Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Having said that, the boss cop's rationale is suspect, as you would be unlikely to fly the coop if the going sentence is only 10,000 baht or similar, and you have a Thai wife.  Did they also make you pay the 20,000 at the station?

Posted

There was no abuse of power.

Sometimes, foreigners who are arrested are later discovered to be  engaged in other  criminal activities or are on overstay.

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thumbs Down 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, jts-khorat said:

 

The one who was treated unfairly was your wife, I give you that point.

 

But you were treated by the letter of the law, there was no corruption, no deviation from normal procedure, you got a fair hearing and also a fair penalty reflecting your offense.

 

You had a place to sleep like all the others, and even breakfast -- not quite half board, but what did you expect?

 

Where is this unfairness you speak of?

Well, how exactly do you define "a place to sleep"?  Is a stone floor such a place? I don’t think it is for at least 95% of the people in the civilized world. For me personally, it was almost like being in torturous conditions. In fact, I was deprived of the ability to sleep. Did I do something to deserve being subjected to such conditions?

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, JoseThailand said:

Still better than Russian jails

No. In Russian prisons, there are beds. The conditions in a Thai prison can be loosely compared to the conditions in which Russian prisons place inmates who violate the rules within the prison itself.

One important point I want to emphasize: As seen from my main post, all of my cellmates, who were Asians, seemed to be quite comfortable in this prison. For most Thais, sleeping on a bare floor is not a problem. This is nothing more than cultural and civilizational differences. While that night was torture for me, for the 15 people in my cell, it was more like staying in a 2-star hotel. My only complaint is with that "bad person" who, fully understanding everything I’ve mentioned above, sent me behind bars for the night and even tried to extract compromising information about me from someone close to me.

  • Agree 3
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hellfire said:

No. In Russian prisons, there are beds. The conditions in a Thai prison can be loosely compared to the conditions in which Russian prisons place inmates who violate the rules within the prison itself.

 

But in Russian jails beatings are quite common. Not so much in Thailand

  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, JoseThailand said:

 

But in Russian jails beatings are quite common. Not so much in Thailand

This definitely doesn’t apply to someone who drove a car after drinking a glass of vodka.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, jts-khorat said:

 

I would say: there was no reason for him to drink and then drive -- especially if he had his wife with him. If she also drank, a Bolt taxi is so cheap to basically cost nothing to a westerner.

 

Don't do the crime, if you cannot do the time.

As I sat there that night, I thought to myself—if they catch a serial killer, they would place him in exactly the same room I was in. Me, drinking 10-20 grams of alcohol in excess, and him—killing dozens of people. It seemed like, for the system, there’s no difference. It’s either a 1 (violated the law) or a 0 (did not violate the law).

Do you think such an approach should be accepted in the 21st century? With all our knowledge of history, our technological superiority, and other so-called "civilizational achievements"? Are we really civilized, or are we just pretending to be?

  • Agree 3
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, jts-khorat said:
5 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

There was no reason to Jail him - he is married and lives here, he was not a 'flight risk' and the BiB knew it.

 

Its clear (to me at least) from the Ops story that they wanted the 20,000 baht not as bail, but as 'fee' not to be jailed for the night.

 

I would say: there was no reason for him to drink and then drive -- especially if he had his wife with him. If she also drank, a Bolt taxi is so cheap to basically cost nothing to a westerner.

 

Don't do the crime, if you cannot do the time.

 

While I agree with your sentiment - the Ops BAC measurement was apparently equivalent to 0.027% BAC  - which places him a grey area of being over the limit for someone without a license (or a temp license), but well under the limit of someone on a full licence. 

 

As a comparison - the DUI limit in the UK is 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath (0.08% BAC equivalent) - the Op was still under the UK DUI limit.

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...