Jump to content

Clashes and Arrests as Tommy Robinson Supporters March Through London


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I absolutely support a full and thorough police investigation, up to and including prosecution and if found guilty imprisonment to the fullest extent of the relevant law.

 

Why do you think he hasn't been arrested when there is widely circulated CCTV footage of him punching a man to the ground and then hitting him several times as he is lying on the floor?

 

Compared to say, someone who posted something stupid on FaceBook and was detained without bail and then jailed for several years?

 

Can MP's beat up members of the public in Britain now?

 

It's selective enforcement of the law. Again...

 

2 Tier Britain exposed for everyone to see. 

 

Now, let's hear your gaslighting...

Posted
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Why do you think he hasn't been arrested when there is widely circulated CCTV footage of him punching a man to the ground and then hitting him several times as he is lying on the floor?

 

Compared to say, someone who posted something stupid on FaceBook and was detained without bail and then jailed for several years?

 

Can MP's beat up members of the public in Britain now?

 

It's selective enforcement of the law. Again...

 

2 Tier Britain exposed for everyone to see. 

 

Now, let's hear your gaslighting...

I’ve no idea.

 

Neither do you.

 

But I see you are back to misrepresenting the online criminal behavior that you have on multiple occasions been corrected on.

 

What people ‘can do’ is not what the law says people ‘may do’, and as I have unequivocally stated above, I support due process in the admission of the law.

 

It’s not difficult to do Jonny, you just have to go easy on your seething self stoke grievance.

 

After-all, we neither of us know why the attacker has not been arrested, only one of us is eager to jump to conclusions, it’s a habit of yours.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I would be surprised if you did, my views are supportive of due process in the administration of law and order.

 

Having failed in your attempt to invent views on my behalf you are of course left with nothing but the lessons of life you learn playing ‘Grand Theft Auto’.

 

"supportive of due process in the administration of law and order" is not a view on what happened, its a deferral to a system that has so far failed to charge those muslim thugs who smashed a female police officers nose yet sentenced a women to 31 months imprisonment for a facebook post.  A "view" of what happened would be to state whether or not his feral behaviour was acceptable as an MP who has the prefix "the right honourable" in front of his name.

 

As I mentioned I don't expect you to be able to provide such a view as it falls outside of your capabilities here.   

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

After-all, we neither of us know why the attacker has not been arrested, only one of us is eager to jump to conclusions, it’s a habit of yours

 

I know exactly why he hasn't been arrested.

 

But your gaslighting is no surprise. It's all you have at this point.  

Posted
35 minutes ago, James105 said:

 

"supportive of due process in the administration of law and order" is not a view on what happened, its a deferral to a system that has so far failed to charge those muslim thugs who smashed a female police officers nose yet sentenced a women to 31 months imprisonment for a facebook post.  A "view" of what happened would be to state whether or not his feral behaviour was acceptable as an MP who has the prefix "the right honourable" in front of his name.

 

As I mentioned I don't expect you to be able to provide such a view as it falls outside of your capabilities here.   

I’ve already given my view of the video shows happening, here it is once again.

 

Please let me know what particular part(s) of this statement bothers you and why:

 

19 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I absolutely support a full and thorough police investigation, up to and including prosecution and if found guilty imprisonment to the fullest extent of the relevant law.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I know exactly why he hasn't been arrested.

 

But your gaslighting is no surprise. It's all you have at this point.  

Jonny, assume you know.

 

Your assertion that you do know when you obviously do not is exactly the ‘gaslighting’ you bang on about.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 10/28/2024 at 12:17 PM, roo860 said:

Looking like she's got the onset of Parkinsons.

 

Much as I dislike Abbott and her vile beliefs/comments, I certainly wouldn't wish that on anyone. 

 

Given her history with alcohol (illegally chugging back rum on public transport etc.) it could just as easily be the 5 o'clock tremors which is known to lead to this type of erratic hand and finger movement. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Plenty of evidence.

 

Edwards - suspended sentence for child porn

Manchester thugs - no charges for breaking policewomans nose

Labour MP - no arrest for assault

 

Robinson - 18 months for contempt of court.

Various anti immigration Facebook posters - no bail, then 2 months to 3 years fast-tracked through the courts for hurty words on social media.

 

I could go on and on. 

 

You keep pretending it isn't happening though. 

 

Plenty of whataboutary and auto grievance stroking.

 

I wonder, has the guy who was assaulted filed a police complaint and stated he wishes to press charges?

 

 

 

33 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I could go on and on. 

 

 Have no doubt you will.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Plenty of whataboutary and auto grievance stroking.

 

It's not whataboutery Chomps, it's recent examples of 2 tier justice. It is examples of inconsistency. To which you have absolutely no justification so you attempt to deflect with your favourite copy/paste phrases. 

 

 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

I wonder, has the guy who was assaulted filed a police complaint and stated he wishes to press charges?

 

And now right on cue we have the aforementioned deflection.

 

The assault was captured on CCTV and has been widely spread on social media. He has admitted it was him and Labour have suspended him. What more do the police need? If I shoot someone in the head and kill them on live TV, I guess I won't be charged since the victim can't press charges? A ludicrous attempt to justify him not being charged.😆

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Why do you think he hasn't been arrested when there is widely circulated CCTV footage of him punching a man to the ground and then hitting him several times as he is lying on the floor?

