Did We Really Land on the Moon?

[scottiejohn]

9 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Gamma, can you study them and summarize it for us? 

Please do not encourage that Troll!

[Gobbler]

2 hours ago, Andre0720 said:

So you have some credentials on being a 'Knowledge expert' now have you?

 

Do you have evidence to the contrary?

[frank83628]

On 1/25/2025 at 9:04 PM, Kinnock said:

Nobody honestly believes man didn't land on the moon. 

 

It's just that total losers who've never achieved anything have found that spouting nonesense conspiracy theories and denigrating one of man's greatest achievements can get a reaction on social media that they could never hope to get by posting about their own lives.

 

Don't feed the trolls and let them slip back into the darkness of their little cave of ignorance.

People have raised questions or had doubts way before social media. 

[Stiddle Mump]

14 hours ago, khunJam said:

Talk about conspiracy theories. I think some people are just too comfortable not having to deal with knowledge.

I don't agree with you Sir.

 

The evidence for the 'big' events is out there. Just have to look. Dinosaurs?! Start of WW1?! Start of WW11?! Fake atom bombs. Moon-walking! JFK! Princess Di! 9/11 etc.

 

There are two versions of history. The one we are told and the truth.

[Andre0720]

36 minutes ago, Gobbler said:

 

Do you have evidence to the contrary?

the burden of proof lies with the party asserting an allegation of fact. It's a fundamental principle.

 

In simple terms, the burden of proof means the obligation to prove your claims or allegations. The party with the burden of proof must:

• Produce evidence;

Just like I cannot prove that Leprechauns do not exist..  Example often given...

[Skeptic7]

On 1/25/2025 at 7:37 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Of course the Americans didn't do the deed. Simply a hoax. Along with most other ground-breaking events. 

 

There are even bigger whoppers. The two 'so-called' atom bombs that supposedly hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki for one. But another topic for that hot spud.

What planet in the multiverse are you trippin' on❓

[Skeptic7]

Someone should make a poll on this subject. Oh wait...I did in 2020❗😁

 

Poll is still open. Vote in the link below...

 

 

[Iron Tongue]

Give it up.

There is physical evidence left on the moon in the form of RetroReflectors.

These are mirrors left on the moon's surface that Earth-based lasers use to calculate the exact distance between Earth and Moon.

Currently there are 6 working ones left by the USA, Soviet Union, and India.  Yes, even India.

These reflectors have even been used to bounce laser light back to Earth.

 

[Stiddle Mump]

13 minutes ago, Skeptic7 said:

What planet in the multiverse are you trippin' on❓

 

Rather than address the evidence, you attempt humour. I'm OK with that.

 

Did you listen to that phone call POTUS Nixon got from the moon? No? I'll repeat the bit that was squashed out. ''Sorry Dicko, Stanley says to end it there before the Ruskies trace it.''

 

My favourite is the fake atom bombs that hit Hissy and Naggy. The official line is nothing could be further from the truth; and easily disproved.

 

Oh yes! Princess Di was reported on English Radio, and French TV, to have walked to the ambulance after the crash.

 

As I say. There is the history we are told, and there is the truth.

[Gobbler]

53 minutes ago, Andre0720 said:

the burden of proof lies with the party asserting an allegation of fact. It's a fundamental principle.

 

In simple terms, the burden of proof means the obligation to prove your claims or allegations. The party with the burden of proof must:

• Produce evidence;

Just like I cannot prove that Leprechauns do not exist..  Example often given...

I never claimed anything. I gave my informed opinion.  Stop trying to bite my ankles.

[CharlieH]

Post removed, DO NOT make personal remarks or attacks.

[Stiddle Mump]

6 minutes ago, Trentham said:

You poor sad little creature.

I'm not sad Sir.

 

Once you realise that what you are told about the 'big' events, is actually a load of old cowpoo, you see things differently.

 

 

[spidermike007]

There are a lot of very bizarre science deniers out there who love to cry fake. What can one say? All you can do is shake your head and say I'm sorry your brain was wired like that. 

[BritManToo]

11 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

There are a lot of very bizarre science deniers out there who love to cry fake. What can one say? All you can do is shake your head and say I'm sorry your brain was wired like that. 

I don't deny anything, but do point out some very questionable facts and photos that NASA produced.

 

And what's even more odd, if I'd typed "fake moon landing shadows" into Google 5 years back, I would have got 50 photos with dodgy shadows going in all directions. Now they've all disappeared.

[farangkinok]

 

[Hummin]

41 minutes ago, Iron Tongue said:

Give it up.

There is physical evidence left on the moon in the form of RetroReflectors.

These are mirrors left on the moon's surface that Earth-based lasers use to calculate the exact distance between Earth and Moon.

Currently there are 6 working ones left by the USA, Soviet Union, and India.  Yes, even India.

These reflectors have even been used to bounce laser light back to Earth.

 

Credit photographer missing 😁🤔😂

[Hummin]

6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I don't deny anything, but do point out some very questionable facts and photos that NASA produced.

Simple made up distractions by the 5. Colonists 

[Hummin]

13 hours ago, Gobbler said:

deGrasse Tyson is a schmuck.  He's still clinging to the theory that Covid started in a wet market and the covid shots are safe. 

 

He's a joke.  He might as well start a podcast alongside Bill Nye the Science Guy.

Degrasse Tyson never make claims of proofs outside his fields of expertise. Another lie, if you do not find source for your claims

[DualSportBiker]

On 1/25/2025 at 7:37 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Of course the Americans didn't do the deed. Simply a hoax. Along with most other ground-breaking events. 

