Trump's Sex Crime Cabinet

[EveryG]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

He was not found guilty of rape,  you can scream it until you are blue in the face...  actually I expect you already are.

And you can scream this until you are blue in the face, I never said he was. 

 

This is a literal strawman...oh wait, logical fallacies are like the MAGA SOP. 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, EveryG said:

Again, your reading comprehension shocks me over and over. I was not accusing YOU of denying the fact of his convictions, but saying MAGAs will deny all of the evidence contained in those convictions. Same for all of the other examples. It's hard to tell if you are incapable or if you mind is just so twisted by ideology that you cannot read. Either way, no evidence will convince you that Trump committed sexual assault, that he committed criminal fraud, and that he committed fraud. 

So still no evidence then? 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, EveryG said:

Wrong. There was that picture of them together shown at the trial. You. Are. A. Clown.

 

 

Ironically, as Trump was lying saying that he never met her during his deposition, Carroll's lawyer showed him this picture. When asked who that woman was, he said it was Marla Maples. So Trump blew his entire defense up because they proved he did know her and that he would have been attracted to her at least in the same manner he was his own wife. The jury saw the taped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

 

Your reading comprehension skills seems to be lacking. I was asking for evidence of a sexual assault. Still nothing. Oops.

 

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

 

[Eric Loh]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Your reading comprehension skills seems to be lacking. I was asking for evidence of a sexual assault. Still nothing. Oops.

 

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

 

Evidently you didn’t read the transcript. Jury convicted him because he was lying. That’s perjury or tampering with evidence .
 

The jury saw thetaped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Evidently you didn’t read the transcript. Jury convicted him because he was lying. That’s perjury or tampering with evidence .
 

The jury saw thetaped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

What did he lie about? 

[Eric Loh]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

What did he lie about? 

Nothing. Go back to sleep. 

[Eric Loh]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

That's what I thought. 

 

Poor, poor lefty. 

Here’s looking at next 4 years of economic disaster and decline of global leadership under Trump. A toast to your winning team and the hiring of the best people 

[EveryG]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So still no evidence then? 

It's easy to see that you are not actually interested in evidence, but the evidence was already presented at a trial, seen by a jury, and Trump lost. There is no point in relitigating a jury trial here because you are not interested in arriving at the facts, as the jury was instructed to do. That's why he's been ordered to pay $5 million for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll. Trump's defense was proven completely false - laughably so.

  

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

You sound like a child denying obvious facts such as Trump cannot claim to have never met E Jean Carroll (which is what Trump actually claimed) when a picture shows them together. 

 

Some people here do not comprehend rules of evidence and how that relates to findings of fact, much like they don't understand how statistics and probabilities relate to polls. 

[Captain Flack]

A number of troll posts have been removed.

 

@Yellowtail if you can’t post without using the same name calling statement against everyone you disagree with, I will give you a time out to stop your trolling.