Jump to content

Oh look! Jack Smith has filed a motion to drop charges against Pres. Elect Donald Trump!


Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, EveryG said:

Trump is still eligible for prison in 2028 and charges can be filed again in the numerous cases where there is overwhelming evidence he broke the law, especially the classified documents case. 

 

Trump for prison 2028!

You really need to give up on that, most of you have been chirping it sicmnce 2016, not going to happen

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

You really need to give up on that, most of you have been chirping it sicmnce 2016, not going to happen

These foreigners have no clue as to the American citizens resolve.!I’ve never considered at anytime of hating 

the Brits.

That being said The Tyrannical government at the time of our founding fathers considered the founders criminals , scoundrels, disloyal to the whims of the tyrannical King and if captured would of been hanged !

 

This fascination of jailing Trump by the dems & his haters only made Americans more determined to fight for the cause of electing him to be 47.

 

America wasn’t a banana republic until Stalinist tactics (lawfare)were used by the dems in a attempt to destroy a political opponent!

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, ubonr1971 said:

Hard to believe this conman will evade prison. He's just a crim with a fancy suit on laughing at the justice system. He wins again... Daft Americans who voted him in. 


Bogus charges. They finally realized they should of never pressed charges in the first place 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, AlexRich said:


Trump’s a natural born criminal, always has been. It will be fun watching the country get looted by the Trump crime family and their associates. It will be like the Putin regime - it’s okay to extort, corrupt and engage in wide ranging malfeasance - just as long as a “tribute” is paid to the Big Guy. 
 

In the book “Putin’s People” by Catherine Belton she told a story about Putin being unhappy with an official he promoted because he was not on the take. He was unhappy he wasn’t stealing - which meant Putin wasn’t getting his share. 
 

The problem for these people is greed - they steal so much they can’t risk giving up power, because they are scared the assets will be taken off them once their power is gone. So they have to stay in power forever. Will be interesting to see whether Trump seeks a 3rd term, with the help of the bought and paid for Supreme Court. 
 

And when it happens all the MAGA morons will be on here defending the move. 

 

you live in Trunp derangement land!

You know Joe Biden already has 'the big guy' patented for his treasonous back handers from Ukraine and China, you need to come up with something better for Mr Putin.

I'm also sure Cathrine hasn't even set foot on Russian territory and  just writes fictional nonsense for gullible sheep like yourself.

 

Trump already had 4 years and he didn't loot the country.

 

What a whopper

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

It is very simple. You can't get a conviction on a sitting president. You can in some other countries, but not in the US. So why bother? Yet he is guilty. Very, very guilty. 


Sorry, no conviction.  Not guilty.

 

Surprised at your facist attitude.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, AlexRich said:

The US is soon to be a transnational crime organisation run by traitors, crooks and fraudsters. Looks like God didn’t bless America. 


Are you nuts?  You just described what the USA  currently is.

 

Trump and his dream team will change the course, for the better.

 

You’re not even a U.S. citizen are you?

Edited by G_Money
  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

you live in Trunp derangement land!

You know Joe Biden already has 'the big guy' patented for his treasonous back handers from Ukraine and China, you need to come up with something better for Mr Putin.

I'm also sure Cathrine hasn't even set foot on Russian territory and  just writes fictional nonsense for gullible sheep like yourself.

 

Trump already had 4 years and he didn't loot the country.

 

What a whopper


Good to know you have done your homework on Finanicial Times Moscow correspondent Catherine Belton … with access to all the past and present power brokers in Moscow. 
 

For anyone that really wants to understand Putin’s Russia I’d recommend this book, Putin’s People. 
 

For anyone who just wants BS that suits your political views check out Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Tucker Carlson, QAnon … and last but not least Hulk Hogan. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

 

39 minutes ago, AlexRich said:


Good to know you have done your homework on Finanicial Times Moscow correspondent Catherine Belton … with access to all the past and present power brokers in Moscow. 
 

For anyone that really wants to understand Putin’s Russia I’d recommend this book, Putin’s People. 
 

For anyone who just wants BS that suits your political views check out Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Tucker Carlson, QAnon … and last but not least Hulk Hogan. 

