COVID Vaccines Could INTEGRATE with Human DNA: Yale Research

[DD86]

On 12/21/2024 at 8:19 AM, gargamon said:

Where's the peer reviewed paper? This may as well be by some idiot on YouTube or TikTok.

Ok, get your next shot asap please. Deadly shot don't only come from guns.

[DD86]

On 12/21/2024 at 10:27 AM, gargamon said:

Post as many unreviewed papers as you like. All garbage until the feedback comes back and it's actually published in a reputable journal.

Never mind, go get your next shot asap please. Deadly shots don't only come from guns. Waiting for a reputable journal as if those excist these days. MA.

[DD86]

On 12/21/2024 at 11:27 PM, farang51 said:

I am not so nervous about Covid spike protein found after two years as I don't know if that is good or bad. But what about the GPS tracker, is that still in the blood after two years?

Untill you will soon die.

[Purdey]

8 hours ago, impulse said:

 

The question is, who's paying them to do all that work, and how can the be assured they'll get hired to do it again?

 

Or, more to the point, what would guarantee that they don't get the next contract?

I think you will  find that scientists do peer reviews because they are interested to know more. If they are studying that area of science it is useful to add to their knowledge 

[rumak]

On 12/21/2024 at 8:39 AM, Red Phoenix said:

But no worries I will update this thread when the results are published...

 

The latest ......PEER REVIEWED !

 

Last month, a quiet but blockbuster study was published in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine titled, “Pharmaceutical product recall and educated hesitancy towards new drugs and novel vaccines."   The peer-reviewed study savaged the covid shots.

 

Red Phoenix ,  if unable to locate elsewhere...... a long summation today on Jeff Childers Coffee & Covid  on Substack .     ( monday, dec 23)

[gargamon]

14 hours ago, DD86 said:

Never mind, go get your next shot asap please. Deadly shots don't only come from guns. Waiting for a reputable journal as if those excist these days. MA.

Already had all my shots. No problems. Reputable journals exist. It's only the stupid half of the population that believes their YouTube/TikTok/Infowars etc. nonsense is actually accurate. Kids in your country getting measles yet? Polio too very soon it looks like also.

[Tippaporn]

On 12/23/2024 at 8:33 AM, Hawaiian said:

On 12/23/2024 at 7:47 AM, Tippaporn said:

 

If that's all you've got for an argument then you've failed.  Badly.  You must have missed the memo.  Labeling sources as "conspiracy theorists" doesn't work anymore.  The con that's been perpetrated has been exposed to an extent that makes it undeniable.  Throwing out the term "conspiracy theory" is part of the con.

 

Instead, why don't you argue against the facts the article puts forth.  That Pfizer, from their own documentation, hid fatality data from regulators.  Again, that is a fact that comes from Pfizer's own documentation.  Give me your best argument as to what makes that fake news.  I doubt you'll come up with one.  The truth hurts too much.

I did not claim the article to be fake news. I question the accuracy of the article. 

 

Sorry, not buying your backpedaling, Hawaiian.  Here's what you wrote:

 

On 12/23/2024 at 7:18 AM, Hawaiian said:

On 12/22/2024 at 7:33 PM, rattlesnake said:

A friendly reminder from 2023, since we are now allowed to say it:

 

Pfizer Hid Almost 80% Of Covid Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators

 

According to an analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.

 

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/pfizer-hid-almost-80-of-covid-vaccine-trial-deaths-from-regulators/

Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news.

 

You didn't question the article.  You smeared the source, People's Voice.  No mention of the article or it's content whatsoever.  Now your story changes.

 

On 12/23/2024 at 8:33 AM, Hawaiian said:

This is what I found.

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.9UC4LE

 

I'll lay aside the entire issue of fact  checkers, which is a whole topic unto itself.  But I will analyse the article's "debunking" . . . to an extent.

 

"The document cited in the articles contains nothing to indicate the vaccine was linked to deaths."

