, like the one the Castro brothers set up in Cuba, only much bigger and wealthier. -
40
Trump Reiterates Warning to Hamas on Hostage Release
wait and see the magic Donny weaves, remember unless cheated, Donny always wins.... -
6
So masks do work after all -- a comprehensive scientific review
No, if certain masks are worn correctly and consistently they may be effective in reducing transmission. Even that is a stretch of logic from my analysis of the paper and its sources. I was going to do a critique of the paper and its sources, but it would amount to many pages and nobody would read it, therefore it would be a complete waste of my time. Mask-wearing is akin to wearing an amulet, you either believe in its efficacy or not. There was never any evidence for their efficacy and this paper sets out with the hypothesis that mask-wearing was effective, using some very poor observational studies as part of the meta-analysis. as someone who has been involved in research, Cochrane Reviews are very useful as an overview of the evidence, though such reviews are really as reliable as retrospective population studies, unless the source material is sound. Give me a Cochrane Study with 10 RCTs and I'll take that over 1000 observational studies. Probably the weakest form of evidence is anecdotal evidence, however when you consider mask mandates did nothing to prevent entire populations being infected, and from my own observational studies in a hospital environment, didn't stop medical staff or patients being infected, then you really need to question whether real-world scenarios fit in with cherry-picked studies. as an aside, a major confounder is that many people just did not become infected. I personally know of an Anaesthetist who asked his so-called positive daughter to cough into his face a number of times a day over a period of a week. All hospital workers had to do a daily test before starting work, and he was never positive. Had he worn an N95 24/7, not even removing it to eat, one could conclude that the mask prevented infection, but he didn't, and he wasn't infected as far as testing was concerned. The bottom line here is for any study that claims masks have any efficacy, there has to be a control group within the population that is measured, against the other population. Like I said, it's more of a belief than an actual non-pharmaceutical intervention, and seriously, you have to question the psyche of anyone who habitually wears a mask, post all the scaremongering, because they are scared of getting an infection with a kill rate so low that the numbers are meaningless, especially for young, healthy people.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now