I'm sure it cam be found in the fiction department 

  • Love It 1
Posted
3 hours ago, EveryG said:

Trump is still eligible for prison in 2028 and charges can be filed again in the numerous cases where there is overwhelming evidence he broke the law, especially the classified documents case. 

 

Trump for prison 2028!

Filed "without prejudice". This is effectively shorthand for saying: 'whilst I am trying to reach a settlement with you, I'm not admitting any part of the case or conceding or waiving any arguments or rights. As such the charge can be legally revived, ie., end of 47th POTUS Trump's term.

  • Haha 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

Trump was convicted on all 34 counts in NY on May 30, 2024, becoming the first U.S. president to be convicted of a felony by a jury. A Grand Jury had recommended prosecution. No politics involved.

Of course there wasn't any politics involved. 🙄

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

It is very simple. You can't get a conviction on a sitting president. You can in some other countries, but not in the US. So why bother? Yet he is guilty. Very, very guilty. 

 

Last time i checked unless you live in some sort of tyrannical dictatorship you have the presumption of innocence when accused. Shall we respect that or do you want to take the Hungarian Hitler approach?

Posted
8 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Trump was convicted on all 34 counts in NY on May 30, 2024, becoming the first U.S. president to be convicted of a felony by a jury. A Grand Jury had recommended prosecution. No politics involved.

 

If there were no politics involved than why didn't hon. merchan follow thru with sentencing 11 Nov?

Posted

jan 6, is it not in the constitution that when  'we' the people blabla 

 

was not really a revolution because they would have ended anybody involved,  france 1789 style

 

what about all the instigating undercover FBI agents stirring the crowd?

Posted
12 hours ago, Albo said:

The nation has spoken and it entirely disagrees with everything Harris and her voters stand for.

The US citizens vote for Trump, correct. And he should be their president.

But that should have nothing to do with any legal cases. Only because someone will become president is no reason to ignore his crimes and other legal cases against him.

But then, in your case, you seem to be not even able to acknowledge that there are lots of legal outstanding cases against him. 

Posted
1 minute ago, OneMoreFarang said:

The US citizens vote for Trump, correct. And he should be their president.

But that should have nothing to do with any legal cases. Only because someone will become president is no reason to ignore his crimes and other legal cases against him.

But then, in your case, you seem to be not even able to acknowledge that there are lots of legal outstanding cases against him. 

 

In other news today.

 

President Joe Biden faces an unprecedented and deeply personal decision: whether to pardon or commute the sentences of his son, Hunter Biden, who is set to be sentenced in two separate criminal cases this December. These cases—one involving a 2018 gun purchase while struggling with drug addiction and the other for tax fraud—pose not just legal and familial challenges but also political and historical ones.  

 

And Hunter isn't even President

Posted
12 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

In other news today.

 

President Joe Biden faces an unprecedented and deeply personal decision: whether to pardon or commute the sentences of his son, Hunter Biden, who is set to be sentenced in two separate criminal cases this December. These cases—one involving a 2018 gun purchase while struggling with drug addiction and the other for tax fraud—pose not just legal and familial challenges but also political and historical ones.  

 

And Hunter isn't even President

 

Do you know the important part of above? It's the fact that Biden struggle with the decision. As father, he obviously wants to support his son, as president, he knows that he shouldn't use his position for personal reasons.

For Trump this would be much easier. He pardons just everybody who he likes and who gives him something in return.

 

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

Do you know the important part of above? It's the fact that Biden struggle with the decision. As father, he obviously wants to support his son, as president, he knows that he shouldn't use his position for personal reasons.

For Trump this would be much easier. He pardons just everybody who he likes and who gives him something in return.

 

 

 

Do you know the importance of your Trump hate post?

 

Biden WILL pardon his criminal son, that isn't even an if, but as a liberal Trump hater, you will condone that.

 

And the post I replied to was not about who Trump pardons, but if Trump should be pardoned. To good try on changing the subject, but no cigar

Edited by CallumWK
Posted

This is good news for people like me who still hold lots of secrets from our days in the agency and carrying TS/SCI  and (actual) Q clearances (not the silly Q as in QAnon, but Q as in a clearance to see nuclear related intel at the DoE).

 

It's okay to use highly classified material in any way we so choose. Eff US national security. Monetize the secrets if that is to one's advantage.

