Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, swissie said:

Currently, Donalds approval rating is around 53 % in the US, while the rest of the "western world" wonders how something like this could have happened.

Wondering how a guy can put "the western alliance" in jeopardy that has benefitted all the members of this alliance since WW2.

 

In Europe, the Person that is named Donald J.Trump is being considered as a pompous, erratic, overbearing character. If not for his money and fame, he would be spending his time in a psychiatric institution for his own good. General consensus.

 

Europeans are still puzzeled: What is so terribly wrong with the political/economical system in the US, that has elevated Donald into the highest office that this nation has to offer?

 

Me, and the overwhelming majority of Europeans would just like to know why the American electorate came to the conclusion, that the time is ripe for a person like Donald. Or, in other words: What is so terribly wrong in the US that made them vote for Donald?

 

I look foreward to many contributions from US posters. The more, the better. It might help Europeans to better understand what is happening in the US. Europeans (and the rest of the "free world) hunger for an explanation, boiling down to 1 word = WHY?

 

Intelligent people predicted a Trump win after the 60 minutes interview. Only idiots were surprised. The average liberal in Europe is an idiot.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

Intelligent people predicted a Trump win after the 60 minutes interview. Only idiots were surprised. The average liberal in Europe is an idiot.

 

 

Whilst that is a bit of a sweeping statement...............there is some truth to it.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Still looking for comments like: " What is so terribly wrong with the political/economical system in the US, that has elevated Donald into the highest office that this nation has to offer?

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, TheAppletons said:

I will be forthright in answering your question - people in the USA don't care what people in Europe think.

 

Sucks but it's true.

So Australia is buying nuclear subs worth 500 billion buy Boing aircrafts and getting threatened with 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium   

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

How is dragging Europe into essentially direct war with Russia by blasting UK and USA missiles deep inside Russia be "benefitting members of the alliance"??

 

Illegitimate and insecure Presidency is a clear danger to life on earth. We need much more electoral integrity to ensure highjinks like in 2020 can never happen again(see my avatar, fake news and intel claiming the biden corruption laptop was a Russian plant, mules mass harvesting ballots, dems saying voter id is racist, no proper recounts etc etc).

 

Not knowing of the above explains why uninformed rest of worlders cant understand why Trump was desperately needed, and has such massive support.

It is the "economical alliance" I mainly refer to. Economical alliances go hand in hand with military alliances.

Posted
41 minutes ago, swissie said:

In Europe, the Person that is named Donald J.Trump is being considered as a pompous, erratic, overbearing character. If not for his money and fame, he would be spending his time in a psychiatric institution for his own good. General consensus.

 

Europeans are still puzzeled: What is so terribly wrong with the political/economical system in the US, that has elevated Donald into the highest office that this nation has to offer?

 

Regarding being pompous and overbearing, when you're in a powerful position do you really need to act timid and have false humility? I've seen people with way less power (or no power) just as pompous and over-bearing. 

 

As Shakespeare said, "there is nothing good or bad. Only thinking makes it so." 

Maybe the status quo needs to be upended and maybe the world needs someone who is more outside the box than most other politicians.

No one knows what he will do yet, so how can you judge? 

 

image.png.9622e203bd7194d308f7810f8fe34d40.png

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, swissie said:

Me, and the overwhelming majority of Europeans would just like to know why the American electorate came to the conclusion, that the time is ripe for a person like Donald.

 

Americans were primarily concerned because 5 or 6 million people came into the country illegally and were given money, living, accommodations, and health care, while nobody even bothered to check what their backgrounds were. Americans don't like that and did something about it. Apparently, Europeans don't care who comes into their countries and lives freely off them. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swissie said:

In Europe, the Person that is named Donald J.Trump is being considered as a pompous, erratic, overbearing character. If not for his money and fame, he would be spending his time in a psychiatric institution for his own good. General consensus.

Most Brits I hear absolutely love his approach to immigration and 'only two genders'. Most are wishing we had a leader with such conviction on those topics. 

Maybe the UK is an outlier. Or maybe your comment was just wishful thinking. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swissie said:

Currently, Donalds approval rating is around 53 % in the US, while the rest of the "western world" wonders how something like this could have happened.

Wondering how a guy can put "the western alliance" in jeopardy that has benefitted all the members of this alliance since WW2.

 

In Europe, the Person that is named Donald J.Trump is being considered as a pompous, erratic, overbearing character. If not for his money and fame, he would be spending his time in a psychiatric institution for his own good. General consensus.

 

Europeans are still puzzeled: What is so terribly wrong with the political/economical system in the US, that has elevated Donald into the highest office that this nation has to offer?

 

Me, and the overwhelming majority of Europeans would just like to know why the American electorate came to the conclusion, that the time is ripe for a person like Donald. Or, in other words: What is so terribly wrong in the US that made them vote for Donald?

 

I look foreward to many contributions from US posters. The more, the better. It might help Europeans to better understand what is happening in the US. Europeans (and the rest of the "free world) hunger for an explanation, boiling down to 1 word = WHY?

 

Why do you need to post something like this when it's obvious what your opinion is? BTW is outstanding that that you can speak for "the overwhelming majority of Europeans". When was the last time you had a conversation with these hundreds of millions of people about Trump?

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Most Brits I hear absolutely love his approach to immigration and 'only two genders'. Most are wishing we had a leader with such conviction on those topics. 

Where did you get that BS from?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Most Brits I hear absolutely love his approach to immigration and 'only two genders'. Most are wishing we had a leader with such conviction on those topics. 

Maybe the UK is an outlier. Or maybe your comment was just wishful thinking. 

Nope. Comment was absolute baiting nonsense.

Posted
Just now, scottiejohn said:

Where did you get that BS from?

Yep. You're correct. Everyone in Britain is happy with Starmer. I tip my hat to your political nous. Well done.

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:
12 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Most Brits I hear absolutely love his approach to immigration and 'only two genders'. Most are wishing we had a leader with such conviction on those topics. 

Where did you get that BS from?

Most Brits, and it is not BS.

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, connda said:

If you haven't noticed, the is a conservative voter backlash among the public.  In Romania Călin Georgescu took 22% of the votes and the courts annulled the election, because?  He wasn't supposed to win.  He's the wrong candidate.  He's like conservative.  All conservatives are in the EU are not branded "Far-Right Wing Extremists" as well as "Putin's Puppets." It's all nonsense.  The status quo does not want change via the ballot box so they are willing to upend democracy and call it "saving democracy."  The status quo IS the problem.

So the betting pools are not betting that Călin Georgescu will now take 40% of the vote in the upcoming election.  Why?  Because the voters are rebelling against the move to upend democracy in the name of "saving democracy." People aren't stupid - they was though it.

That's now the state of the EU.  Talk about banning the German AfD, banning France's National Rally, and banning anyone who threatens the "status quo" which has worn out its welcome - and the people are rebelling: at the ballot box.

That's what happened in the US.  Same same, not different.   The vast majority of European voters are about to vote into office the candidates and the parties that they are being told by the status quo are "dangerous."  People are tired - they want change.

I would be more than happy to see the criminal Fascists of the German NSAFD banned, better yesterday then tomorrow.

Posted
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Why do you need to post something like this when it's obvious what your opinion is? BTW is outstanding that that you can speak for "the overwhelming majority of Europeans". When was the last time you had a conversation with these hundreds of millions of people about Trump?

Currently, the "approval rate" of European voters supporting "Donalds Universe" is about 15%.  According to polls.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...