Just now, dinsdale said:

Saw that. Thought your post was harmless banter.

Me too. 2 blokes who have a bet - if Harris wins I have to change avatar to the one given, and vica versa.

On 10/17/2024 at 6:59 AM, NickyLouie said:

She bombed in that interview.

 

It showed how incompetent she is.

 

#BuhByeKamala 

 

 

 

She turned up 20 minutes late, knowing there was a tight time schedule to get the interview 'on air'

Then in the interview it was a total train wreck!

It was a total disaster, she couldn't answer a question, just deflecting the answer to Trump.

 

 

3 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Seems like you might’ve been watching a different interview, or you’ve got selective hearing. Let’s get real:

1. 'No policy'? Wrong. Harris discussed immigration (border security, root causes), healthcare (expanding access), and gun control (background checks, assault weapon bans). You missed that, huh?
    

2. 'Mentioned Trump 20 times'? Nice round number, but it’s exaggerated. She mentioned him when relevant, drawing contrasts—standard stuff. Got a timestamp for that 20-count?
    

3. 'Dodged Biden’s mental state question with "Trump"’? Total fiction. She defended Biden’s record. If she deflected, prove it—timestamp or it didn’t happen.
    

4. 'Turn the page, Trump...' Another twist. If she referenced Trump, it’s for context. Not deflection. Standard practice, but I guess that’s lost on you.
    

5. 'B-b-but Trump' caricature? Convenient. She gave specifics on policies you ignored. Easier than engaging, I suppose.
    

6. 'Immigration question, evasive'? Immigration isn’t simple. She explained it in detail. Just because it wasn’t a soundbite doesn’t make it evasive.
    

You’re either misrepresenting or making things up. Try watching again—maybe without the bias filter this time.
 

 

Points 1-6 all rubbish. She didn't answer any of the (quite simple) questions directly. She's hopeless. 

4 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Me too. 2 blokes who have a bet - if Harris wins I have to change avatar to the one given, and vica versa.

Actually my thinking was that all Kamala fans should all change their avatar after Nov 5 and they have one of two choices. 

In all these debates and interviews, who has been the most sober, knowledgeable, detailed, even toned, and interested in the issues facing America. Just one answer: Bret Baier. Bret Baier should be president.

3 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Seems like you might’ve been watching a different interview, or you’ve got selective hearing. Let’s get real:

1. 'No policy'? Wrong. Harris discussed immigration (border security, root causes), healthcare (expanding access), and gun control (background checks, assault weapon bans). You missed that, huh?
    

2. 'Mentioned Trump 20 times'? Nice round number, but it’s exaggerated. She mentioned him when relevant, drawing contrasts—standard stuff. Got a timestamp for that 20-count?
    

3. 'Dodged Biden’s mental state question with "Trump"’? Total fiction. She defended Biden’s record. If she deflected, prove it—timestamp or it didn’t happen.
    

4. 'Turn the page, Trump...' Another twist. If she referenced Trump, it’s for context. Not deflection. Standard practice, but I guess that’s lost on you.
    

5. 'B-b-but Trump' caricature? Convenient. She gave specifics on policies you ignored. Easier than engaging, I suppose.
    

6. 'Immigration question, evasive'? Immigration isn’t simple. She explained it in detail. Just because it wasn’t a soundbite doesn’t make it evasive.
    

You’re either misrepresenting or making things up. Try watching again—maybe without the bias filter this time.
 

This is complete and utter rubbish. If you disagree you can go to the YT video of the interview, open the transcript and copy and paste the answers. I will be interested to see her answers. By the way your point 3 proves the point of a non answer. A deflection. A politicians answer. She was asked about when she first became aware of Biden's cognitive decline, NOT about his record. Point six she was specifically asked to supply a number. Please copy and paste the number she gave from the transcript. Good luck.

33 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

New post Nov 5 avatar for all the Kamala fans. Two choices.

 

Or there's the new end of presidential race for Harris limited edition ball cap:

 

15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Actually my thinking was that all Kamala fans should all change their avatar after Nov 5 and they have one of two choices. 

Love it - but would any of them put their belief to the test??

 

 

16 minutes ago, John Drake said:

In all these debates and interviews, who has been the most sober, knowledgeable, detailed, even toned, and interested in the issues facing America. Just one answer: Bret Baier. Bret Baier should be president.

Or - how about Bill Maher? Or Elon Musk? 

5 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Love it - but would any of them put their belief to the test??

 

 

Doubt it. 

Just now, dinsdale said:

Doubt it. 

Girlfriend.....?    😘

1 minute ago, transam said:

Girlfriend.....?    😘

Very witty once again. Well at least 50% witty.

41 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

 Crashing the Oil and Gas industries in the name of 'climate change' and causing huge industry cost increases and therefore prices to rise dramatically???   What were they thunking - and I do mean thunking.    

If anything shows how massively out of touch you are with reality, it's the comment of yours I've quoted above. Here is same genuine information about the oil and gas industry. Both oil and gas production rose to record levels.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61545#:~:text=Crude oil production in the,than 13.3 million b%2Fd.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/265331/natural-gas-production-in-the-us/

 

 

 

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Girlfriend.....?    😘

 

 

Close.....boyfriend.

1 minute ago, placeholder said:

If anything shows how massively out of touch you are with reality, it's the comment of yours I've quoted above. Here is same genuine information about the oil and gas industry. Both oil and gas production rose to record levels.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61545#:~:text=Crude oil production in the,than 13.3 million b%2Fd.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/265331/natural-gas-production-in-the-us/

 

 

 

Watch the US bar go up after Nov 5.

