May 1, 2025May 1 7 minutes ago, dinsdale said: Deflection again. You said you're a "medical doctor" This is quite obviously a lie. Why would you say this? Mind you Katy Perry thinks she's an astronaut. 8 minutes ago, dinsdale said: Deflection again. You said you're a "medical doctor" This is quite obviously a lie. Why would you say this? Mind you Katy Perry thinks she's an astronaut. Referring to "Katie Perry" (who is that?) shows your level. Look for a fool for your games. It's not me.
May 1, 2025May 1 16 minutes ago, newbee2022 said: Referring to "Katie Perry" (who is that?) shows your level. Look for a fool for your games. It's not me. Oh dear. The "Doctor" has spoken. You really are pitiful. Tell me is it not a fool who calls themselves a doctor when they are not? You can't get past this now. Maybe time for another account Dr. newbee2022. You lied. I've caught you out. Go away. P.s. Katy not Kattie. You're not real bright for a "medical doctor".
May 1, 2025May 1 39 minutes ago, jas007 said: You have yet to respond to my question about the DNA sequence patented by Moderna in 2016. I have posted several questions on this thread, none of you lot want to answer them.
May 1, 2025May 1 9 minutes ago, dinsdale said: Oh dear. The "Doctor" has spoken. You really are pitiful. Tell me is it not a fool who calls themselves a doctor when they are not? You can't get past this now. Maybe time for another account Dr. newbee2022. You lied. I've caught you out. Go away. 9 minutes ago, dinsdale said: Oh dear. The "Doctor" has spoken. You really are pitiful. Tell me is it not a fool who calls themselves a doctor when they are not? You can't get past this now. Maybe time for another account Dr. newbee2022. You lied. I've caught you out. Go away. After my exam my friends went different ways. One was going for surgeon, another one for ENT, and another one for Pathology. We were surprised and ask him why he wants to go that route? He was laughing and answered; "there are too many fools and idiots outside. My clients are speechless." Well, this true anecdote came to my mind when I read your posts. Be careful with the word liar actually. It's not my fault if you didn't achieve as much in your life.
May 1, 2025May 1 Popular Post 2 minutes ago, Lacessit said: I have posted several questions on this thread, none of you lot want to answer them. I'll have to go back and look. I remember one time you wanted "sources" for something or other. I wasn't about to waste all day looking for "sources." And by now you should know what I think about "sources." Finding fake news to prove that fake news is fake news is an exercise in futility.
May 1, 2025May 1 9 minutes ago, jas007 said: I'll have to go back and look. I have just gone through this thread here is my "expert analysis" 😋 of the questions asked by @Lacessit in this thread Q If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident? A Once again the usual demonizing and completely incorrect conflation to say that those who did not want to be jabbed with mRNA juice must be anti-vaxxers. This is complete rubbish and simply parrots the get jabbed narrative and those that refuse are anti-vaxxers. Q ? Please post a PEER-REVIEWED study of injury caused by COVID vaccines. A Look them up yourself "peer reviewed" right up there with Google and Wikipedia as now discredited sources of information this "pandemic" has shown them for what they are biased, corrupt ,bought and paid for shills . Q Are you sure your tin hat is not too tight for you? A I'm not wearing it today thanks for asking.