 

I dunno about you but I tire of articles which point to documents without ever reproducing those documents in the article or providing links to said documents.  To be fair, I'll likewise fault People's Voice.  I prefer to read any document myself rather than assume, or take on pure faith, a third party's interpretation is correct.

 

". . . Pfizer spokeswoman Dervila Keane told AFP."

"FDA spokeswoman Alison Hunt told AFP . . ."

 

Now Pfizer is accused of alleged criminality.  The FDA is similarly suspect as a governmental agency that has become corrupted to the degree that they can no longer be unquestioningly trusted.  What I find simply astounding is that the "fact checker" "debunked" the claim of Pfizer hiding data by asking only both Pfizer and the FDA for their side of the story.  For one, how can anyone legitimately take the word of either entity at face value without fact checking their stories?  This is what you appear to be doing.

 

For another, if a fact checker were to do honest and unbiased work then they would also include the other side of the story.  But they don't.  And the why is perhaps a question you've never asked yourself but a whole lot of other people ask.  Only so that they don't get caught with their pants around their ankles sometime later.

 

Apparently, according to you, if one doesn't accept the Pfizer and FDA explanations as gospel truth and questions it then that mere innocent, though exceedingly prudent, act of questioning is what makes them a conspiracy theorist.  Which is what you accuse People's Voice of engaging in.  Again, in your own words:

 

"Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news."

 

My conclusion is that your view here is not at all balanced.  In fact, it appears to be skewed towards a particular bias.  And unbalanced and biased views are rarely representative of any real truth.  I suggest you question more and investigate all sides of an issue before drawing gospel truth conclusions.  Just trying to help you avoid any future where you get caught with your drawers around your ankles and then have to perform endless mea culpas in public.

 

[Tippaporn]

On 12/23/2024 at 8:44 AM, dinsdale said:

Your link from 2021 has no connection to the article. From your linked article.

"But the pharmaceutical giant says the document does not indicate the fatalities are linked to vaccination, and it concludes the shots are safe -- a finding supported by US health authorities as well as clinical research."

We now know the vaccines aren't safe and the article you linked simply pushes the narrative from late 2021.

 

Thanks, dinsdale.  I didn't even bother checking the date of the linked article and incorrectly assumed it was current.

 

Here's a link to the crowd sourced analysis of the court ordered Pfizer documents for anyone's reference.  This is the only comprehensive analysis of those documents being performed that I am aware of.  One thing is certain.

 

https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-and-moderna-reports/

 

The MSM hasn't bothered doing any investigations into those documents.  Gee, I wonder why?

 

 

[Tippaporn]

On 12/23/2024 at 10:36 AM, Purdey said:

On 12/22/2024 at 7:21 PM, Tippaporn said:

 

At least that's how it's supposed to work.  It's up to you to find out whether or not it really works as advertised and not simply assume that it's a perfect world.  Do your own homework and you might end up feeling scandalized.

Good idea if you're a qualified scientist. Hard to do your homework if you just have google to rely on. 

 

Correction:  Impossible to "do your homework if you just have google to rely on."  Google's search engine ensures that you are unable to access opposing information.

 

You don't necessarily need to be a qualified scientist to understand what's true and what's false in the world of science.  That's an engineered fallacy that works to force people's reliance for the truth on experts and cancels people's ability to know the truth using their own resourcefulness.  Which, BTW, is quite vast.

[Hawaiian]

36 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

 

Thanks, dinsdale.  I didn't even bother checking the date of the linked article and incorrectly assumed it was current.

 

Here's a link to the crowd sourced analysis of the court ordered Pfizer documents for anyone's reference.  This is the only comprehensive analysis of those documents being performed that I am aware of.  One thing is certain.

 

https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-and-moderna-reports/

 

The MSM hasn't bothered doing any investigations into those documents.  Gee, I wonder why?

