Popular Post placeholder Posted 23 hours ago Popular Post Posted 23 hours ago A small government team regulating the sort of autonomous cars that Elon Musk says represent the future of Tesla, his car company, is getting cut nearly in half by the Musk-led U.S. Doge Service, according to people briefed on the reductions. https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/doge-employee-cuts-fall-heavily-on-agency-that-regulates-musk-s-tesla/ar-AA1ztOIP 1 1 1 1 1
Popular Post blaze master Posted 22 hours ago Popular Post Posted 22 hours ago Trash article with no evidence other than trust me bro. 1 2 1 2 1
Popular Post CallumWK Posted 21 hours ago Popular Post Posted 21 hours ago 31 minutes ago, blaze master said: Trash article with no evidence other than trust me bro. No one so blind as those who don't want to see 1 1 1 3
Popular Post mogandave Posted 21 hours ago Popular Post Posted 21 hours ago The same sort of cars that Musk’s competitors are trying to build as well, yes? So it was part of a flat 10 cut to the department. I heard that DOGE is looking into cuts in the IRS. The same IRS that reviews Musk’s tax returns. Weak, dishonest nonsense. 1 1 1 2
Popular Post placeholder Posted 10 hours ago Author Popular Post Posted 10 hours ago 12 hours ago, blaze master said: Trash article with no evidence other than trust me bro. You miss the point. We shouldn't have to rely on "trust me bro" when musk says it. I can't believe that someone is so naive as to believe that conflict of interest rules aren't necessary. 2 1 1
candide Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 11 hours ago, mogandave said: The same sort of cars that Musk’s competitors are trying to build as well, yes? So it was part of a flat 10 cut to the department. I heard that DOGE is looking into cuts in the IRS. The same IRS that reviews Musk’s tax returns. Weak, dishonest nonsense. Musk's competitors don't decide who's going to be fired....... 1 1
blaze master Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, placeholder said: You miss the point. We shouldn't have to rely on "trust me bro" when musk says it. I can't believe that someone is so naive as to believe that conflict of interest rules aren't necessary. Have the sources come forward. 1
Popular Post placeholder Posted 10 hours ago Author Popular Post Posted 10 hours ago 11 hours ago, mogandave said: The same sort of cars that Musk’s competitors are trying to build as well, yes? So it was part of a flat 10 cut to the department. I heard that DOGE is looking into cuts in the IRS. The same IRS that reviews Musk’s tax returns. Weak, dishonest nonsense. No. If you had bothered to acquaint yourself with the facts you would know that musk is attempting to get approval for his so-called self-driving system from this agency. No other automobile makers are doing that. And your point about the IRS is even worse. Once again your airing your ignorance in public. The bide administration added lots of IRS agents specifically to review the tax avoidance and downright evasion practice by the very wealthy. A huge amount of income for the government is being missed currently. So there is an inherent conflict of interest there. 1 5
placeholder Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, blaze master said: Have the sources come forward. I don't think you understand why there are conflict of interest rules and such a thing as blind trusts. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS21656.html 1 1
blaze master Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 2 minutes ago, placeholder said: I don't think you understand why there are conflict of interest rules and such a thing as blind trusts. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS21656.html Stop it. 2 1 1
Yagoda Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago I guess the OP does not understand how men like, for example, Sidney Hillman and Elon Musk operate in the context of the US government. 1 1
mogandave Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 15 minutes ago, placeholder said: No. If you had bothered to acquaint yourself with the facts you would know that musk is attempting to get approval for his so-called self-driving system from this agency. No other automobile makers are doing that. And your point about the IRS is even worse. Once again your airing your ignorance in public. The bide administration added lots of IRS agents specifically to review the tax avoidance and downright evasion practice by the very wealthy. A huge amount of income for the government is being missed currently. So there is an inherent conflict of interest there. Facts not in evidence you mean? So with half the staff, approval should take twice as long, yes? The IRS has nothing to do tax avoidance, that would be Congress, and I think tax evaders could be identified much more effectively than adding staff. Whai is a typical tax evasion strategy used by the very wealthy? Tax evasion is illegal. That’s how they got Cohen to flip on Trump. Do you think Musk and or Trump are tax evaders? 1 1
