Jump to content

Israel’s Bold Action Against Syria’s Chemical Arsenal Benefits the World


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Finally after years and years Israel has done something beneficial and constructive. Hallelujah, this is a biblical event. 

 

Not forgetting when they destroyed Iraq's Nuclear making facilities . Also killing that terrorists who murdered numerous Americans in the bomb attack  , Did the  USA pay Israel that ranson money yet ?

   What was it ? $15 million price on his head ?

  • Like 1
Posted

Israel also benefits the world's infidels with its dramatic fight against Hamas and Hezbollah as infidels will be an eventual

target.  The ungratefulness shown is sickening and shows the mentality of masses.  The muslims want Aljazeera to show the destruction by refusing to release the hostages to get your pity.  They don't care about their own people as there are almost 2 billion of them.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, black tabby12345 said:

 

As well as blowing up Iran's missile/nuke  installation in recent months.

 

Has it blown up any Nuclear installations?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Oh gawd, the tired old, "I am a Jew." So what? A Jew can still be anti semitic even those that have to also or perhaps more so emphasize all the Jewish friends he has.

 

When a Jewish person expresses anti-Jewish ideas, is that antisemitism? It might sound odd, but yes. From the Middle Ages until the present day, there are plenty of examples of Jewish people perpetuating antisemitism, despite being Jews themselves. Sometimes it is what scholars call “internalized racism,”

https://unpacked.education/video/can-jews-be-antisemitic/

 

Indeed Brian; sounds like the other one on here who claims to have a Rabbi as a best friend.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

People seem to have trouble differentiating between Israelis and Jews. One is a state, the other a religion. You can like one and not the other.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I find the Israeli government atrocious and very racist. Israel cannot expect the violence to stop, until they develop a reasonable and humane approach. 

 

 

Well, maybe you could enlighten us all as to what would be a “reasonable and humane approach” to October 7 2023, which saw the most inhumane and barbaric atrocities the world has witnessed in modern history.

 

And then maybe you can enlighten us all as to what would be a “reasonable and humane approach” from Israel to dealing with being both continually threatened, and attacked, by Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, Shia terrorists in Iraq, terrorist militia groups in Syria, Palestinian terrorists in the West Bank, and Iran, who as recently as Oct 24, fired more than 180 hypersonic and ballistic missiles indiscriminately at Israeli citizens.

 

So come on, tell us all how Israel should respond with a “reasonable and humane approach” to the existential threats to their very existence that they face on 7 different fronts; all of them from either terrorist organisations or a terrorist state.

 

You, claiming to be a Jew, is an appalling insult to all Jews in the world, and an affront to the intelligence of posters on this forum.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, black tabby12345 said:

Read your links!

They  contain words/phrases like "may have hit", "if confirmed", "White House officials privately warned Iran in direct conversations about the suspicious research activities", "former nuclear weapons test building".  There is no definitive proven source to state that Israel, or anyone else, "has blown up nuclear installations" that were currently active at the time of the so called attacks!

  • Confused 1
Posted

@spidermike007 criticized Israel indirectly by writing “finally Israel has done something beneficial …” and is accused immediately as being ungrateful, disgraceful, bigoted and anti-Semitic and even when he informs us, that he actually is a Jew and his comment was not meant to be anti-Semitic but only to criticize the actual government of Israel, he still is ridiculed and confronted with a “proof” that Jews can be anti-Semitic too.

 

 I'm not interested in partaking in this discussion, but what happened to “what makes you think that Israel hasn't been doing anything beneficial in the last years?” or “can you prove this statement?” or even prove him wrong by giving counterexamples?

 

Is that all what is left from respectful discussions where we would use arguments based on facts and proof and at the end of the day maybe even agree and if not, at least understand the position of our opponents?

 

Anti-Semitism is rightfully criticized but if you nip any discussion about or criticism of Israel in the bud by screaming “racist” or ”anti-Semite” you are actually creating anti-Semitism which makes you part of the problem.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Somjot said:

@spidermike007 criticized Israel indirectly by writing “finally Israel has done something beneficial …” and is accused immediately as being ungrateful, disgraceful, bigoted and anti-Semitic and even when he informs us, that he actually is a Jew and his comment was not meant to be anti-Semitic but only to criticize the actual government of Israel, he still is ridiculed and confronted with a “proof” that Jews can be anti-Semitic too.

 

 I'm not interested in partaking in this discussion, but what happened to “what makes you think that Israel hasn't been doing anything beneficial in the last years?” or “can you prove this statement?” or even prove him wrong by giving counterexamples?

 

Is that all what is left from respectful discussions where we would use arguments based on facts and proof and at the end of the day maybe even agree and if not, at least understand the position of our opponents?

