Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.94fcfd8d5cdcc72b1ca4669f9cbfdb45.png

Cameroni posted on this topic:  

"I have two air quality monitors in my house. Both of them have consistently throughout this whole burning season read "good air quality".

 

Sure there was some measurable effect, visibility clearly less, however, as far as burning seasons go this one was exceptionally mild. I never even ran the air purifiers once. That's how mild it was."

 

????

The above chart was captured on March 25, 2025, 6:40 pm.  Notice that the top 10 CLEANEST cities in Chiang Mai are all over 90 AQI.  The dirtiest top 10 hit 208.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Moonlover said:

 

PS. I still have memories of London's winter smog when I was a kid, when one had to careful not to bump into a lamp post when walking down the street. Thailand, not even Bangkok can bear comparison with that!

Indeed. I remember going to school in London in the early 1960's and having to wear a full-face balaclava because of the smog. So many kids had bronchitis.

 

The smoke here is seasonal and if you take precautions the problems can be mitigated. 

 

I'm much less happy with the rainy season, living upcountry.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

You make a gross assumption that the air is like this all year - it's not, it's cyclical.  This summer all those reds and dark reds will move over to Canada and California.  Then you will need to ask: "What makes people choose to live in bad air?"

Really?  You know the answer.

 

10 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I prefer warm weather with occasional bad air quality to cold, wet and windy weather with clean air.

Yeah - England and the US Pacific Northwest share that commonality: Cold, wet, fog, grey - too often.

Screenshot from 2025-03-25 19-47-57.png

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, connda said:

You make a gross assumption that the air is like this all year - it's not, it's cyclical.  This summer all those reds and dark reds will move over to Canada and California.  Then you will need to ask: "What makes people choose to live in bad air?"

Really?  You know the answer.

 

Yeah - England and the US Pacific Northwest share that commonality: Cold, wet, fog, grey - too often.

Screenshot from 2025-03-25 19-47-57.png

Maybe california will be on fire this year, you say that like its a certainty. They dont do it on purpose like thailand

  • Agree 1
Posted

IGNORANCE is the first word that came to mind. It take time before you feel the problems and that could be to late to fix. I sadly therefore is reducing my stay here to just a few months and stay in healthy air in Scandinavia for most of the year. ☹

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

I don't have a choice.  So after living here for 20+ years, how much has my life expectancy been reduced from what it would have been if I'd stayed in the UK?

Posted

I've lived mainly in Bangkok for the last 40 years. Now 83 years old and, so far, no ill effects whatsoever from pollution.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
17 hours ago, SingAPorn said:

Bangkok is a disaster of pollution at toxic levels.  and nothing is done to enhance public transport and mainly to discourage people from taking their private cars. Same in other places like Hua Hin where public transport is a disaster and no proper connections between Hua Hin and surrounding villages like Hin Lek Fai that have large communities living and commuting to Hua Hin center.

Did you forget that week of free train rides as the government knew of predicted high pollution levels and advised people to forgo vehicles - trains were packed daily! but pollution still reigned.  Until all the nations in S. Asia can stop the burning it will continue!  Just saying, I see the govt issuing high pollution alerts daily or as needed in each of the provinces, plus high temperature readings, and possibility of summer storms so at least they are aware of this problem but I think they also realize that unless all of S. Asia agrees to stop all the burning, there is little else the government can do.  BUT, masks N95, N99 and others can block out most of the 2.5 micron pollutants but I see very few westerners wearing them while my family does use the air purifiers in all rooms of our house plus whenvever we go outside we wear our masks.  I so see a few Thais wearing them but a lot of that is because they are required to wear them at work.  Funnuy how many on this forum complain bout this problem but how many actually wear masks when outside and use air purifiers in their abodes?

Posted

Usual situation: NO real enforcement, NO real consequences to an action, so there won't be any significant change.

That applies to almost EVERYTHING in this country. Too many snouts in the trough.

 

Asean Now Property Advertisement (1).png

Posted
1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

I've lived mainly in Bangkok for the last 40 years. Now 83 years old and, so far, no ill effects whatsoever from pollution.

 

And long may it continue!  Perhaps you will die at the age of 99, but had you lived somewhere with better air you would have lived to 100!

Posted
2 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

And long may it continue!  Perhaps you will die at the age of 99, but had you lived somewhere with better air you would have lived to 100!

Fair point !

Posted
16 hours ago, LarryLEB said:

image.png.94fcfd8d5cdcc72b1ca4669f9cbfdb45.png

Cameroni posted on this topic:  

"I have two air quality monitors in my house. Both of them have consistently throughout this whole burning season read "good air quality".

 

Sure there was some measurable effect, visibility clearly less, however, as far as burning seasons go this one was exceptionally mild. I never even ran the air purifiers once. That's how mild it was."

 

????

The above chart was captured on March 25, 2025, 6:40 pm.  Notice that the top 10 CLEANEST cities in Chiang Mai are all over 90 AQI.  The dirtiest top 10 hit 208.

 

That's right Larry, that is exactly what I said. I guess we are learning about the difference between real world and app info based on single location measurements.

 

The first thing to note is that AQI air quality measurements are based on a limited number of measuring points. I am not located in a busy city centre location or next to a region prone to sugar cane burning.  So whilst indeed AQI measurements may be accurate for that particular location where the measuring device is located, it is not accurate for all areas close to that general location.

 

I am not saying air quality was not impaired this season, it clearly was because I could see visibility to the mountains was impaired. However, despite using not one, but two, air quality measuring devices inside the house, I could not once find air quality being anything less than "good" using those monitors.

 

Again, this year the burning season has been exceptionally mild and the effects were minimal compared to other burning seasons. I never had to run the air purifiers this year, which is unheard of frankly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...