 

Compared to say, someone who posted something stupid on FaceBook and was detained without bail and then jailed for several years?

 

Can MP's beat up members of the public in Britain now?

 

It's selective enforcement of the law. Again...

 

2 Tier Britain exposed for everyone to see. 

 

Now, let's hear your gaslighting...

like the Muslim thug that broke a female Police officers nose this will be pushed under the carpet and if anyone questions it and this thugs arrest they will be getting a knock at the door for spreading rumor's.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

like the Muslim thug that broke a female Police officers nose this will be pushed under the carpet and if anyone questions it and this thugs arrest they will be getting a knock at the door for spreading rumor's.

 

How is it or how will it be pushed under the carpet and by whom?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

How is it or how will it be pushed under the carpet and by whom?

 

By the CPS doing their best to avoid pressing charges.

 

Hopefully Reform's threat of a private prosecution will force their hand.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

It's not whataboutery Chomps, it's recent examples of 2 tier justice. It is examples of inconsistency. To which you have absolutely no justification so you attempt to deflect with your favourite copy/paste phrases. 

 

 

 

And now right on cue we have the aforementioned deflection.

 

The assault was captured on CCTV and has been widely spread on social media. He has admitted it was him and Labour have suspended him. What more do the police need? If I shoot someone in the head and kill them on live TV, I guess I won't be charged since the victim can't press charges? A ludicrous attempt to justify him not being charged.😆

 

 


Your whataboutary isn’t whataboutary because it’s recent?


“What more do the police need?”

 

My guess is a formal police complaint from the victim.


I believe I’m correct t in saying, victims of assault have the right to press or not press charges.  

 

 

But why are you asking me, it is you that claims to know why the assailant hasn’t been arrested, but then you have proved no evidence as to why and now you are asking stranger on the internet why.
 

 If I shoot someone in the head and kill them on live TV, I guess I won't be charged since the victim can't press charges? A ludicrous attempt to justify him not being charged.“

 

A ludicrous false equivalence.
 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

As a  UK resident living here let me put some points for you to ponder on. Thanks to New Gear kier we have now had the most rubber boats crossing the Channel so far than all last years crossings. He promised to stop them instead we have record numbers, over 20,000 so far this year. We are seen now as the minority in our own Country. Areas of the North are now controlled by Muslims demanding Sharia law, Christian values are banned, child grooming gangs and assaults by Muslims are withheld from major news channels because the government bends over backwards to the Muslim community's fearing a backlash. When we protest about this we are called  far right wing thugs hell bent on causing trouble. As for Tommy Robinson he has been branded far right, ONCE a member of the EDF he has not been a member of this or any group for many years but because he is willing to try and convince what this country is becoming he is silenced and anyone criticizing the government is jailed immediately. Yet we are forced to watch our Country go to the dogs only Yesterday A Forger from Vietnam has forged thousands of Documents  for Vietnamese residents to cross the channel. Not only is he living in the UK but is now  claiming asylum's into the UK this is why we demonstrate against this but we are not allowed to.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3yzq6px3eo

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Tommy Robinson is now locked up in  Solitary Confinement. The offenders placed in this are a danger to others and thus separated from other prisoners why ??is he a threat to society and security of England, or is it a case of go against us and this will be your punishment.

Edited by BarraMarra
  • Agree 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Tommy Robinson is now locked up in  Solitary Confinement. The offenders placed in this are a danger to others and thus separated from other prisoners why ??is he a threat to society and security of England, or is it a case of go against us and this will be your punishment.


Is he in solitary confinement?

 

He’s a threat to society because he is above the law.

 

He’s imprisoned having confessed to contempt of court.

 

 

Posted
Just now, BarraMarra said:

The cost of living Chomps.

Well that wasn’t down to migrants was it?

 

Maybe something to do with over a decade of austerity and other mismanagement of the economy.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:


Is he in solitary confinement?

 

He’s a threat to society because he is above the law.

 

He’s imprisoned having confessed to contempt of court.

 

 

You don't go into Solitary Confinement for contempt of court. Yo go there because your deemed a potential threat to the security of the Nation.

Posted
40 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Tommy Robinson is now locked up in  Solitary Confinement. The offenders placed in this are a danger to others and thus separated from other prisoners why ??is he a threat to society and security of England, or is it a case of go against us and this will be your punishment.

In the U.K. prisoners can be confined in isolation for a number of reasons. Perhaps for the safety of others or themselves. They might be waiting for alternative placement or be assessed as vulnerable.

 

In any case it's usually only for 21 days or 42 in special circumstances. Above that would need approval from the Secretary of State.

 

Source: The Howard League Society.

Posted
1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

You don't go into Solitary Confinement for contempt of court. Yo go there because your deemed a potential threat to the security of the Nation.

See my post above.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

You don't go into Solitary Confinement for contempt of court. Yo go there because your deemed a potential threat to the security of the Nation.

I’ve asked ‘is he in solitary confinement’?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well that wasn’t down to migrants was it?

 

Maybe something to do with over a decade of austerity and other mismanagement of the economy.

Tax's have to rise which is past onto the population everything increases in price so yes you can blame migrants demanding free benefits. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Tax's have to rise which is past onto the population everything increases in price so yes you can blame migrants demanding free benefits. 

The cost per UK prisoner per year is GBP 51,724. Tommy's bill to the UK taxpayer will be an extra 77,586.

 

Source: Statista UK.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...