Jump to content

Srinagarind Hospital overwhelmed by 830% rise in cancer patients


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, UWEB said:

The numbers raised in a period of three years since the program was started and not within some days. Before people were restricted to the Hospital where they are registered, under the program started in 2021 they can use any Hospital. And off course they flog to the most specialized ones.

No.  People aren’t restricted to the hospital where they are registered if their hospital does not offer what is needed.  Referrals can be made.  You should educate yourself on how the healthcare here works.

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 6:06 PM, Carsten07 said:

Cancers and excess mortality is on the rise, steeply, in most countries that did what in 2021?!

 

There is an elephant in the room.

 

is the elephant in the room the idiot anti-vaxxer? And source for your claim? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 10:47 AM, phetphet said:

The cancer cases must already have been there. The program has just brought them to the fore.

 

I wonder what the main causes are here in Thailand. Smoking? Excessive use of chemicals in farming? Pollution? Additives in food? Deep frying everything?

A lack of amulets as well maybe?

Posted

I'm thankful that the Cult of the Wormheads has come here to solve this mystery. I have no doubt that the next volcanic eruption or solar eclipse will also be attributable to "The Jab". I'm a little surprised how many expat PhD biochemists have settled in Thailand and joined AN. We're just lucky, I guess.

 

I'm one of those Luddites who do not believe that correlation equals causation, nor do I believe everything on the internet is Gospel truth. That's just the natural skeptic in me. I see that data and consider things like:

 

---Awareness among the area population that that particular hospital has developed a comprehensive cancer treatment program and broadcast it, so folks turn toward it for treatment ?

 

---The prevalence of the area consumption of Koi Pla, which has been linked to liver cancer ?

 

---Rising levels of pollution countrywide, but cancer patients not congregating at one specific hospital in other areas ?

 

---Some particular cancer causing substance in some factory or farms in that area ?

 

---Better reporting and data keeping re cancer numbers ?

 

---Better detection methods ?

 

---Tattoos ?

 

---An alien bio weapon being tested first in Khon Kaen ? /sarc

 

The skeptic in me also questions the credibility of a proponent of odd conspiracies who takes exception to FDA-approved vaccines, but is perfectly comfortable injecting himself with heroin sourced from rural Myanmar or Afghanistan.

 

 

Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 5:47 AM, phetphet said:

The cancer cases must already have been there. The program has just brought them to the fore.

 

I wonder what the main causes are here in Thailand. Smoking? Excessive use of chemicals in farming? Pollution? Additives in food? Deep frying everything?

The increase is from people coming from other areas of Thailand for treatment.  Before they had no choice but to get care at the designated hospital, now they can go where they want, which people will go to the place with the best reputation.  

Posted
15 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

 

... and as usual on this Forum only 1 poster dared hinting to the elephant's name. 

Let's not beat around the bush, it's Jabby, also known as the '100% safe and effective' Protector of your Health...

 

And as usual the top covid conspiracy adherent shows up.

I read your link yesterday.

 

I got the tubo cancer from the clot shot says one, well sir I heard my sister's nephew got the turbo leukemia, cuz it done altered his DNA don't ya know.

 

So many experts 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, zepplin said:

Guess you forgot the stupid “health” minister Anutin promoting vaccines…

This is the same around the world with “ turbo” cancers, and doctors have never seen anything like it! Meanwhile stupid Biden pardons Phizer ect from prosecution until 2029 ,.. the death ratio for kids was 30:1 due to the supposedly  safe vaccines, 30 died to save 1 ! 

30 kids died to save 1?? Where do you get this?

that would mean that out of 100,000 kids only about 3,400 would live.  

 

There is no such thing as turbo cancer, there are some aggressive cancers (lung, Prostate). 

Here are some quotes from doctors

 

John Schiller, an NIH researcher who pioneered research in cancer-causing viruses, said that pathogens known to cause cancer can remain in the body long-term. However, respiratory viruses, such as COVID or influenza, are not believed to cause cancer and typically do not linger in the body.

"You can never say never, but that sort of … virus does not suggest being implicated in cancers," Schiller said.

 

Xuesong Han, scientific director of health services research at the American Cancer Society, said that an increase in late-stage cancers during the pandemic was likely due to patient delaying or skipping care — either for COVID-19 concerns or economic reasons. Cultural factors, language barriers, and discrimination may have also played a role.

However, Han also acknowledged that the biological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could be affecting cancer risk.

 

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2024/06/12/covid-cancer

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/01/09/cdc-hasnt-linked-covid-19-vaccine-to-cancer-surge-fact-check/72085906007/

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/still-no-evidence-covid-19-vaccination-increases-cancer-risk-despite-posts/

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Airalee said:

Ok….explain the 800%+ rise now.   Has there been an 800% increase in PET scan machines? 
 

I didn’t think so.
 

Your quoted figures show a rise of less than 200% from 1997 until 2017.  

 

Don’t forget to get your recommended Covid booster. 😘 

 

the 8-fold rise could be due to a number of factors.

 

a. different screening techniques

b. many more people getting screened

 

What you really need to look at is mortality rate.

And NOT the rate at which people are being diagnosed and treated.

So, this 800-percent figure is meaningless.

Not enough information to make any sense out of it.

 

Also, actual numbers need to be reported, and not just a percentage.

 

If the number goes from one diagnosed patient to 8 patients per year, then its an 800 percent rise.

 

This is garbage reporting, because the necessary info to make sense of it is not been included.

 

Has the hospital changed its policies, for example, to attract more cancer patients?  This is unknown....etc....

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

the 8-fold rise could be due to a number of factors.

 

a. different screening techniques

b. many more people getting screened

 

What you really need to look at is mortality rate.

And NOT the rate at which people are being diagnosed and treated.

So, this 800-percent figure is meaningless.

Not enough information to make any sense out of it.

 

Also, actual numbers need to be reported, and not just a percentage.

 

If the number goes from one diagnosed patient to 8 patients per year, then its an 800 percent rise.

 

This is garbage reporting, because the necessary info to make sense of it is not been included.

 

Has the hospital changed its policies, for example, to attract more cancer patients?  This is unknown....etc....

 

 

Ummmm….the quoted material you gave me did give numbers so your claim of going from one patient to eight is quite disingenuous.

 

Carry on.  Nothing to see here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member




×
×
  • Create New...