Ben Zioner Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said: Obviously, Putin did that - and he claims he was provoked. My point is that more and more escalation is bad for everybody. Is it easy to stand back and let the others do something bad? No. But maybe we should not directly use that as a reason for more escalation. Let's try to be calm and think twice. This will never work with Putin, who is having a laugh when facing weak and disjointed adversaries such as the EU and US. What is needed right now is a a 2% or 3% war sales tax across the EU. These populations must contribute heavily to the war effort, otherwise they'll have nothing to complain about what is going to happen. 1
The Old Bull Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 34 minutes ago, mfd101 said: The problem with the 'Surrender Immediately' guys above is that, on that basis the Russians could go all the way to Portugal without anyone lifting a finger to stop them. All Putin has to do is growl loudly and everyone surrenders. Then Xi could walk in to Taiwan, not to mention Laos, Vietnam , Cambodia & Thailand ... Don't believe American bull<deleted> .Xi has a lot of support in Taiwan. When it becomes beneficial for them to join mainland China they will. 1 1
mfd101 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, The Old Bull said: Don't believe American bull<deleted> .Xi has a lot of support in Taiwan. When it becomes beneficial for them to join mainland China they will. That sounds like CCP bull. 1
RichardColeman Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Putin is only using this weapon as a bargaining chip in negotiations NOT to pay reparations 1
Popular Post pattayasan Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, dinsdale said: Right well I guess sometime in the next two months the world is going to end. Do you realize how MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) you sound? You don't seem to be condemning Putin for his threat of first use. Why is that? 1 1 1
dinsdale Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, pattayasan said: You don't seem to be condemning Putin for his threat of first use. Why is that? It's a threat. It's what Putin does. He's done it before. It's an EMPTY threat. I've said that retaliation will come and it has and will. I've also said nukes won't be used and they won't. As for Putin using a threat of 1st strike I do believe this time round it was after Biden sanctioned the use of ATACMS and I don't hear you condemning Biden for escalating the war. Why is that? 2
Popular Post john donson Posted 6 hours ago Popular Post Posted 6 hours ago are Europeans that dumb to go die for no reason ? ukraine is not even a democracy war mongers and banks love wars 1 1 4
pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, dinsdale said: It's a threat. It's what Putin does. He's done it before. It's an EMPTY threat. I've said that retaliation will come and it has and will. I've also said nukes won't be used and they won't. As for Putin using a threat of 1st strike I do believe this time round it was after Biden sanctioned the use of ATACMS and I don't hear you condemning Biden for escalating the war. Why is that? So you don't like to condemn empty threats?
dinsdale Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, pattayasan said: So you don't like to condemn empty threats? So you don't condemn Biden escalating the war? Less see. Empty treat=no deaths. Biden's escalation = an increase in deaths not only in Kursk but in Ukraine. It seems you're ok with this. 1 1
pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, dinsdale said: So you don't condemn Biden escalating the war? Less see. Empty treat=no deaths. Biden's escalation = an increase in deaths not only in Kursk but in Ukraine. It seems you're ok with this. Putin escalated the war, Biden responded to 10,000 foreign troops being recruited to fight for Russia. 1 1
lordgrinz Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago $380 Billion in foreign aid has already been spent on this war, at taxpayers expense, that should tell you all you need to know. 1 1
pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, lordgrinz said: $380 Billion in foreign aid has already been spent on this war, at taxpayers expense, that should tell you all you need to know. Yes, it tells us that taxpayers fund government spending. 1
JonnyF Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Thanks Joe. Great job. I guess it was too much to expect him to leave quietly without inflicting further damage on the world. 1 1
Popular Post pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Popular Post Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Thanks Joe. Great job. I guess it was too much to expect him to leave quietly without inflicting further damage on the world. He should suddenly stop doing his job? Leave quietly? Are you kidding me? Jeez. 2 1
dinsdale Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Just now, pattayasan said: Putin escalated the war, Biden responded to 10,000 foreign troops being recruited to fight for Russia. That is just a smoke screen. 10,000 questionably trained North Korean troops that don't speak Russian are going to have little to no impact. Apart from this there is zero evidence that these troops are actively engaged in Kursk. The sanctioning of the ATACMS, Storm Shadow and anti personnel mines has nothing to do with it. The fact is North Korea has been supplying Russia with weapons and ammunition for quite some time. 1
dinsdale Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 9 minutes ago, lordgrinz said: $380 Billion in foreign aid has already been spent on this war, at taxpayers expense, that should tell you all you need to know. Biden is seeking to cancel $4.6 billion of Ukraine's debt. Edited 5 hours ago by dinsdale
pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, dinsdale said: Biden is seeking to cancel $4.6 billion of Ukraine's debt. So? Ukraine needs help against an invasive pest. 1 1 1
JonnyF Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, pattayasan said: He should suddenly stop doing his job? Leave quietly? Are you kidding me? Jeez. Not starting world wars would suffice. 1
pattayasan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, JonnyF said: Not starting world wars would suffice. Or insurrections instead of leaving quietly. 1
Eric Loh Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Russia has been threatening nuclear war since 1999 when Yeltsin warned US. They threatened nuclear over 2007 missle defence, threatened Poland over US missle shield and again during the Crimea war. Over 2 dozens nuclear threats over the years. Putin know it is the end game if he use nuclear weapons. Russia will be isolated economically. China and India which are their biggest trading partners have warned them against using nuclear and will have to halt economic ties. It will be end for Russia and Putin if he goes nuclear. He knows it. His threats are becoming more desperate and he is near to his finishing line.
