Trump Sues CBS for $10 Billion Over Alleged Editing in Kamala Harris Interview

[pattayasan]

Just now, Lacessit said:

How do you know this?

 

I'm quite sure they did edit them. The vast majority of them.

[Lacessit]

Just now, pattayasan said:

 

I'm quite sure they did edit them. The vast majority of them.

IMO every news outlet, irrespective of political bent, edits interviews to fit a time constraint.

 

If a Trump interview was edited to eliminate lies and non-sequiturs, there would probably only be 30 seconds left of useable footage.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 11/2/2024 at 6:50 PM, pattayasan said:

 

A similar number to the times that Trump lied on their programs without being fact checked.

Link?

[thaibeachlovers]

3 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

I'm quite sure they did edit them. The vast majority of them.

If you don't prove that you are just making it up.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 11/2/2024 at 7:02 PM, billd766 said:

What a load of codswallop.

 

Have you anything to back up your words? 

 

Proof, links or anything?

One only needs to look at what the POTUS did the last few years to know he is a warmonger and she says she wouldn't have done anything different, ergo she is also a warmonger

[thaibeachlovers]

On 11/2/2024 at 7:08 PM, shdmn said:

Another frivolous lawsuit by the convicted felon that won't amount to anything, as usual.  Didn't CBS host The Apprentice at one time?  There are supposedly a lot of really ugly out takes of him making an arse of himself on that show.  

Seems supposedly is all you have, LOL.

[pattayasan]

9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If you don't prove that you are just making it up.

 

seriously?

[thaibeachlovers]

17 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

Obesity and incontinence are proven.

and?

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

seriously?

Yes.

[pattayasan]

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

Yes.

 

Do you think the majority of political interviews are simply cut and broadcasted as is? honestly?

[billd766]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

One only needs to look at what the POTUS did the last few years to know he is a warmonger and she says she wouldn't have done anything different, ergo she is also a warmonger

You also, have brought nothing in the way of proof to the discussion.

[riclag]

21 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Good luck Donald. 

 

The left wing MSM are out of control with their lies and gaslighting. 

This has always been a concern , I remember Fahrenheit  9/11 ,a Michael Moore movie confronting politicians about sending  their own kids to war. 

 

Snopes probably got inundated with fact check requests.

 

“ You know, when the guns are trained on her face, you know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee. Well, let's send, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy, but she's a stupid person. And I used to have, I have meetings with a lot of people, and she always wanted to go to war with people”.

 

https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/11/01/trump-threaten-liz-cheney-shot/

[Lacessit]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

One only needs to look at what the POTUS did the last few years to know he is a warmonger and she says she wouldn't have done anything different, ergo she is also a warmonger

If you think anyone can negotiate a peace with Putin which does not include a second Ukrainian genocide, you are utterly delusional.

 

Of course, being in New Zealand, you are as far away from the conflict as one can get, so it's very easy to be a peacenik.

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

You also, have brought nothing in the way of proof to the discussion.

Proof is always demanded of anyone leaning left, then dismissed as biased MSM.

 

It's very bad form to ask for proof from Trumpers, because all they have is Trump's lies on Truth Social and X.

[G_Money]

On 11/2/2024 at 5:44 AM, spidermike007 said:

Very typical for one of the most litigious and insecure men in the world. He is NOT a tribute to our gender. Hoping he loses big on Tuesday and then is sent to prison. The world would be a far better place. 

“Hoping he loses big on Tuesday and then is sent to prison “

 

So if a candidate loses the Presidential election they will be sent to prison?  Is this new?

Haven’t we been hearing this for years from leftists?

 

“This time it’s different, he’s really going this time.  He really is”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[G_Money]

32 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

If you think anyone can negotiate a peace with Putin which does not include a second Ukrainian genocide, you are utterly delusional.

 

Of course, being in New Zealand, you are as far away from the conflict as one can get, so it's very easy to be a peacenik.

Peacenik?

 

That’s one I haven’t heard in a long time.

 

Walter Cronkite evening news era coverage of the Vietnam War 

 

A time when MSM actually reported news.

 

Were you a beatnik in late 50’s?

 

Edited November 3 by G_Money

[Tug]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

One only needs to look at what the POTUS did the last few years to know he is a warmonger and she says she wouldn't have done anything different, ergo she is also a warmonger

WHAT!!!the United States invaded Ukraine so now Biden is a war monger???jee wizz there I thought Ukraine asked for our help to repel a looting raping criminal army from Russia…..obvious sarcasm alert….what rubbish Ukraine asked us and all the nato nations help in evicting the viscous Russian mob from their country.it is PUTIN who is the war monger not Joe Biden obviously 🙄 

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Peacenik?