 

What do you think the effect of this theory would be? Genius or catastrophe? 

7 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Think what you will about Bill O'Reilly but this this is pretty good and bi-partisan. I think his closing statement would be the opinion come to by many Kamalacurious folks that watched this interview.

 

 

 

Best summing up of her outrageously arrogant performance, at least Biden has an excuse for not answering questions. What was the point of going on a platform of basically Trump supporters to blame Trump for everything, even for the time she has been in office? Disgraceful and dishonest performance.  

1 minute ago, theblether said:

What do you think the effect of this theory would be? Genius or catastrophe? 

They'd have a better chance if they brought Biden back and dumped the dummy. As it is neither are in charge and neither have a clue what their doing.

58 minutes ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

He is more of a 'balanced' Democrat these days. Since Obama he has very much become more willing to criticise the Dems because their policy and direction is very different. But before that he would 'die on a hill' for the Dems - times have certainly changed.  IMO he is like Bill Maher and Elon Musk - and so many other 'moderate' liberals. They see that the Dems have gone far too far left - they have been 'taken over' but that radical feminist, and academic, and disgruntled minorities, which was previously their 'core' but was not their main focus - they were more their 'useful idiots' - now they run the Party and introduce their policies.    

Sure. Fox chose them because they were balanced Democrats. It is to laugh. Why not choose Democrats who are tough on Trump? Or, for that matter, Republicans who are tough on Trump? I guess their target market is people who believe that the oil and gas industry in the USA have been crashing because of Joe Biden. You know anybody like that?

13 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Doubt it. 

Me too

42 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

 

She turned up 20 minutes late, knowing there was a tight time schedule to get the interview 'on air'

Then in the interview it was a total train wreck!

It was a total disaster, she couldn't answer a question, just deflecting the answer to Trump.

 

 

 Trump is chronically late for interviews, press conferences and his own rallies. She masterfully adapted Trump’s penchant for lateness. 
 

She handled the interview well in spite of consistent interruptions and attempts to talk over her. Brilliant that she point out Trump’s deficiencies to the Fox audiences. 

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

They'd have a better chance if they brought Biden back and dumped the dummy. As it is neither are in charge and neither have a clue what their doing.

 

Jill Biden will be sharpening her claws no matter what occurs. 

8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Watch the US bar go up after Nov 5.

 

Thanks for demonstrating how little you understand the oil and gas industry. It's a worldwide industry and worldwide market. The oil and gas industry in the USA  aren't trying to set records for the sake of setting records. It's about profits. If they can make more money by pumping more oil they will. More likely they'll be pumping less since huge oil and gas projects outside the USA are coming online. And the Saudis have been holding back. And their production costs are far lower than most production costs elsewhere, including in the USA. But starting in December they've said they're going to be pumping more.

 

 

52 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Accelerated deconstruction. Only Harris fans know the secret.

Devolving into Homo Hysteriacus 

2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 Trump is chronically late for interviews, press conferences and his own rallies. She masterfully adapted Trump’s penchant for lateness. 
 

She handled the interview well in spite of consistent interruptions and attempts to talk over her. Brilliant that she point out Trump’s deficiencies to the Fox audiences. 

 

Keep your eye on Politico this weekend. 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 Trump is chronically late for interviews, press conferences and his own rallies. She masterfully adapted Trump’s penchant for lateness. 

She handled the interview well in spite of consistent interruptions and attempts to talk over her. Brilliant that she point out Trump’s deficiencies to the Fox audiences. 

It is OK to be a Dems supporter, but stating that Harris did anything 'masterfully' or 'brilliant' is to deny reality.

I find it hard to accept that Biden got 15 million more legitimate votes in 2020 (81 million) than Obama got in 2012 (66 million) - but that is the 'reality'.

But I find it unbelievable that anyone would think that Harris did well - she bombed mate - badly.

The election, save for some unbelievable disaster, is as good as over.

Edited October 18, 20241 yr by TroubleandGrumpy

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Thanks for demonstrating how little you understand the oil and gas industry. It's a worldwide industry and worldwide market. The oil and gas industry in the USA  aren't trying to set records for the sake of setting records. It's about profits. If they can make more money by pumping more oil they will. More likely they'll be pumping less since huge oil and gas projects outside the USA are coming online. And the Saudis have been holding back. And their production costs are far lower than most production costs elsewhere, including in the USA. But starting in December they've said they're going to be pumping more.

 

 

Alaska. 

 

10 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 Trump is chronically late for interviews, press conferences and his own rallies. She masterfully adapted Trump’s penchant for lateness. 
 

She handled the interview well in spite of consistent interruptions and attempts to talk over her. Brilliant that she point out Trump’s deficiencies to the Fox audiences. 

So, did you actuallly read the transcript I provided?   And check whether or not your six assertions were valid or merely the fevered dreams of a member of Team Harris.

5 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

Keep your eye on Politico this weekend. 

 

 

 

20 Harris staffers speak to Politico. This is the Pennsylvania team. Politico are apparently readying "what really happened" at Fox. 

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/16/kamala-harris-pennsylvania-campaign-drama-00183844

 

 

26 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Very witty once again. Well at least 50% witty.

When it comes to being witty, they tend to show it with regards to sex (as in 'girlfriend?').

Two word summary is of course ........... begins with phu