 

There are even bigger whoppers. The two 'so-called' atom bombs that supposedly hit Hiroshima and Nagasaki for one. But another topic for that hot spud.

So, riddle me this. Who put the retroreflectors on the moon? You know, the mirrors that reflect back to source so we can accurately measure the distance to the moon and it's slow recession (38mm per year)?

 

Of course they were staged. The 400,000 engineers across 20,000 companies working on the Apollo missions all kept the secrets safe. And the Ruskies and Chinese all agreed they should just let the 'Muricans lay one over them for once without any FUD. Sure. 

 

Whatever you are taking, consider upping the dose :)

[Skeptic7]

29 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

Rather than address the evidence, you attempt humour. I'm OK with that.

 

Did you listen to that phone call POTUS Nixon got from the moon? No? I'll repeat the bit that was squashed out. ''Sorry Dicko, Stanley says to end it there before the Ruskies trace it.''

 

My favourite is the fake atom bombs that hit Hissy and Naggy. The official line is nothing could be further from the truth; and easily disproved.

 

Oh yes! Princess Di was reported on English Radio, and French TV, to have walked to the ambulance after the crash.

 

As I say. There is the history we are told, and there is the truth.

Admittedly, my attempt at humor was so-so. You on the other hand are LOL hilarious while not even tryng❗

[Stiddle Mump]

47 minutes ago, Iron Tongue said:

Give it up.

There is physical evidence left on the moon in the form of RetroReflectors.

These are mirrors left on the moon's surface that Earth-based lasers use to calculate the exact distance between Earth and Moon.

Currently there are 6 working ones left by the USA, Soviet Union, and India.  Yes, even India.

These reflectors have even been used to bounce laser light back to Earth.

 

Indeed!

 

But don't forget the speed of light was changed quite recently.

[DualSportBiker]

14 hours ago, save the frogs said:

According to this guy, ancient vedic texts claim it is impossible to go to the moon.

But I don't think we have anyone on AN who has studied the ancient vedic texts. 

Gamma, can you study them and summarize it for us? 

 

3. The Vedic texts state it is impossible to travel to the moon pg 27
4. The lies of NASA pg 34
5. Vedic Cosmology pg 42

 

 

 

 

Who cares what they say - they were clueless. You might as well quote anyone from 150 years ago and before - none of them had even the rudimentary science knowledge that you do.

[Gobbler]

3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Degrasse Tyson never make claims of proofs outside his fields of expertise. Another lie, if you do not find source for your claims

 

I watched his interview with Joe Rogan and did what you just said he didn't. 

 

Who is lying?  I think you are. 

[Will B Good]

On 1/25/2025 at 6:40 PM, save the frogs said:

An 8 year old can figure this out. 

 

 

 

 

The clip of Buzz Aldrin allegedly saying, “We never landed on the moon” or “We never went there,” is often taken out of context and misrepresented. Buzz Aldrin has consistently affirmed that the Apollo 11 mission did land on the Moon in 1969. He has been an outspoken advocate of space exploration and has repeatedly shared detailed accounts of his experience on the Moon.

 

Some of these clips are edited or spliced to create the false impression that Aldrin is denying the Moon landing. In one instance, Aldrin responded to a young girl’s question about why we haven’t been back to the Moon by saying something like, “We didn’t go there”—but this was part of a broader comment about the lack of follow-up Moon missions after Apollo, not a denial of the original landing.

 

In short, these videos are manipulated or misleading. Buzz Aldrin stands firmly by the reality of the Moon landing.

[DualSportBiker]

On 1/25/2025 at 6:27 PM, OneMoreFarang said:

I remember someone explained it like this: Imagine how many people would have to be involved to fake this. And then remember that all those people would have to be quiet about that forever, maybe 50 years or more.

How likely is that?

Around 400,000 worked on Apollo tech, across around 20,000 companies... No chance in hell that a fake project would not have been leaked.

[Stiddle Mump]

2 minutes ago, DualSportBiker said:

Who put the retroreflectors on the moon? You know, the mirrors that reflect back to source so we can accurately measure the distance to the moon and it's slow recession (38mm per year)?

 

Of course they were staged. The 400,000 engineers across 20,000 companies working on the Apollo missions all kept the secrets safe. And the Ruskies and Chinese all agreed they should just let the 'Muricans lay one over them for once without any FUD. Sure. 

Must refer you to my last post where I explained that the speed of light was recently changed.

 

Only 69 people were in the know about the moon landing hoaxes. i was not one of them by the way. But I know a man who was.

[Skeptic7]

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I don't agree with you Sir.

 

The evidence for the 'big' events is out there. Just have to look. Dinosaurs?! Start of WW1?! Start of WW11?! Fake atom bombs. Moon-walking! JFK! Princess Di! 9/11 etc.

 

There are two versions of history. The one we are told and the truth.

Is there any mainstream history or teaching you do accept as true ⁉️ Gonna go out on a limb here and assume you are also a believer in god...and are a FLERF (Flat Earther) too...yes❓

[Will B Good]

9 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

But don't forget the speed of light was changed quite recently.

 

WHAT??

 

You mean measurements have been further refined to indicate a more accurate measurement of what its 'true' value might be?

[Andre0720]

33 minutes ago, Gobbler said:

I never claimed anything. I gave my informed opinion.  Stop trying to bite my ankles.

De

•  

• Popular Post

Posted 13 hours ago

18 hours ago, Andre0720 said:

 

deGrasse Tyson is a schmuck.

And then: I never claimed anything. I gave my informed opinion. "

 

Just appeared to me that this might be construed as a 'Claim of some knowledge'.

 

My mistake and my apologies sir....

 

[ignore it]