 

 

 

 

55 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

 

Sorry, not buying your backpedaling, Hawaiian.  Here's what you wrote:

 

 

You didn't question the article.  You smeared the source, People's Voice.  No mention of the article or it's content whatsoever.  Now your story changes.

 

 

I'll lay aside the entire issue of fact  checkers, which is a whole topic unto itself.  But I will analyse the article's "debunking" . . . to an extent.

 

"The document cited in the articles contains nothing to indicate the vaccine was linked to deaths."

 

I dunno about you but I tire of articles which point to documents without ever reproducing those documents in the article or providing links to said documents.  To be fair, I'll likewise fault People's Voice.  I prefer to read any document myself rather than assume, or take on pure faith, a third party's interpretation is correct.

 

". . . Pfizer spokeswoman Dervila Keane told AFP."

"FDA spokeswoman Alison Hunt told AFP . . ."

 

Now Pfizer is accused of alleged criminality.  The FDA is similarly suspect as a governmental agency that has become corrupted to the degree that they can no longer be unquestioningly trusted.  What I find simply astounding is that the "fact checker" "debunked" the claim of Pfizer hiding data by asking only both Pfizer and the FDA for their side of the story.  For one, how can anyone legitimately take the word of either entity at face value without fact checking their stories?  This is what you appear to be doing.

 

For another, if a fact checker were to do honest and unbiased work then they would also include the other side of the story.  But they don't.  And the why is perhaps a question you've never asked yourself but a whole lot of other people ask.  Only so that they don't get caught with their pants around their ankles sometime later.

 

Apparently, according to you, if one doesn't accept the Pfizer and FDA explanations as gospel truth and questions it then that mere innocent, though exceedingly prudent, act of questioning is what makes them a conspiracy theorist.  Which is what you accuse People's Voice of engaging in.  Again, in your own words:

 

"Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news."

 

My conclusion is that your view here is not at all balanced.  In fact, it appears to be skewed towards a particular bias.  And unbalanced and biased views are rarely representative of any real truth.  I suggest you question more and investigate all sides of an issue before drawing gospel truth conclusions.  Just trying to help you avoid any future where you get caught with your drawers around your ankles and then have to perform endless mea culpas in public.

 

Save your sermon for the pulpit.  If repeating what factcheck.apr has to say about Peoples Voice is smearing then according to you I am guilty.

[frank83628]

On 12/21/2024 at 8:36 AM, ChaiyaTH said:

The oldies here all took 3-4 booster shots of this crap so they will defend it to be good stuff until there is 100 research showing how bad and useless the shots were. It's like the naked emperor, it was already during covid.

 

But hey no worries, all these turbo cancers, the excess of deaths at older age groups with 20-30% increases etc all mean absolute nothing and are just a coincidence. Nothing to see here move on, until it's you...

And turbo caners have just been accepted as a thing without any questions.

Nothing to see here

[Tippaporn]

On 12/23/2024 at 10:37 AM, Purdey said:

On 12/22/2024 at 8:03 PM, GreasyFingers said:

So you believe that mRNA REALLY was a vaccine?

So I am not stupid enough to think I know more than people who have spent 20 years studying the subject. 😁

 

No one has been studying the CDC redefining "vaccine" for 20 years.  Do you know enough to understand the question GF asked you?  Do you believe the Covid "vaccines" are vaccines or mrRNA gene editing therapies?

 

BREAKING: Proof CDC Changed Definition of ‘Vaccine’ Because Prior Definition Allowed People “To Claim the COVID-19 Vaccine is Not a Vaccine”

 

Here's the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021:

Vaccine-- “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

Here is the new definition:

Vaccine-- “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/breaking-proof-cdc-changed-definition-vaccine-prior-definition-allowed-people-claim-covid-19-vaccine-not-vaccine/

 

Emails Reveal CDC Changed Definition of “Vaccine” and “Vaccination” Because Their Experimental COVID Shots Didn’t Work as Advertised

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/emails-reveal-cdc-changed-definition-vaccine-vaccination-experimental-covid-shots-didnt-work/

 

9th Circuit Court of Appeals Acknowledges Plaintiffs’ Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Jab is NOT a Vaccine, But a Therapeutic

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-covid/

 

Dr. Stefan Oelrich, President of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, admits MNRA Vaccines ARE Gene Therapy

 

 

[Tippaporn]

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

Save your sermon for the pulpit.  If repeating what factcheck.apr has to say about Peoples Voice is smearing then according to you I am guilty.