Popular Post Dan O Posted 9 hours ago Popular Post Posted 9 hours ago 8 minutes ago, mogandave said: Facts not in evidence you mean? So with half the staff, approval should take twice as long, yes? The IRS has nothing to do tax avoidance, that would be Congress, and I think tax evaders could be identified much more effectively than adding staff. Whai is a typical tax evasion strategy used by the very wealthy? Tax evasion is illegal. That’s how they got Cohen to flip on Trump. Do you think Musk and or Trump are tax evaders? Well if I remember correctly, trump did lose his cases in NY over tax fraud didnt he? 2 1
Popular Post placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Popular Post Posted 9 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Yagoda said: I guess the OP does not understand how men like, for example, Sidney Hillman and Elon Musk operate in the context of the US government. First of all the Trump administration has been obfuscating about Elon Musk's role in DOGE. Trump says he's the head, others deny it. That will soon come to a head when a judge adjudicates the issue and the administration will be required to identify who heads DOGE. But regardless of that, the ethical principle of conflict of interest does exist. And you, apparently, are incapable of understanding why it exists. 1 1 2
placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago Just now, Dan O said: Well if I remember correctly, trump did lose his cases in NY over tax fraud didnt he? Now, be fair. It was the Trump Organization that lost, not Trump. And while it's true that it was charged with 17 felony counts, it was only convicted of 17 of them. 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 13 hours ago, placeholder said: A small government team regulating the sort of autonomous cars that Elon Musk says represent the future of Tesla, his car company, is getting cut nearly in half by the Musk-led U.S. Doge Service, according to people briefed on the reductions. https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/doge-employee-cuts-fall-heavily-on-agency-that-regulates-musk-s-tesla/ar-AA1ztOIP Good 1
Yagoda Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, placeholder said: First of all the Trump administration has been obfuscating about Elon Musk's role in DOGE. Trump says he's the head, others deny it. That will soon come to a head when a judge adjudicates the issue and the administration will be required to identify who heads DOGE. But regardless of that, the ethical principle of conflict of interest does exist. And you, apparently, are incapable of understanding why it exists. OK, pick and choose your ethics. Trump/Musk are on firm grounds ethically and constitutionally under US Law. I defy you to show us otherwise. Its laughable you preach "ethics" while applauding lawfare by your philosophical comrades Its my tax dollars btw not yours being stolen. 2
Dan O Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, placeholder said: Now, be fair. It was the Trump Organization that lost, not Trump. And while it's true that it was charged with 17 felony counts, it was only convicted of 17 of them. yeah I guess when your the president and legal genius of Your Namesake company, the blame will always be shifted on to the company and staffers. 1 1
placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 16 minutes ago, mogandave said: Facts not in evidence you mean? So with half the staff, approval should take twice as long, yes? The IRS has nothing to do tax avoidance, that would be Congress, and I think tax evaders could be identified much more effectively than adding staff. Whai is a typical tax evasion strategy used by the very wealthy? Tax evasion is illegal. That’s how they got Cohen to flip on Trump. Do you think Musk and or Trump are tax evaders? Or the surviving half might be intimidated into giving him what he wants rather than lose their jobs, yes? You're right about tax avoidance, but massively wrong about tax evasion. For years, the Republicans slashed the funding for the IRS. Tax evasion enforcement crashed. Trump Organization fined $1.6m for ‘brazen’ tax fraud https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/1/13/trump-organization-fined-1-6-million-for-tax-fraud IRS Said He Led the “Worst of the Worst” Tax Scams. Now He’s a Trump Adviser. https://truthout.org/articles/irs-said-he-led-the-worst-of-the-worst-tax-scams-now-hes-a-trump-adviser/ He Promised Huge Tax Refunds. Now Trump Wants Him to Lead the I.R.S. Since leaving Congress in 2023, Billy Long has peddled a pandemic-era tax credit that the I.R.S. has warned is a magnet for fraud. https://archive.ph/UPvu0#selection-683.0-687.130 1 1
