Trump's Sex Crime Cabinet

[EveryG]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

He was not found guilty of rape,  you can scream it until you are blue in the face...  actually I expect you already are.

And you can scream this until you are blue in the face, I never said he was. 

 

This is a literal strawman...oh wait, logical fallacies are like the MAGA SOP. 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, EveryG said:

Again, your reading comprehension shocks me over and over. I was not accusing YOU of denying the fact of his convictions, but saying MAGAs will deny all of the evidence contained in those convictions. Same for all of the other examples. It's hard to tell if you are incapable or if you mind is just so twisted by ideology that you cannot read. Either way, no evidence will convince you that Trump committed sexual assault, that he committed criminal fraud, and that he committed fraud. 

So still no evidence then? 

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, EveryG said:

Wrong. There was that picture of them together shown at the trial. You. Are. A. Clown.

 

 

Ironically, as Trump was lying saying that he never met her during his deposition, Carroll's lawyer showed him this picture. When asked who that woman was, he said it was Marla Maples. So Trump blew his entire defense up because they proved he did know her and that he would have been attracted to her at least in the same manner he was his own wife. The jury saw the taped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

 

Your reading comprehension skills seems to be lacking. I was asking for evidence of a sexual assault. Still nothing. Oops.

 

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

 

[Eric Loh]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Your reading comprehension skills seems to be lacking. I was asking for evidence of a sexual assault. Still nothing. Oops.

 

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

 

Evidently you didn’t read the transcript. Jury convicted him because he was lying. That’s perjury or tampering with evidence .
 

The jury saw thetaped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Evidently you didn’t read the transcript. Jury convicted him because he was lying. That’s perjury or tampering with evidence .
 

The jury saw thetaped deposition of Trump getting caught lying. 

What did he lie about? 

[Eric Loh]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

What did he lie about? 

Nothing. Go back to sleep. 

[Eric Loh]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

That's what I thought. 

 

Poor, poor lefty. 

Here’s looking at next 4 years of economic disaster and decline of global leadership under Trump. A toast to your winning team and the hiring of the best people 

[EveryG]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So still no evidence then? 

It's easy to see that you are not actually interested in evidence, but the evidence was already presented at a trial, seen by a jury, and Trump lost. There is no point in relitigating a jury trial here because you are not interested in arriving at the facts, as the jury was instructed to do. That's why he's been ordered to pay $5 million for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll. Trump's defense was proven completely false - laughably so.

  

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How does Trump being in a picture with someone prove he knows them? Oops. 

 

You sound like a child denying obvious facts such as Trump cannot claim to have never met E Jean Carroll (which is what Trump actually claimed) when a picture shows them together. 

 

Some people here do not comprehend rules of evidence and how that relates to findings of fact, much like they don't understand how statistics and probabilities relate to polls. 

[Captain Flack]

A number of troll posts have been removed.

 

@Yellowtail if you can’t post without using the same name calling statement against everyone you disagree with, I will give you a time out to stop your trolling.

[EveryG]

Quote

In a draft of a 42-page report reviewed by Axios, the committee says it found "substantial evidence" that Gaetz "regularly" paid for sex between 2017 and 2020; had sex with a 17-year-old in 2017; and used cocaine and ecstasy on "multiple occasions" between 2017 and 2019.

• The report also alleges that Gaetz accepted improper gifts, misused official resources and lied to the State Department to help a sexual partner obtain a passport, and obstructed the committee's investigation.
• The findings, it says, are based on a review of nearly 14,000 documents and communications with more than two dozen witnesses.

At least the creepo cokehead is out of congress and where he belongs...one of Trump's BS media/ propaganda machines 

Maybe he and Don Jr can regularly cut lines together now 

 

[bendejo]

Just follow the pattern, usually his denials are:

1) I don't know anything about it, this is the first I heard

2) it's not true

3) some sort of justification, which usually involves contradicting #2

4) this is where he usually trips over his own lies, you know he's getting exhausted when he says "ask ______" (one of his disciples)

Possibly all four are spoken within a few minutes. 

The press drives the narrative from here, the responses are usually some sort of jumble of the above four.

Fox usually comes to the rescue with their own fictional rationalizing.  Or they completely ignore it.  Sometimes this is entertaining, e.g. during the 1/6 investigation Fox was running "fire department rescues cat from tree" stories.*

 

In the pre-internet days US television news was notorious for filling up news reports with stuff like this, these days it is inane chatter by the on-screen personalities ("Can you believe how good these cookies are?").

 

[thaibeachlovers]

On 12/16/2024 at 11:07 PM, EveryG said:

You sound like a child denying obvious facts such as Trump cannot claim to have never met E Jean Carroll (which is what Trump actually claimed) when a picture shows them together. 

I'm sure I met a lot of people in my life that I don't remember meeting.

Seems that some people on here think Trump should have a photographic memory.

Anyway, just because he met her does not mean he is guilty as charged. Need more than a photo from long ago to prove that.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 12/16/2024 at 7:06 PM, EveryG said:

This is a literal strawman...oh wait, logical fallacies are like the MAGA SOP. 

Just as it is anti Trumpers SOP to keep throwing mud in the hope that some will stick.

It doesn't have to be true, just keep throwing it.