May 1, 2025May 1 3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said: After my exam my friends went different ways. One was going for surgeon, another one for ENT, and another one for Pathology. We were surprised and ask him why he wants to go that route? He was laughing and answered; "there are too many fools and idiots outside. My clients are speechless." Well, this true anecdote came to my mind when I read your posts. Be careful with the word liar actually. It's not my fault if you didn't achieve as much in your life. And what about you? What did you specialize in? You can keep up this façade as long as you like but the longer you do the more you make yourself out for lying about being a doctor. My guess is no one on here looking at this believes you. You really have given no reason to be believed. Here's a simple question and it's not medical. Why are you on here? An obscure forum which IMHO wouldn't be somewhere a doctor would be bothered with. As for what I've achieved, and this is only part, I'm a qualified tradesman, I have BA with the major being political theory, I have a Diploma of Education, I have a CELTA I'm married with a kid and most importantly I've smoked hash at 18,000 feet altitude in the Himalayas. Guess I haven't much as you say. As for your "story" how about some detail or are you only going to deflect again because you lying about being a doctor. You're not a doctor. Again just pitiful you made up story about "vaccinating old folk" Time to slow down on the booze would be my advice. Regards Bob
May 1, 2025May 1 19 minutes ago, dinsdale said: And what about you? What did you specialize in? You can keep up this façade as long as you like but the longer you do the more you make yourself out for lying about being a doctor. My guess is no one on here looking at this believes you. You really have given no reason to be believed. Here's a simple question and it's not medical. Why are you on here? An obscure forum which IMHO wouldn't be somewhere a doctor would be bothered with. As for what I've achieved, and this is only part, I'm a qualified tradesman, I have BA with the major being political theory, I have a Diploma of Education, I have a CELTA I'm married with a kid and most importantly I've smoked hash at 18,000 feet altitude in the Himalayas. Guess I haven't much as you say. As for your "story" how about some detail or are you only going to deflect again because you lying about being a doctor. You're not a doctor. Again just pitiful you made up story about "vaccinating old folk" Time to slow down on the booze would be my advice. Regards Bob You should stop taking drugs. (Cannabis) Not good for your health, your brain cells in particular. Q.e.d.
May 1, 2025May 1 42 minutes ago, newbee2022 said: You should stop taking drugs. (Cannabis) Not good for your health, your brain cells in particular. Q.e.d. Again a low intelligence comment and deflection from someone who claims to be a "medical doctor". Pitiful. You're a joke mate and the more you post the more you show yourself to be this. I do still wonder if this is a bot account. Seeming more and more likely.
May 1, 2025May 1 1 hour ago, johng said: I have just gone through this thread here is my "expert analysis" 😋 of the questions asked by @Lacessit in this thread Q If anti-vaxxers were given freedom of choice, even as children, would they (a) Roll the dice with Mother Nature? (b) Choose vaccinations where the science indicating they were effective was evident? A Once again the usual demonizing and completely incorrect conflation to say that those who did not want to be jabbed with mRNA juice must be anti-vaxxers. This is complete rubbish and simply parrots the get jabbed narrative and those that refuse are anti-vaxxers. Q ? Please post a PEER-REVIEWED study of injury caused by COVID vaccines. A Look them up yourself "peer reviewed" right up there with Google and Wikipedia as now discredited sources of information this "pandemic" has shown them for what they are biased, corrupt ,bought and paid for shills . Q Are you sure your tin hat is not too tight for you? A I'm not wearing it today thanks for asking. Q1 - deflection, does not answer the question. Q2 - You can't post them because they don't exist. Q3 - I asked the question because I thought your brain was exploding. Perhaps it is imploding instead.
May 1, 2025May 1 9 hours ago, dinsdale said: Oh dear. The "Doctor" has spoken. You really are pitiful. Tell me is it not a fool who calls themselves a doctor when they are not? You can't get past this now. Maybe time for another account Dr. newbee2022. You lied. I've caught you out. Go away. P.s. Katy not Kattie. You're not real bright for a "medical doctor". Have you been in space? This was an all-women space flight; she never said she wanted to be an astronaut. She even kissed the ground when she came back. You are just jealous.
May 2, 2025May 2 On 4/30/2025 at 7:51 PM, jas007 said: Behind door A, a genetically engineered virus containing a sequence patented by Moderna in 2016 that would occur naturally in only one of every three trillion rolls of the dice. Or, behind Door B, we have a mere fluke. A mere coincidence. Moderna patents a viral sequence in 2016, and yet, through a very very lucky roll of the cosmic dice, that same sequence shows up in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Nothing to see here. Move along To those who control the purse strings nothing is left to chance.
