Jump to content

Thaksin Announces New Anti-Drug Task Force Led by PM Paetongtarn


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Tropicalevo said:

Thaksin is flavour of the month.

He's like marmite to me.

 

I hate marmite. 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, webfact said:

This was announced by former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra during a Pheu Thai Party meeting, which took place on a journey to Hua Hin in Prachuap Khiri Khan. The seminar aimed to bolster the party's strategies and enhance leadership effectiveness

Stay out of politics he was told?

What more proof does the judiciary need?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, webfact said:

who will work alongside police and provincial entities to intensify drug suppression.

This vague language is hard to understand.  Are they trying to arrest speed freaks?  Biker gangs?  Crack down on weed shops?  Mushroom pizza?  I don't really understand what this is all supposed to be about.  But I understand TIT!   

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BarBoy said:

I wish these bleedin' shins would give it a rest with all this populist crap.

 

same old record that's been playing for years.

 

not a single thai I know gives a flying frig about the so called 'drug problem'. It just doesn't affect them.

 

As long as they're almost free.

Posted
4 hours ago, webfact said:

to combat Thailand's continuing drug challenges,

 

4 hours ago, webfact said:

This was announced by former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra

 

Back to extrajudicial killings in the border areas of Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai Provinces with Burma?

Ya ba "mules' beware! Personally, I support such action. 

No further comment from me.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Briggsy said:

Roll out the Border Police again to eliminate anybody who is deemed to be involved in drugs. No accountability, no justice. Just extrajudicial executions decided by those who currently hold power.

It will be a drug war between police and and Army mules 

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

You're gonna need more prisons boss.

 

No problems, we'll take  it from the taxes,  not from the filthy rich of course

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, redwood1 said:

How Tony can even have the nerve to be apart of this after the 100s of criminal  judicial killings he ordered when he was PM is incomprehensible.....He should have spent time in jail over what happened...

 

Just look at that big stupid grin in the photo......... Folks he is laughing because he knows he above the law.....

 

I think not, remember  when he fled the country for 17 years (his former wife still at large)

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bagwain said:

I thought he had a court order to stay out of politics?

 

Just coaching from the sidelines. NOT

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Deerculler said:

Is Thaskin the Prime Minister or his daughter?

What would you think? 😉

  • Agree 1
Posted

Oh, the insanity of those that would repeat the same action over and over, each time expecting a different result. Drugs won the war on drugs, decades ago.

 

Here I go again, banging the same old drum; education and mental health care have been proven to be the best measures to undertake in reducing drug harm. The Portugese experiment of many, many years now stands as proof of this. No well informed, mentally healthy person will knowingly cause themselves harm, period. Those that inflict drug harm on themselves do so either through ignorance or are driven to numb the pain of well defined, mostly treatable mental health issues. 

 

But no, those that base their policy making on twisted psudeo-moralistic values and a desire to appear 'tough' instead of using reason, logic and science are in charge. They will cause yet more harm by criminalising otherwise law abiding drug users and punish instead of offering help to drug abusers / addicts. Families will be broken up. Vast sums of money will continue to be funneled into the hands of powerful criminal enterprieses. A climate that encourages extra-judicial penalties and even killings will be engendered. Drug harm and addiction rates will continue to rise as they always do, regardless of how many 'assertive drug policies' have been put in place.

 

Perhaps a better approach would be to investigate the reasons why mental health issues are increasiing year on year? I strongly suspect this would yield far greater results in the 'fight' against drug harm and addiction.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

I thought one of the stipulations was he wasn’t supposed to be getting involved in politics well he’s announcing the policy I think that he is complete control of the party in TIT

  • Like 1
Posted

I’m not a drug dealer or runner so it doesn’t really affect me, but if you do just watch your back. No I don’t have any sympathy for drug dealers.

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, NanLaew said:

 

There's no "court order". He has stated that he isn't involved and everyone, including the opposition, are rolling with it.

Add to that that he is not a legal member of PTP and accordiyto the law can't be involved.  He just keeps stepping over the line daring them to hit him

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Thaksin reminding me why I detested him so much 1st time round, to the point where i mistakenly cheered a coup d'etat. The 1st war on drugs which as i remember saw police gunning down personal enemies and love rivals in the thousands. Red pills went from 30b to 1,000b then back down to 10b. Total waste of time, humans will never stop wanting a brief escape from reality. What a horrible pos

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

As soon as Yingluck is back and Taksin has been milked a bit more the military can proceed with the next coup and get this national embarrassment off the front pages of newspapers.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BarBoy said:

It just doesn't affect them.

Of course you are right. When a Mum or Dad or Grandparent is shot or stabbed by a family member who needs money for Yabba etc, it doesn't affect them one bit. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, KannikaP said:

Of course you are right. When a Mum or Dad or Grandparent is shot or stabbed by a family member who needs money for Yabba etc, it doesn't affect them one bit. 

how often does that happen?

 

enough to waste more public funds and potentially endanger innocent lives in a bloody nationwide crackdown??

 

proportion is key, and that would be totally over the top, as witnessed in 2003.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BarBoy said:

how often does that happen?

 

enough to waste more public funds and potentially endanger innocent lives in a bloody nationwide crackdown??

 

proportion is key, and that would be totally over the top, as witnessed in 2003.

It does happen, and ONE time is too often. Yabba = Jail. Selling Yabba, or killing to buy it = the Chop, in my book anyway.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...