Jump to content

A Radical Experiment: How Elon Musk Could Shake Up Washington


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

The federal government is preparing for a major shift as one of Silicon Valley’s most renowned disruptors, Elon Musk, prepares to tackle bureaucracy at the highest level. President-elect Donald Trump announced that Musk would lead a new initiative called the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), intended to root out waste, fraud, and inefficiency across federal operations. The project is unprecedented, and questions remain about which parts of the government Musk’s new office will target and how seriously Washington will take the endeavor.

 

Musk isn’t taking on this challenge alone. Joining him is Vivek Ramaswamy, a biotech investor and outspoken MAGA supporter who recently ran against Trump in the GOP primary. Both Musk and Ramaswamy come from outside the D.C. establishment and bring a fresh perspective that has the potential to radically reshape federal bureaucracy. They plan to infuse their outsider mindset into the realm of government reform, approaching it with the same disruptive mindset that has shaped Musk’s ventures in technology and industry.

 

Trump's announcement, shared on Truth Social, described the initiative in his characteristic grandiose terms, calling it potentially the “Manhattan Project” of the current era, with the power to “send shockwaves through the system.” Trump and Musk first publicly discussed the project during a live interview on X, where Trump had previously proposed cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget. The timeline or specifics of this proposed cut remain ambiguous; if it were to be achieved annually, it would mean substantial reductions that could encompass all non-entitlement spending, including even defense. The scope of such a cut would be unprecedented, raising questions about its feasibility and the extent to which Congress, including its more conservative members, would support such an ambitious goal.

 

Musk’s influence in Washington, however, remains uncertain. While he has pledged to support candidates aligned with his views in upcoming Republican primaries through his political action committee (PAC), his early influence has shown mixed results. Notably, Musk’s preferred candidate for Senate majority leader, Rick Scott of Florida, lost out to Senator John Thune of South Dakota, a more established GOP figure. These early signs suggest that while Musk has the ambition to steer Congress toward his efficiency goals, his power to shape leadership decisions in Washington might be more limited than anticipated.

 

Musk’s management style—famously intense and results-driven—could redefine federal oversight if applied broadly across government agencies. Known for his tough approach at X and Tesla, Musk is likely to push for similar stringent oversight in the federal sector. Environmental programs, labor initiatives, and spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion might all face scrutiny, given Musk’s prior public statements on such topics and his preference for lean, results-oriented budgets.

 

Ramaswamy’s plans, meanwhile, are still developing. In a recent post on X, he announced a plan to crowdsource examples of government “waste, fraud … and abuse,” signaling that DOGE might actively engage the public in identifying areas for reform. This approach underscores the project’s outsider ethos, potentially inviting fresh perspectives on federal spending and encouraging public involvement in government oversight.

 

While proponents of government efficiency may find the project intriguing, many remain skeptical. The scale of the proposed cuts and the radical approach Musk and Ramaswamy bring may prove challenging in a city where long-standing procedures and entrenched interests often slow down or block swift changes. For Washington, this venture represents a bold experiment, one that could transform federal bureaucracy—or falter under the weight of resistance from within.

 

Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-15

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elon is a smart cookie, and Vivek is no slug. But the Washington swamp is deep and treacherous.  They need to come up with a plan that is so quick and effective, that the swamp monsters don't have time to react or wreak vengeance. 

 

Something along the lines of a blitzkrieg attack - a full court press across multiple fronts that prevents the various swamp creatures and TLA agencies from helping to defend each other and bog the two Likely Lads down in litigation.

 

I have no idea what that might look like. Maybe something as simple as disabling all the access cards and cellphones of a selected  80% of government employees at 02:59 on a Sunday.

 

Whatever they do, they have to wreak instant havoc in every department to avoid being devoured by the swamp.

 

And let's face it. If every government department did absolutely nothing for a month, the world would be a much happier place. I think Musk is well aware of this. He would have no issue with government coming to a total standstill. :coffee1:

Edited by Gsxrnz
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Gsxrnz said:

Elon is a smart cookie, and Vivek is no slug. But the Washington swamp is deep and treacherous.  They need to come up with a plan that is so quick and effective, that the swamp monsters don't have time to react or wreak vengeance. 

 

Something along the lines of a blitzkrieg attack - a full court press across multiple fronts that prevents the various swamp creatures and TLA agencies from helping to defend each other and bog the two Likely Lads down in litigation.

 

I have no idea what that might look like. Maybe something as simple as disabling all the access cards and cellphones of a selected  80% of government employees at 02:59 on a Sunday.

 

Whatever they do, they have to wreak instant havoc in every department to avoid being devoured by the swamp.

 

And let's face it. If every government department did absolutely nothing for a month, the world would be a much happier place. I think Musk is well aware of this. He would have no issue with government coming to a total standstill. :coffee1:

The government shuts down every couple of years. Nobody gives a single crap until around the time the air controllers will stop working and the airports may close. The federal government offers very little of value.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, RichardColeman said:

Better to run the country with successful business men than lifetime politicians that have never achieved anything 

Please define "a successful business man" and provide some examples of same.

 

Why only business man and not business woman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JimHuaHin said:

Please define "a successful business man" and provide some examples of same.

 

Why only business man and not business woman?

 

Possibly because the two subjects of the article have, at least in the face of observable evidence,  XY chromosomes. It would be a serious matter if they were mis-gendered. :coffee1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichardColeman said:

Better to run the country with successful business men than lifetime politicians that have never achieved anything 


Republicans love to yak about that. They did during the Reagan administration. Loved to tout, 'running government like a business'.  Reagan had massive government spending, while making tax cuts, that was capped by Black Monday, in 87. Followed by the largest financial disaster & monetary loss until the 2008 Wall Street implosion. Deregulating the Savings & Loans was indeed a "winner". Poor old Bush 1 was left with the mess, the financial recession caused by all this and out in 92. 




 

Edited by Dcheech
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Drain the swamp Elon.

 

Trump and X owner Musk, what a partnership. No wonder the Libs are crying into their lentil soup. 

Ya but for how long before direct and growing conflict and disappointment will see him joining former confidants booted from Trump's administration. I am counting the days when these 2 egoistic men with tons of self interests clashed and go separate ways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...