May 2, 2025May 2 15 hours ago, johng said: Look them up yourself "peer reviewed" right up there with Google and Wikipedia as now discredited sources of information this "pandemic" has shown them for what they are biased, corrupt ,bought and paid for shills Wickedpedia is a really good source of biased, Materialistic Scientism.
May 2, 2025May 2 7 minutes ago, Woke to Sounds said: To those who control the purse strings nothing is left to chance. Meaning, I presume, that 1 in 3 trillion is pretty close to a sure thing?
May 2, 2025May 2 8 minutes ago, jas007 said: Meaning, I presume, that 1 in 3 trillion is pretty close to a sure thing? Meaning, there are no coincidences. (it was planned)
May 2, 2025May 2 On 4/30/2025 at 7:38 PM, newbee2022 said: Hogwash Before you argue get your facts straight
May 2, 2025May 2 Popular Post On 4/29/2025 at 4:04 PM, jas007 said: Sure, but did they cross the line? It's one thing to be a business, it's something else again to be a business that profits from death and actively participate in making that happen. I would say yes they did. The reason I say this is how many of the medical profession knew the vaccine was not properly tested yet they still went along with pushing it on people? I would say 99% if not them all knew it was a "test" vaccine, rushed out without proper oversight.
May 2, 2025May 2 11 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said: I would say yes they did. The reason I say this is how many of the medical profession knew the vaccine was not properly tested yet they still went along with pushing it on people? I would say 99% if not them all knew it was a "test" vaccine, rushed out without proper oversight. Nonsense😂😂😂
May 2, 2025May 2 12 minutes ago, newbee2022 said: Nonsense😂😂😂 Are you really as daft as you appear or is it a bad joke? You dont think doctors knew the vaccine was pushed through without all the usual testing?
May 2, 2025May 2 2 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said: Are you really as daft as you appear or is it a bad joke? You dont think doctors knew the vaccine was pushed through without all the usual testing? Only idiots would deny that
May 2, 2025May 2 3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said: Only idiots would deny that At least you have defined what you are.
May 2, 2025May 2 Popular Post 1 hour ago, Photoguy21 said: Are you really as daft as you appear or is it a bad joke? You dont think doctors knew the vaccine was pushed through without all the usual testing? No one needed to be a medical doctor to know what was going on back then. All you had to do was pay attention and read publicly available information. Many doctors didn't have much choice. They could go along with the program or lose their jobs. Truly amazing. Propaganda works. And the doctors who spoke out and told the truth? Banished.
May 2, 2025May 2 22 hours ago, johng said: Q ? Please post a PEER-REVIEWED study of injury caused by COVID vaccines. A Look them up yourself "peer reviewed" right up there with Google and Wikipedia as now discredited sources of information this "pandemic" has shown them for what they are biased, corrupt ,bought and paid for shills . Peer review performs several important functions. I have been on the receiving end of it myself, with several papers I wrote, in the field of analytical chemistry. It subjects submitted papers to scrutiny by experts in the same field, identifying flaws in methodology, data analysis, and interpretation. It holds authors to high standards of research in their chosen field. It filters out low quality, erroneous and unsubstantiated claims made by authors. It is rigorous. Probably why vaccine injury papers don't make the grade. Your statements about peer review remind me of a dog howling at the moon.
May 2, 2025May 2 4 minutes ago, Lacessit said: Peer review performs several important functions. I have been on the receiving end of it myself, with several papers I wrote, in the field of analytical chemistry. It subjects submitted papers to scrutiny by experts in the same field, identifying flaws in methodology, data analysis, and interpretation. It holds authors to high standards of research in their chosen field. It filters out low quality, erroneous and unsubstantiated claims made by authors. It is rigorous. Probably why vaccine injury papers don't make the grade. Your statements about peer review remind me of a dog howling at the moon. Unfortunately you are wasting your time with this poster and a few others who really don't have a clue. My son qualified as a doctor at the University of Reading (UK) and decided to specialise after qualifying, and did so, specialising in infectious diseases, which took him to South Africa and South America, studying HIV, before returning to the UK to settle down. He has had several papers published and peer-reviewed, so I understand where you are coming from, however as I've said here and I've said previously, there are some absolute idiots out there and I have got no idea where they harvest their stupid/inane ideas from. Luckily enough they are in the extreme minority and facts supported by science and thousands of universities, scientists, doctors and specialists as well as professors worldwide, just go to prove how stupid these people are.