JonnyF Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, pattayasan said: Or insurrections instead of leaving quietly. I think a few loons in fancy dress are preferable to WW3. But that's just me. 1
parallelman Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Imo, if V.P. extends the war elslewhere he will only do so by using tactical nukes. He thought he would take Ukrane in a very short time but his conventional weapons have not been successful in doing that. So he must realise that making strikes anywhere else with the same type of weopons will also be unsuccessful (in terms of winning 'the day' as it were). That leaves him with only the nuke option. But even then he must realise that if doesn't kill (all) his opposition in a first strike Russia will suffer from nuclear strikes too.
parallelman Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Imo, if V.P. extends the war elslewhere he will only do so by using tactical nukes. He thought he would take Ukrane in a very short time but his conventional weapons have not been successful in doing that. So he must realise that making strikes anywhere else with the same type of weopons will also be unsuccessful (in terms of winning 'the day' as it were). That leaves him with only the nuke option. But even then he must realise that if doesn't kill (all) his opposition in a first strike Russia will suffer from nuclear strikes too.
Summerinsiam Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Another ridiculous and misleading article that is driven by pure hyperbole. No, thankfully Europe is not preparing for all out war. All those concerned, including Putin, understand that a war between nuclear powers can never be fought, as it would likely turn nuclear and the doctrine of mutually assured destruction still holds true today. While Putin's threats should be taken seriously, analysts concur that he will most likely retaliate through hybrid warfare, while continuing with the nuclear saber-rattling. Its not in his interests anyway; a Trump presidency is looming and he is clearly winning conventionally. All analysts are in agreement that the recent change in policy with regard to long range missiles has come too little and too late. They are a desperate attempt to slow down the Russian advance and salvage something from a misguided proxy war. While serving as an escalation, it will not affect the Russian momentum or have any significant strategic effect. It is now clear to everyone that in the long term Ukraine cannot win or reclaim its lost territory. It doesn't have the weapons or manpower. Even Zelenskey, as reality finally dawns, now says that Crimea can only be regained through diplomacy. It is high time that reality and pragmatism come to the fore, and for the sake of all concerned, not least Ukraine, that negotiations begin on some kind of ceasefire. 2
dinsdale Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 40 minutes ago, Summerinsiam said: Another ridiculous and misleading article that is driven by pure hyperbole. No, thankfully Europe is not preparing for all out war. All those concerned, including Putin, understand that a war between nuclear powers can never be fought, as it would likely turn nuclear and the doctrine of mutually assured destruction still holds true today. While Putin's threats should be taken seriously, analysts concur that he will most likely retaliate through hybrid warfare, while continuing with the nuclear saber-rattling. Its not in his interests anyway; a Trump presidency is looming and he is clearly winning conventionally. All analysts are in agreement that the recent change in policy with regard to long range missiles has come too little and too late. They are a desperate attempt to slow down the Russian advance and salvage something from a misguided proxy war. While serving as an escalation, it will not affect the Russian momentum or have any significant strategic effect. It is now clear to everyone that in the long term Ukraine cannot win or reclaim its lost territory. It doesn't have the weapons or manpower. Even Zelenskey, as reality finally dawns, now says that Crimea can only be regained through diplomacy. It is high time that reality and pragmatism come to the fore, and for the sake of all concerned, not least Ukraine, that negotiations begin on some kind of ceasefire. Please stop posting immediately. You may cause some damage to the brains of those who have no common sense or grasp on reality as they try to think up a stupid response to your post other than the obligatory laughing, sad or confused emoji. Thank you. Edited 3 hours ago by dinsdale 1 1
transam Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, dinsdale said: Biden is seeking to cancel $4.6 billion of Ukraine's debt. Ooooooh, it's MONEY that's your thing, NOT freedom....................Oh well.... Must be a Trump follower...........🤕 2
dinsdale Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, transam said: Ooooooh, it's MONEY that's your thing, NOT freedom....................Oh well.... Must be a Trump follower...........🤕 It's the tax payers money. You know the one's that can't afford to go shopping. Wow! I nearly hit submit. Wait a minute............ 1
Peterphuket Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, Chivas said: We are completely sleep walking into WW3 Nobody should be under any illusion this is the worst situation since the Cuban missile crisis My home City in UK would be the first wiped off the map because of the huge naval base Safer in Thailand but for how long Well count on china also biding its time, so whether we are that safe here is also in doubt.
daejung Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: When I read insulting posts like yours it makes me realise that I am probably superior to at least one person on the planet. I am french and think that @Tailwagsdog is right Edited 3 hours ago by daejung 1
transam Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 10 minutes ago, dinsdale said: It's the tax payers money. You know the one's that can't afford to go shopping. Wow! I nearly hit submit. Wait a minute............ Nice try, but everything the Government does is taxpayers money, but YOU think it should not be used to support freedom, you are an insult to those from your country that fought and died for freedom, and not money..... 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now