 

Anti-Semitism is rightfully criticized but if you nip any discussion about or criticism of Israel in the bud by screaming “racist” or ”anti-Semite” you are actually creating anti-Semitism which makes you part of the problem.

 

 

   His points were addressed in various other posts and Anti semitism wasn't mentioned .

   Why don't you reply to the posts that didn't mention Anti semitism ?

SM did suggest that wiping our two terrorist organisations . Hamas and Hezbollah and severely weakening Iran's military wasnt beneficial. 

   

Posted
20 minutes ago, Somjot said:

@spidermike007 criticized Israel indirectly by writing “finally Israel has done something beneficial …” and is accused immediately as being ungrateful, disgraceful, bigoted and anti-Semitic and even when he informs us, that he actually is a Jew and his comment was not meant to be anti-Semitic but only to criticize the actual government of Israel, he still is ridiculed and confronted with a “proof” that Jews can be anti-Semitic too.

 

 I'm not interested in partaking in this discussion, but what happened to “what makes you think that Israel hasn't been doing anything beneficial in the last years?” or “can you prove this statement?” or even prove him wrong by giving counterexamples?

 

Is that all what is left from respectful discussions where we would use arguments based on facts and proof and at the end of the day maybe even agree and if not, at least understand the position of our opponents?

 

Anti-Semitism is rightfully criticized but if you nip any discussion about or criticism of Israel in the bud by screaming “racist” or ”anti-Semite” you are actually creating anti-Semitism which makes you part of the problem.

 

I'm not interested in partaking in this discussion, but what happened to “what makes you think that Israel hasn't been doing anything beneficial in the last years?” or “can you prove this statement?” or even prove him wrong by giving counterexamples?

 

So you're interested in having a say but not to be challenged on your say if other members disagree. Sounds like the recent Oxford Uni debate on Israel. You should note that if a member wants to make a point of discussing what his religion is and how many friends he has of the same religion, he then invites others to point out a few facts. Something it sounds like you also disagree with.

 

Anything to add on the actual topic?

Israel’s Bold Action Against Syria’s Chemical Arsenal Benefits the World

 

Thought not

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

They have also virtually destroyed the Syrian Air Defence Missile installations, and shattered their air force.

 

In an unrelated development, half a dozen Druze Arab villages on the Syrian part of the Golan Heights have voted to ask Israel to annex them rather than take their chances with the likely Islamic regime in Syria. I don't expect Israel will annex the territory, ( golly, could you imagine the frothing at various mouths of they did!) but they may well welcome the people.

Posted
15 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Finally after years and years Israel has done something beneficial and constructive. Hallelujah, this is a biblical event. 

From the day of its formation and declaration of independence in 1948,  Israel has had a "beneficial and constructive" function of the highest order as the homeland  and haven of last resort for the world's Jews.  

 

Here's another "beneficial and constructive effect:

 

6 Syrian Druze Villages Asking to Be Annexed by Israel

 

"During a council meeting of residents of six Druze villages in southern Syria held overnight Friday, it was decided that the jihadist Syrian rebels should be prevented from reaching the Druze area and suggested annexing their villages to the Israeli Golan Heights."

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/druze/6-syrian-druze-villages-asking-to-be-annexed-by-israel/2024/12/13/

 

The Druze villagers apparently consider Israeli Jews to be a lesser evil compared with Islamists.

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

From the day of its formation and declaration of independence in 1948,  Israel has had a "beneficial and constructive" function of the highest order as the homeland  and haven of last resort for the world's Jews.  

 

Here's another "beneficial and constructive effect:

 

6 Syrian Druze Villages Asking to Be Annexed by Israel

 

"During a council meeting of residents of six Druze villages in southern Syria held overnight Friday, it was decided that the jihadist Syrian rebels should be prevented from reaching the Druze area and suggested annexing their villages to the Israeli Golan Heights."

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/druze/6-syrian-druze-villages-asking-to-be-annexed-by-israel/2024/12/13/

 

The Druze villagers apparently consider Israeli Jews to be a lesser evil compared with Islamists.

 

 

  Why would the Druze want to go and live in an oppressive apartheid genocidal murderous baby killing colonialist state , why are they asking to be occupied by Israel ?

    :) 

  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 23

      Israel’s Bold Action Against Syria’s Chemical Arsenal Benefits the World

    2. 43

      Heart Check -

    3. 0

      Trump Mulls Action Against Iran’s Nuclear Program

    4. 0

      GB News Criticized for Extensive Focus on Muslims Amid Controversy Over Reporting

    5. 0

      Recession Fears, Labour dealt blow as UK economy shrinks

    6. 0

      Barron Trump: The Rising Star Winning Hearts at NYU

    7. 0

      Sean "Diddy" Combs Faces Allegations of Drugging and Raping Three Men

    8. 0

      Transgender Fencer Sparks Controversy with Prestigious Win on Women’s Team

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...