Dan O Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Yagoda said: OK, pick and choose your ethics. Trump/Musk are on firm grounds ethically and constitutionally under US Law. I defy you to show us otherwise. Its laughable you preach "ethics" while applauding lawfare by your philosophical comrades Its my tax dollars btw not yours being stolen. Seems you are in need of lessons in ethics. The number of lawsuits open currently and the stays by the courts on several actions with Doge would say you are wrong and need to do some homework. You preach lawfare on anyone opposing trump LEGALLY but you ignore his admitted confessions he was going after anyone that challenged him in his loss in the prior election or bad mouthed him and that's exactly what he's been doing as recently as yesterday in more firings in the pentagon and military chain of command. 1 1
billd766 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 14 hours ago, placeholder said: A small government team regulating the sort of autonomous cars that Elon Musk says represent the future of Tesla, his car company, is getting cut nearly in half by the Musk-led U.S. Doge Service, according to people briefed on the reductions. https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/doge-employee-cuts-fall-heavily-on-agency-that-regulates-musk-s-tesla/ar-AA1ztOIP Now isn't that a surprise? 1
Popular Post placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Popular Post Posted 9 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Yagoda said: OK, pick and choose your ethics. Trump/Musk are on firm grounds ethically and constitutionally under US Law. I defy you to show us otherwise. Its laughable you preach "ethics" while applauding lawfare by your philosophical comrades Its my tax dollars btw not yours being stolen. Your claim about ethics is ludicrous. Unless you believe that conflict of interest rules and laws are somehow unwarranted in government. As for the lawfare charge...William Barr tried that one on when he was Attorney General. He failed utterly. And of course you seem to be making an assumption that there is significant theft within the government. How can the tax dollars of a non-American like you be stolen? Maybe you have a green card? 1 1 1
placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: Good Another Musk fanboy. 1 1
billd766 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 46 minutes ago, blaze master said: Stop it. Why? Don't you like the truth when it is put in front of you? 1 1
Yagoda Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Dan O said: Seems you are in need of lessons in ethics. The number of lawsuits open currently and the stays by the courts on several actions with Doge would say you are wrong and need to do some homework. You preach lawfare on anyone opposing trump LEGALLY but you ignore his admitted confessions he was going after anyone that challenged him in his loss in the prior election or bad mouthed him and that's exactly what he's been doing as recently as yesterday in more firings in the pentagon and military chain of command. Show me one lawsuit that will be sucessful. Pick one. The one you want. Show us how its a winner. You wont and cant. you dont even know how to cite. 1 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 2 minutes ago, placeholder said: Another Musk fanboy. Yes he is doing a great job. 1
Popular Post blaze master Posted 9 hours ago Popular Post Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, billd766 said: Why? Don't you like the truth when it is put in front of you? 3 people are making claims. They need to come forward. That's the truth or did you miss that part ? 3
placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Harrisfan said: Yes he is doing a great job. You know this how? Just another faith-based comment. You might want to look at this: https://archive.ph/t2oXf#selection-4813.0-4833.1 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Just now, placeholder said: You know this how? Just another faith-based comment. You might want to look at this: https://archive.ph/t2oXf#selection-4813.0-4833.1 No I don't care. Keep whining for 4 years. Everybody is laughing at you. 1 1
placeholder Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, blaze master said: 3 people are making claims. They need to come forward. That's the truth or did you miss that part ? You are clearly incapable of understanding why conflict of interests laws and rules exist. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now