 

That’s one I haven’t heard in a long time.

 

Walter Cronkite evening news era coverage of the Vietnam War 

 

A time when MSM actually reported news.

 

Were you a beatnik in late 50’s?

 

I agree, ‘peacenik’ doesn’t hit the mark.

 

’Peaceniks’ very rightly oppose Putin’s ongoing illegal war.

 

Apeasenik  is a far better fit.

 

 

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

Peacenik?

 

That’s one I haven’t heard in a long time.

 

Walter Cronkite evening news era coverage of the Vietnam War 

 

A time when MSM actually reported news.

 

Were you a beatnik in late 50’s?

 

Sorry to disappoint, no. I was hard-working.

[G_Money]

10 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Sorry to disappoint, no. I was hard-working.

Not disappointed.

 

 I think you misunderstood me.  
 

Beatnik is not a deadbeat

 

I believe you were neither.

 

Maybe that Thai lady misunderstood your Thai.

[billd766]

3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Proof is always demanded of anyone leaning left, then dismissed as biased MSM.

 

It's very bad form to ask for proof from Trumpers, because all they have is Trump's lies on Truth Social and X.

I just get bored with the same old same old lies, diversions etc.

 

I hope that it will all be over by Thursday, Thai time, but I think it will go on for the next 4 years

[Peabody]

Faux News: "Hold my microphone..."

[Brian Allen]

On 11/1/2024 at 6:50 PM, john donson said:

if CBS is public, paid by tax payer, than this is misleading and manipulation in the election

CBS is not Tax-Payer financed but is licensed and may:- if found to have committed election interference;- be delicensed and put out of business. I pray and trust.  

[still kicking]

7 hours ago, billd766 said:

You also, have brought nothing in the way of proof to the discussion.

No he is still busy counting sheep.

[jerrymahoney]

5 hours ago, Brian Allen said:

CBS is not Tax-Payer financed but is licensed and may:- if found to have committed election interference;- be delicensed and put out of business. I pray and trust.  

“It’s so bad they should lose their license, and they should take ’60 Minutes’ off the air,” Trump told right-wing podcaster Dan Bongino last week.
 

National networks like CBS are not licensed, but local stations are. (And the parent company of CBS, Paramount Global, owns some local stations.) The licensing agency is the government’s Federal Communications Commission, which grants eight-year license terms, and hasn’t denied any license renewal in decades.

 

The process “is so time consuming that no license renewal could be denied before the end of a hypothetical second Trump term,” public interest lawyer Andrew Jay Schwartzman told CNN.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/22/media/trump-strip-tv-station-licenses-punish-media/index.html

[Lacessit]

8 hours ago, billd766 said:

I just get bored with the same old same old lies, diversions etc.

 

I hope that it will all be over by Thursday, Thai time, but I think it will go on for the next 4 years

There is a way to cut the Gordian knot.

 

Biden or Harris order Trump is arrested for treason. No bail. Take him out of Mar-a-Lardo in handcuffs.

 

After all, the Supreme Court has confirmed presidential immunity, has it not?

[thaibeachlovers]

17 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

Do you think the majority of political interviews are simply cut and broadcasted as is? honestly?

I'd like to think so.

However, we live in such a rotten society anything is possible. We have yet to see the first AI fake interview ( far as I know ), but I have no doubt they are coming. I already believe nothing from politicians, but it's going to be difficult when the news organisations may also be untrustworthy

[thaibeachlovers]

8 hours ago, still kicking said:

No he is still busy counting sheep.

Time for the ignore function methinks. Bye.

[jerrymahoney]

11 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'd like to think so.

However, we live in such a rotten society anything is possible. We have yet to see the first AI fake interview ( far as I know ), but I have no doubt they are coming. I already believe nothing from politicians, but it's going to be difficult when the news organisations may also be untrustworthy

Here it is:

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/polish-radio-station-abandons-ai-presenters-outcry-115234983

 

Last Tuesday the station broadcast an “interview” conducted by an AI-generated presenter with a voice pretending to be Wisława Szymborska, a Polish poet and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature who died in 2012.

[thaibeachlovers]

15 hours ago, billd766 said:

You also, have brought nothing in the way of proof to the discussion.

You think I need to prove the obvious? When someone sends millions of $ worth of big bombs to kill children and women, one knows that they are a warmonger, and when someone says they wouldn't have done anything different it means that they support a war ergo a warmonger.

 

Perhaps you have a different opinion, do tell.