Media doesn't need to lie to turn me against Trump.

[0ffshore360]

3 minutes ago, flexomike said:

and your point is?

Addressing the denial of Trump Cultists .

Are you one?

[bubblegum]

11 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

i don't sit listening to the news all day long, when i hear some crap posted here about Trump i try to find the original footage so i can see what actually happened or was said. too many times the msm been caught lying and the usual TD posse here repeating it. like the last 5 threads for example, but, but, Trump.

roll on tomorrow, i'm hoping things go catastrophically wrong for all the derangement crew here!

 

where has Trump ever said he hadn't heard of Epstein ? are you lying again?

Yes Frank I'm always lying, good night.

[bubblegum]

16 minutes ago, Gobbler said:

The statement above makes no sense. 

 

Use the Justice Department to prove the media's complicity as traitors to the United States and the People. 

 

Upon conviction, publicly execute them one by one. 

I don't think you can say this kind of thinks asking for execution? 

[pattayasan]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

you have been given the context of what was said about Liz Cheny. yet here you are, spouting the same incorrect crap AGAIN! you just point blank refuse to accept anything other that what you believe. and you say Trumps supporters are in a cult!

 

I want specifically to understand the significance and apparent coincidence or otherwise of the fact that Trump twice mentioned opponents and invoked images of shooting in the space of two days. To be clear, it is utterly irrelevant to me why each comment was made in relation to the individuals criticized (I don't even know who exactly the other person was), however I was struck by the powerball like chance of this being random and without intent.

[pattayasan]

54 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

So basically Trump being Trump and joking around.  You guys are pretty desperate for anything to pin on him.  🙄

 

That's always the goto position isn't it? He's only joking. He doesn't really mean that. You guys have no sense of humor. How did I do?

[cdemundo]

7 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I want specifically to understand the significance and apparent coincidence or otherwise of the fact that Trump twice mentioned opponents and invoked images of shooting in the space of two days. To be clear, it is utterly irrelevant to me why each comment was made in relation to the individuals criticized (I don't even know who exactly the other person was), however I was struck by the powerball like chance of this being random and without intent.

And the award for consistently and stubbornly missing the point goes to....

[pattayasan]

Just now, cdemundo said:

And the award for consistently and stubbornly missing the point goes to....

 

I have never deviated from this precise question. Nobody deigns to answer it as asked.

[cdemundo]

Just now, pattayasan said:

 

I have never deviated from this precise question. Nobody deigns to answer it as asked.

QED

[pattayasan]

Just now, cdemundo said:

QED

 

I could say the same. Or mumble something about defending the indefensible.

[dinsdale]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Trump was talking about the bullet proof glass he was standing behind and that if someone was going to try assassinate him again the media would get it first, as they were in front of him, he said something like 'i don't mind that', i haven't heard it all or exactly what was said but again, he didn't call for the media to be shot, just another derangement crew twisting the words, no doubt will find the unedited clip on X later and post it.

 

 

His actual words were "To get me someone would have to shoot through the fake news and I don't mind that so much." 

[proton]

Anybody voting Harris could only be doing so in blind party loyalty, which would not be so bad if she were not such a weak, clueless and inarticulate candidate. They cannot possibly be voting based on her record, abilities, character and honesty.

[cdemundo]

5 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I could say the same. Or mumble something about defending the indefensible.

Once again, you didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I posted.

I wasn't defending Trump, the number of things that he has said and done that disqualify him from the presidency are so numerous they cannot be counted.

I was criticizing the media for lying about his Liz Cheney remark which many have unambiguously done.

 

I don't need to lie to criticize Trump.

 

 

Edited November 4 by cdemundo

[CallumWK]

49 minutes ago, bunnydrops said:

You should give a link for that as I haven't seen any mention of firing squad.

 

Just another Liberal lie from you, as I'm sure you have seen the links, and even supported them.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/2024/11/01/the-liberal-media-is-in-meltdown-its-attacks-on-donald-trum/

[Lacessit]

Just now, proton said:

Anybody voting Harris could only be doing so in blind party loyalty, which would not be so bad if she were not such a weak, clueless and inarticulate candidate. They cannot possibly be voting based on her record, abilities, character and honesty.

Perhaps you missed the debate, where she filleted Trump like a trout.

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, cdemundo said:

Once again, you didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I posted.

I wasn't defending Trump, the things that he has said and done that disqualify him from the presidency cannot be counted.

I was criticizing the media for lying about his Liz Cheney remark which many have unambiguously done.

 

 

I was not criticizing what you posted beyond complaining that nobody had the wherewithal to respond to the question I asked in a good faith manner. No attempt at all to allay my concern that mentioning shooting in relation to opponents twice in two days was even slightly problematic.

[proton]

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

Perhaps you missed the debate, where she filleted Trump like a trout.

 

Not the debate I saw, but then if she just stood there and said nothing some would claim the same thing.

[pattayasan]

5 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Once again, you didn't read, or didn't comprehend what I posted.

I wasn't defending Trump, the number of things that he has said and done that disqualify him from the presidency are so numerous they cannot be counted.

I was criticizing the media for lying about his Liz Cheney remark which many have unambiguously done.

 

I don't need to lie to criticize Trump.

 

 

 

I didn't accuse you of lying, I accused you of repeatedly deflecting my question.

[CallumWK]

2 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Not the debate I saw, but then if she just stood there and said nothing some would claim the same thing.

 

I was able to get a transcript of what she said during the debate.

 

[metisdead]

Please continue in the same topic running here:

 

 

//Closed//