Watch: Kamala Harris Makes Surprise Saturday Night Live Appearance

[RSD1]

This was brilliant, both strategically and  politically. It was really well produced and executed. Right on point with just the right amount of humanity and humility and it will resonate really well with people in these final hours leading up to the election. Many thought Trump's move to go on Rogan was such a great idea. But that interview was such a failure in so many ways with Rogan even low-key trolling Trump at times. And SNL reaches such a wider audience, plus it is such higher quality than something like a bro chat with Rogan filled with gaffs and missteps. This SNL clip on the SNL YouTube channel has already had 8 million views, not to mention all the other millions of people that saw it live and from other media outlets as well. Well done, Kamala, you got this!

[impulse]

4 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

This was brilliant, both strategically and  politically. 

 

And illegal.  

 

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” (FCC Commissioner) Carr wrote on X, responding to an Associated Press article about Harris’s appearance. The campaign kept the appearance a secret until hours before air. 

 

 

[Hamus Yaigh]

2 minutes ago, impulse said:

And illegal.  

 

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” (FCC Commissioner) Carr wrote on X,

Complete nonsense. No prizes for guessing which orange face appointed Carr to the role to start with.

[herfiehandbag]

5 hours ago, neeray said:

Late in the game, the deadlock seems to have broken, as Kamala Harris has pulled ahead. Despite Trump's plan to declare himself as the winner on election night, no matter what, it will just become one more event where he makes a fool of himself.

Would you like to pick a time,I am running a book - no money involved, that would be wrong - but just for the fame and glory. I have selected 10.17 pm but other times are available!

[RSD1]

9 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

And illegal.  

 

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” (FCC Commissioner) Carr wrote on X, responding to an Associated Press article about Harris’s appearance. The campaign kept the appearance a secret until hours before air. 

 

 

Lol. Cry all you want. Trump's a convicted felon running for president. Nuff said. 

[pattayasan]

3 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Would you like to pick a time,I am running a book - no money involved, that would be wrong - but just for the fame and glory. I have selected 10.17 pm but other times are available!

 

What time was it last time? I'll take that time.

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, gargamon said:

Yes. Put Trump on SNL. That would be so entertaining.

He has been on years ago. A few times

[impulse]

8 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Complete nonsense. No prizes for guessing which orange face appointed Carr to the role to start with.

 

If Trump did appoint her, they've had almost 4 years to replace her.  Apparently, no complaints up until now...

 

[pattayasan]

Just now, frank83628 said:

He has been on years ago. A few times

 

Obviously still hasn't recovered from the emotional trauma from last time.

[frank83628]

30 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

They worship someone who is advocating shooting anybody who gets in his way. Twice in as many days.

Not true. Stop lying

[gargamon]

3 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

And illegal.  

 

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” (FCC Commissioner) Carr wrote on X, responding to an Associated Press article about Harris’s appearance. The campaign kept the appearance a secret until hours before air. 

 

 

Who cares. It was brilliant. You can't unring that bell. Trump is toast.

 

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

Obviously still hasn't recovered from the emotional trauma from last time.

Guess you haven't seen the skit then

[pattayasan]

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Not true. Stop lying

 

Why can't a politician running for president stop talking about shooting and guns in relation to those who oppose him?

[impulse]

Just now, gargamon said:

Who cares. It was brilliant. You can't unring that bell. Trump is toast.

 

Does anyone watch SNL any more?  I gave it up decades ago.

 

On the plus side, that's another lawsuit Trump can bring, against NBC's clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule.

 

That ought to be worth $100 mil if he can find the right venue.  Of course, he'll be too busy if he wins...

 

[cdemundo]

4 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

A violation of the equal time rule.

 

"Do the networks have to give equal time? In a word, no."

https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2019/do-the-networks-have-to-give-equal-time-in-a-word-no/

[pattayasan]

Just now, impulse said:

 

Does anyone watch SNL any more?  I gave it up decades ago.

 

On the plus side, that's another lawsuit Trump can bring, against NBC's clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule.

 

That ought to be worth $100 mil if he can find the right venue.  Of course, he'll be too busy if he wins...

 

 

It's election interference. It should be worth about $10 billion.

[Walker88]

Harris has a natural joy and positivism, in stark contrast to the felon.

 

With the felon, EVERYTHING is dark and the "worst ever", unless he can take credit for something good. He speaks of the country collapsing, when the economy, jobs, the stock market, personal spending, personal savings,manufacturing, and domestic energy production are booming.

 

Has anyone ever seen the felon laugh when he wasn't talking about violence? Personal opinion....but he's a psychopath. He has all the listed characteristics of psychopathy:

 

---an easy charm that fools a certain segment of people

---an inability to feel guilt

---zero empathy

---lying as easily as he breathes

---believing rules are for others, but not him

[cdemundo]

20 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

And illegal.  