 

I was fortunate enough to become wealthy after I left the agency, but folks still working there, who now know both intelligence and the US itself are dying or dead, might as well use their knowledge for personal advantage.

 

Imagine what Putin would pay to know whom in his inner circle is a clandestine asset for the CIA ! Even al Qaeda is flush with cash, and they would pay to know what US intel knows. And then there's weapons systems...China and Russia would love to know what the US military can do, and what is in the pipeline. Ka-ching! It's auction time!

 

45 stole highly classified intel regarding everything from nukes to weapons systems to order of battle to identities of clandestine assets in hostile nations or areas. I have no doubt whatsoever he intended to monetize it, as clearly he needed cash (why else would he schlepp silly NFTs, golden sneakers, commemorative coins, Chines-made Bibles, Chinese watches, and now rip offs of Les Paul guitars?) If it's good for the goose.....

 

SC Smith is wise enough to know the system is broken. Institutions failed. The rule of law no longer exists in many ways. Some folks are above the law. Even the stacked Supreme Court says Madison and Jefferson were wrong and that the US is kind of a monarchy. Little guys---like a guy who took a doc or two home to work on the weekend---get 12 years in jail, but a guy who put national security and the identities of clandestine assets and programs at risk gets re-elected to the White House.

 

The people got what they think they want, but it will come with consequences. Liaison cooperation is finished for at least the next 4 years. No more Five Eyes. Also, no sharing of intel with non-Five Eyes nations like France, Japan, South Korea, Israel, etc.  They all know 47 cannot be trusted, and neither can Tulsi Gabbard be trusted. The risks that were thwarted because of liaison cooperation now have a wide open door to get the US. So be it. That's what the democratic majority wanted, so give it to them in spades. Terror attack, dirty bomb, bioterror, disrupt the electric grid, poison water supplies....enjoy!

 

In the meantime, my former colleagues, see what you've got and think of who might make your 401K sing paying for it.

 

Anybody want to know what Putin has on 47 and who told me? It's going to cost you.

Posted
33 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

The US citizens vote for Trump, correct. And he should be their president.

But that should have nothing to do with any legal cases. Only because someone will become president is no reason to ignore his crimes and other legal cases against him.

But then, in your case, you seem to be not even able to acknowledge that there are lots of legal outstanding cases against him. 

 

First, standing Presidents cannot be tried for anything. You were too lazy to research before you posted so here it is:

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_immunity_in_the_United_States

 

That is a good thing, it's a constitutional thing. Too bad you don't have one.

 

Lots? Of course you'd cited them all. Truth is you haven't a clue.

 

Which brings me to the second point. There are no "crimes" that Trump "committed"  that have not been adjudicated - therefore, no crimes. Notes below*

 

There are technically two cases left I believe that Trump is involved in. The Georgia trial which is fraught with legal issues on the procecutorial side. It was always the weakest both in substance and procecution

 

Then, need to unwind that insane E Jean Carroll civil conviction. You know the woman that was assaulted some time in the 90s (she can't even recall the year). This was a civil case as a criminal case could not pass the sniff test. 85M USD for allegedly feeling up some milf in a dressing room in a probably now bankrupt department store. The jury in the civil case did not find Trump guilt of rape. Another hit job.

 

You simply don't know Lightning. Kindly don't post disinformation. Cite your sources.

Posted
11 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Filed "without prejudice". This is effectively shorthand for saying: 'whilst I am trying to reach a settlement with you, I'm not admitting any part of the case or conceding or waiving any arguments or rights. As such the charge can be legally revived, ie., end of 47th POTUS Trump's term.

 

No it's not. It's stating that there was at that juncture no procecutorial malfeasance that would call for a prejudicial dismissal. Mind you the case had not even gone to trial and absolutely even if found guilty by the Swamp creatures would be aquitted upon appeal. One of the cases was already tossed out , but Smith being the good minion quickly fabricated other angles and set for retrial.

Posted
2 minutes ago, In Full Agreement said:

 

 

We all knew Trump is above the law.

 

 

 

We ALL didn't know anything of the sort. Being above the law would require charges not brought against him. Kinda like Joe Biden, the entire Biden family and the vast majority of his stupid gay cabinet

 

Please explain otherwise. EXPLAIN.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...