May 2, 2025May 2 Author 28 minutes ago, Lacessit said: Peer review performs several important functions. I have been on the receiving end of it myself, with several papers I wrote, in the field of analytical chemistry. It subjects submitted papers to scrutiny by experts in the same field, identifying flaws in methodology, data analysis, and interpretation. It holds authors to high standards of research in their chosen field. It filters out low quality, erroneous and unsubstantiated claims made by authors. It is rigorous. Probably why vaccine injury papers don't make the grade. Your statements about peer review remind me of a dog howling at the moon. This 1.5 minute clip features Allan SAVORY providing his view on 'peer-reviewed' science (or actually the meagre substitute to which that process has detoriated), and it hits the nail square on the head. Allan Savory on 'peer reviewed' science.mp4
May 2, 2025May 2 1 hour ago, xylophone said: Luckily enough they are in the extreme minority Incorrect, our ranks are growing fast, hence the threads such as (I am paraphrasing off the top of my head) "Conspiracy theorists, why so many and what can we do about them?" or "Why do people not follow science anymore?", etc. Anyone still pushing the controversial and unethical Covid jab is living in a dangerous and nefarious bubble. The medical profession has been seriously damaged these past five years, and it will take time to build back trust in it. Fortunately, there still are thousands of good physicians (those who were "discredited by the medical community" – a fancy synonym for "excommunicated").
May 2, 2025May 2 3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said: This 1.5 minute clip features Allan SAVORY providing his view on 'peer-reviewed' science (or actually the meagre substitute to which that process has detoriated), and it hits the nail square on the head. Allan Savory on 'peer reviewed' science.mp4 2.12 MB · 0 downloads A farmer and former politician. Youtube clip. ( non-peer-reviewed of course ). Zero scientific qualifications. You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel.
May 2, 2025May 2 1 hour ago, rattlesnake said: Incorrect, our ranks are growing fast, hence the threads such as (I am paraphrasing off the top of my head) "Conspiracy theorists, why so many and what can we do about them?" or "Why do people not follow science anymore?", etc. Anyone still pushing the controversial and unethical Covid jab is living in a dangerous and nefarious bubble. The medical profession has been seriously damaged these past five years, and it will take time to build back trust in it. Fortunately, there still are thousands of good physicians (those who were "discredited by the medical community" – a fancy synonym for "excommunicated"). Back in the 17th or 18th century, I'll just bet you'd be one of the guys supporting the miasmic theory of disease transmission. People don't follow science because it is more comfortable to deny reality.
May 3, 2025May 3 On 5/2/2025 at 3:01 PM, Lacessit said: Back in the 17th or 18th century, I'll just bet you'd be one of the guys supporting the miasmic theory of disease transmission. Of course. And no need to project oneself to the 17th or 18th century. Pasteur's germ theory of disease (and that is what it is and called, a theory) is still refutable nowadays, and refuted it has been over time, by a plethora of respected and competent individuals such as Antoine Béchamp or Rudolf Virchow, who dismissed this notion that disease comes from outside the body rather than from within. Florence Nightingale also famously stated that in her experience, smallpox was not something that was “caught” from outside but grown from within.
May 3, 2025May 3 On 5/2/2025 at 2:57 PM, Lacessit said: A farmer and former politician. Youtube clip. ( non-peer-reviewed of course ). Zero scientific qualifications. You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Doesn't change anything to the fact that he hits the nail square on the head.
Create an account or sign in to comment