 

 But it's not the case of you merely repeating what factcheck.apr has to say about People's Voice.  Once again you're trying to change the story so that you can avoid conceding the point.

  

On 12/23/2024 at 7:18 AM, Hawaiian said:

Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news.

 

Your words.  Your statement of "fact."  Your smear.  The meaning of those words being wholly unambiguous.  Just own up.  That's all I'm asking of you.

[Hawaiian]

10 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

 

 But it's not the case of you merely repeating what factcheck.apr has to say about People's Voice.  Once again you're trying to change the story so that you can avoid conceding the point.

  

 

Your words.  Your statement of fact.  Your smear.  The meaning of those words being wholly unambiguous.  Just own up.  That's all I'm asking of you.

You can interpret it any way you want.

[Tippaporn]

Just now, Hawaiian said:

You can interpret it any way you want.

 

And you can dissemble any way you want.  It's okay.

[GreasyFingers]

3 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Correction:  Impossible to "do your homework if you just have google to rely on."  Google's search engine ensures that you are unable to access opposing information.

Are these people still using Google for searches? The only time you use it is for confirmation bias.

[Tippaporn]

On 12/23/2024 at 3:56 PM, Globalres said:

I guess we haven’t heard yet about the outcome of this info.

 

Au contraire.  The released documents were crowd sourced due to their immense volume.  Lots of damning facts.  The reports can be found here:

 

https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-and-moderna-reports/

[Tippaporn]

18 hours ago, GreasyFingers said:

The only time you use it is for confirmation bias.

 

LOL.  For many, that's all they are interested in.

[rumak]

On 12/23/2024 at 11:13 PM, rumak said:

Red Phoenix (and OTHERS )  ,  if unable to locate elsewhere...... a long summation today on Jeff Childers Coffee & Covid  on Substack . Dec 23 . (about a peer-reviewed study with Covid "vaccine" center stage )     Here is a quick link to get to the EXCELLENT  summation by Jeff Childers.   Scroll down to where it starts :     https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/joes-war-monday-december-23-2024      .   Worth reading !

[Red Phoenix]

4 hours ago, rumak said:

On 12/23/2024 at 5:13 PM, rumak said:

Red Phoenix (and OTHERS )  ,  if unable to locate elsewhere...... a long summation today on Jeff Childers Coffee & Covid  on Substack . Dec 23 . (about a peer-reviewed study with Covid "vaccine" center stage )     Here is a quick link to get to the EXCELLENT  summation by Jeff Childers.   Scroll down to where it starts :     https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/joes-war-monday-december-23-2024      .   Worth reading !

 

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/joes-war-monday-december-23-2024

 

Thanks and yes, Jeff Childers on his free Coffee&Covid substack Newsletter always provides very to the point background and comments on the news events of the day. 

 

@rumak I just read one of the best insightful articles on 'Covid-vaccines' that I ever came across. 

> https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-does-the-covid-vaccine-persist

Highly recommended.

 

[rumak]

5 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/joes-war-monday-december-23-2024

 

Thanks and yes, Jeff Childers on his free Coffee&Covid substack Newsletter always provides very to the point background and comments on the news events of the day. 

 

@rumak I just read one of the best insightful articles on 'Covid-vaccines' that I ever came across. 

> https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-does-the-covid-vaccine-persist

Highly recommended.

 

 

thanks !   I will read it .... have heard good things about MW doctor .

 

 C&C is my daily dose of "events of the day"