Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Starmer’s Brexit Reset: A Strategic Shift or a Sacrifice?

Featured Replies

27 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Due to Lawfare. Not a thing wrong with the policy or the reasoning behind it.

 

Starmer cancelled it, and wasted around £700 million.

 

The clueless creature is now running around kissing @rses to try and set up offshore return hubs, costs unknown, but it will be triple figure £ Millions.

 

You really should try engaging brain before engaging keyboard.

 

Here is Starmers 1st humiliation over his offshore hubs

 

IMG_3714.webp.488ded33fa149ad16be9b32ba95533ea.webp

 

there will be more to come.

Starmer cancelled the Tories failed Rwanda scam and saved tax payers £millions.

 

 

  • Replies 99
  • Views 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    He’s extending by 12 years the fishing deal Johnson negotiated and in exchange getting lots of goodies for the British economy.   Even British fishermen do well out of this deal, the removal

  • A betrayal of Brexit.  Starmer is giving tme country to illegal immigrants and Europe. Starmer should be tried for treason. 

  • He is selling Britain out.   He truly is a 'orrible little man. 

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Starmer cancelled the Tories failed Rwanda scam and saved tax payers £millions.

 

 

 

It never failed, because it never got off the ground due to Labour and Lawfare.

 

Starmer cancelled it and he now owns the waste of taxpayers cash. If he had a brain, he would have run it for 6 months to see what the deterrent effect was.

 

Instead we now have record numbers of Illegal Gimmegrants flocking across the Channel. And chicken brain running about trying to create offshore hubs. And being told to do one.

 

You are like Starmer at PMQ's when given something that you do not have a scripted answer for... A stunned goldfish impression, combined with the gushing of verbal diarrhoea.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

What have Labour achieved in the last year 

 

1. Record numbers of Illegal Immigrants

 

2. Unemployment heading up

 

3. National Debt heading up

 

4. Interest on the National Debt heading up.

 

5. increased hatred in the Labour Party.

 

Oops

 

Add inflation up to that list

 

 

1 hour ago, RayC said:

 

A sane and rational article 😀😀

 

Quote

The Brexiters must be defeated. There is no point debating with these people 

 

Quote

They must simply be vanquished

 

Seems like a person you could hold a civil conversation with, for about 2 seconds.

1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:

 

A sane and rational article 😀😀

 

 

 

Seems like a person you could hold a civil conversation with, for about 2 seconds.

 

The author obviously views further conversation as being pointless for various reasons. His last paragraph is telling:

 

"Why are the Brexiters so upset? ..

It can’t really be about such tiny, inoffensive ideas as a youth mobility scheme or health regulations on agri-foods. It’s something deeper. It’s the manner and existence of the deal itself.

 

This is why they’re so outraged ...

 

There is simply no deal that these people will support. There is no arrangement with Europe, no matter how benign and non-committal, which (they) would not call surrender."

13 hours ago, RayC said:

The author obviously views further conversation as being pointless for various reasons. His last paragraph is telling:

 

It was the 2 quotes that I posted that makes him an idiot

 

Quote

The Brexiters must be defeated. There is no point debating with these people 

 

Quote

They must simply be vanquished

 

I he calling for the genocide of 17 million voters ?
 

Change Brexiters to Illegal Gimmegrants, and he would already have been arrested, tried and jailed.

3 hours ago, The Cyclist said:

 

It was the 2 quotes that I posted that makes him an idiot

 

 

 

I he calling for the genocide of 17 million voters ?
 

Change Brexiters to Illegal Gimmegrants, and he would already have been arrested, tried and jailed.

 

Ridiculous hyperbole with a dose of self-pity thrown in for good measure.

 

To vanquish means to defeat. It does not imply or infer genocide.

 

If 17 million voters are all singing from the same hymn sheet, then surely there must be one posting on ASEAN who can detail what Brexit should look like? Clearly not the case to date.

 

The truth is that the 17 million voters didn't want the same thing. Many now have 'buyers regret' and would vote differently; many others would welcome more cordial relations with the EU, and do not have a problem with this latest deal. Sadly, there remain (no pun intended) a significant number of Brexiters for whom, as Dunt correctly points out:

 

"There is simply no deal that these people will support. There is no arrangement with Europe, no matter how benign and non-committal, which (they) would not call surrender". These are the people who need to be defeated.

8 minutes ago, RayC said:

There is simply no deal that these people will support. There is no arrangement with Europe, no matter how benign and non-committal, which (they) would not call surrender". These are the people who need to be defeated.

 

As we are now back under the control of the ECJ, then the deal is neither benign or non commital.

 

What was that ? The author didn't know this, you didn't know this ?
 

Thats the issue with those highly educated remainers. Some of them don't even know the difference between Europe and the EU, or the ECHR or the ECJ.

23 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

As we are now back under the control of the ECJ, then the deal is neither benign or non commital.

 

What was that ? The author didn't know this, you didn't know this ?
 

Thats the issue with those highly educated remainers. Some of them don't even know the difference between Europe and the EU, or the ECHR or the ECJ.

 

Your comment about the use of 'Europe' and 'EU' is pedantic: Moreover, I have not mentioned either the ECHR or the ECJ until this post, and I know the difference.

 

Food sold in the EU will need to meet EU food regulations. Where there is a dispute about EU law, the ECJ - the Supreme Court of the EU - will adjudicate. Are these shocking revelations? Why would the judiciaries from 3rd-country should be involved?

 

You are sniping around the edges. There is nothing of substance in your objections.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.