 

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” (FCC Commissioner) Carr wrote on X, responding to an Associated Press article about Harris’s appearance. The campaign kept the appearance a secret until hours before air. 

 

 

"Do the networks have to give equal time? In a word, no."

https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2019/do-the-networks-have-to-give-equal-time-in-a-word-no/

 

You may be surprised to learn that retail establishments can now be open on Sundays as well.

 

[impulse]

2 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Harris has a natural joy and positivism, in stark contrast to the felon.

 

You mean like that sudden burst of energy that Biden had for that State of the Union?

 

I don't think I'd call that "natural".

 

[impulse]

Just now, cdemundo said:

"Do the networks have to give equal time? In a word, no."

https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2019/do-the-networks-have-to-give-equal-time-in-a-word-no/

 

You may be surprised to learn that retail establishments can now be open on Sundays as well.

 

You may want to take that up with the FCC Commissioner.

 

[neeray]

Just now, herfiehandbag said:

Would you like to pick a time,I am running a book - no money involved, that would be wrong - but just for the fame and glory. I have selected 10.17 pm but other times are available!

Great idea. I figure 11:47 PM, November 5. "It will be a landslide red wave all because of me, your favorite president and the greatest president in the history of America, the greatest. Thank you for making me Great Again (and keeping me out of jail)." DJT

[neeray]

Just now, gargamon said:

Who cares. It was brilliant. You can't unring that bell. Trump is toast.

 

Beautiful. I love it.

[earlinclaifornia]

20 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Would you like to pick a time,I am running a book - no money involved, that would be wrong - but just for the fame and glory. I have selected 10.17 pm but other times are available!

10:16 pm

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, neeray said:

Great idea. I figure 11:47 PM, November 5. "It will be a landslide red wave all because of me, your favorite president and the greatest president in the history of America, the greatest. Thank you for making me Great Again (and keeping me out of jail)." DJT

 

When are they gonna finish laundering his blue suit? Maybe he soiled it again.

[Walker88]

6 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Does anyone watch SNL any more?  I gave it up decades ago.

 

On the plus side, that's another lawsuit Trump can bring, against NBC's clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule.

 

That ought to be worth $100 mil if he can find the right venue.  Of course, he'll be too busy if he wins...

 

Lots of young people in the 18-25 year old age bracket watch it. Old curmudgeons probably do not, as they're probably watching Silence of the Lambs or replays of the felon performing fellatio on a microphone.

 

The age to vote in the US is 18. The show is nationwide, even in Red States and Swing States.

 

Great move, Ms Harris! For the win!

[frank83628]

8 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Why can't a politician running for president stop talking about shooting and guns in relation to those who oppose him?

The Liz Cheney thing has been debunked here, you were shown it to be out of context, yet youre still referencing now. 

[pattayasan]

8 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

The Liz Cheney thing has been debunked here, you were shown it to be out of context, yet youre still referencing now. 

 

I'm saying he uttered the name of his opponent and used the word guns in the same paragraph. Spin this dog whistle anyway you like it but we know what he's saying. Yes, the precise words would not hold up as a direct provable threat to kill in a court of law but this is the court of public opinion. As far as I'm concerned, any reference to guns, shooting and opponents by a politician is a dog whistle to the kind of nut case who follow Trump around like a dog.

 

We already have Gabby Giffords and Paul Pelosi as victims of this very incitement.

 

 

[neeray]

Just now, pattayasan said:

 

When are they gonna finish laundering his blue suit? Maybe he soiled it again.

It DEPENDS

[frank83628]

6 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I'm saying he uttered the name of his opponent and used the word guns in the same paragraph. Spin this dog whistle anyway you like it but we know what he's saying. Yes, the precise words would not hold up as a direct provable threat to kill in a court of law but this is the court of public opinion. As far as I'm concerned, any reference to guns, shooting and opponents by a politician is a dog whistle to the kind of nut case who follow Trump around like a dog.

 

 

Its not a dog whistle at all, it's proof the media can brainwash you so easily, you're already anti trump, they can say anything about him and you'll believe it hook, line and sinker. And people like you say trumpers are in a cult!!

The Liz Cheng suject is done, give it up

 

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Its not a dog whistle at all, it's proof the media can brainwash you so easily, you're already anti trump, they can say anything about him and you'll believe it hook, line and sinker. And people like you say trumpers are in a cult!!

The Liz Cheng suject is done, give it up

 

 

Was it not possible to avoid that kind of imagery and the resultant backlash? Should he have avoided it?