Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You say you are a scientist eh Simon. Yet you post absolute nonsense (above). I reckon you are just a chancer.

 

A virus is dead cell debris. It is inert. Does not, and cannot cause anything. If it has a role at all, it is probably to aid elimination of dead cells. It is only pathogenic in a computer.

 

As for you believing in the immune system, well I don't. I prefer to believe the body has a defence system. And part of that is a maintenance section, that is working 24/7/365, to keep us in good order. If we look after it, the body can self heal, eliminate undesirable entities and keep all aspects the body in good trim.

 

 

A virus is dead cell debris??!!  Go back to school!  A virus is not and never was a living organism.  It is a pathogen that 'hides' in living cells and replicates when the cell replicates.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

 A large herd of pigs was feeding on the nearby hillside.  The demons begged Jesus, “Send us among the pigs; allow us to go into them.” He gave them permission, and the impure spirits came out and went into the pigs. The herd, about two thousand in number, rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned.

 

"No, ma'am, your husband didn't die of dysentery........he was possessed, therefore we'll have to deny your claim.  Amen!"

Show me the herd of pigs here on AN 😁🐷🐷🐷

Posted

Yes. There are dozens if not hundreds. The poster should grow up and stop using this forum for anti-vax conspiracy  theories. It's not just childish; it's actually dangerous.

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, kwilco said:

...and there you have it! "Ask yourself why this paper isn’t covered by the mainstream media…”
That line is a giant red flag. It’s a tired cliché often used by anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists to prop up dodgy science. If a paper has real merit, it stands up to peer review—not just YouTube comments. The phrase is just a classic deflection. It’s not censorship—it’s usually because the "study" is low-quality, unreviewed, or outright bunk. Real science gets traction through evidence, not echo chambers.

 

The paper is from NEJM, which a prominent pro-vaxxer of this forum has cited as a quality, reliable source in this very thread. If you guys actually put your money where your mouths are, you would read and assess it dispassionately, instead of coming up with increasingly convoluted (and quite frankly, amusing) reasons to preemptively dismiss it.

 

As for media coverage (or lack thereof), you should definitely be asking yourself these critical questions. I'll let the Secretary of Health and Human Services explain it to you. Oh but wait, he's 'insane', isn't he? Can't watch that then, can we? Let's stick to typing "Are vaccines safe?" on Grok!

 

"All the major institutions of our society have been captured by the (medical) industry.

[…]

They advertise because they wanna control the content. If you look at Anderson Cooper or Lester Holt or Jake Tapper, their paycheck is being paid by the network but their salaries are actually coming from pharmaceutical companies, and they know that.

And they know that they've got to toe the line and they've got the frighten us about infectious diseases. They've got to make us all comply with the pharmaceutical mandates, and they're not giving us real news. They're not asking the questions that they ought to be asking. There's no skepticism.

And if you look at these new shows, like twenty years ago, they were saying, yeah, there are problems with vaccines or these other drugs.

They will never do that today."

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
7 hours ago, simon43 said:

 

A virus is dead cell debris??!!  Go back to school!  A virus is not and never was a living organism.  It is a pathogen that 'hides' in living cells and replicates when the cell replicates.

Don't waste your time. The poster you are responding to is an idiot.

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Magictoad said:

Yes. There are dozens if not hundreds. The poster should grow up and stop using this forum for anti-vax conspiracy  theories. It's not just childish; it's actually dangerous.

I have lost count of the "Dr. Kevin Stillwagon says..." threads. Surely the mods could put a stop to the regurgitation.

 

I'm torn between a horsewhip and a lobotomy for people who deliberately spread misinformation.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Approx 1 in 10.000 of all vaccines administered worldwide are 'therapeutic', i.e. meant to treat the symptoms of a disease after it manifested already.  And those approved treatment vaccines are mainly for treating cancers, while experimental and clinical trials are ongoing for other diseases.  The success rate of the approved treatment vaccines is - unsurprisingly - quite low in spite of the billions of $ spend on research in that area.  On reading dr Stillwagon's article you will also understand why. 

 

Also, when people are sick and receive medicine/treatment that cures them they can speak from personal experience.  But it always strikes me that the majority of people that roll up their sleeve for a so-called 'preventive' vaccine (and that's 99,99 % of all vaccines administered) are totally convinced of their beneficial effect.  Big Pharma propaganda has done an amazing job in firmly installing that belief in people, even to such an extent that when the jabbees do get the disease that the vaccine claims to prevent that they then sing to the tune of 'it would have been worse, had I not gotten the shots'.  

Covid-19 being a case in point, with many multi-jabbed people getting Covid every time after their 'protective' booster-jab.  And they are still defending that harmful, ineffective and totally unnecessary practice against the stupid 'anti-vaxxers' that are not part of the jabbee cult.  

See a shrink. 😱

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Dcheech said:
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon, a chiropractor for more than 40 years and a pilot for more than 3 decades who left his career as a pilot due to mask mandates ...


A chiropractor?!!  :coffee1:     Why is it always Chiropractors? 

It's very common for personality traits to closely correlate to their chosen profession.  It may be that chiropractors tend to overestimate the breadth and applicability of their knowledge and consequently stray out of their lane.

 

Wikipedia's definition of chiropractic medicine describes it as based on pseudoscience.  That may be a bit harsh.

 

You'll find a lot of chiropractors on YTube making videos on subjects that are in areas of knowledge that are outside of what they normally study.

Posted
10 hours ago, kwilco said:

OP - what do you think you will achieve?

An early death for him and his followers if his so called reasoning and advice(?) is followed.

Posted
10 hours ago, kwilco said:

OP - what do you think you will achieve?

Hopefully, Red's posts will allow some discussion on the subject. 

Hopefully, it will encourage AN members, and guests, to do some research, before blindly supporting the MSM line.

Hopefully it will lead to better formed medical choices for themselves and their children.

Posted
13 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

The mainstream media in Australia and elsewhere are still continually scare-mongering about 'the latest much more virulent strains that pose lethal risks'.  But the majority of Australians have wised up and will not be conned so easily anymore, and that's one of the main reason behind the 'catastrophical' nosedive of covid-vaccine/boosters uptake (from 95% due to mandates and coercion 3.5 years ago, to a mere 6% now). 

Utter nonsense. The decline in booster uptake is more accurately explained by the transition from pandemic emergency to endemic management, changed risk-benefit calculations, and normal patterns seen with non-mandatory adult vaccinations, rather than widespread rejection of vaccination based on distrust and conspiracy theorists like yourself.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Utter nonsense. The decline in booster uptake is more accurately explained by the transition from pandemic emergency to endemic management, changed risk-benefit calculations, and normal patterns seen with non-mandatory adult vaccinations, rather than widespread rejection of vaccination based on distrust and conspiracy theorists like yourself.


So no need to follow the science and get the recommended boosters?

 

I’d bet that most people who have declined further clot shots have never even heard of the concept of a risk benefit analysis (or the word endemic) and are more likely thinking… 

 

“eff that…..I took their shots and still got sick as a dog!”

 

Of course, the science told us healthy kids were dying of Covid 😅

 

Time to break out the Covid poster children.

 

 

IMG_2683.png

IMG_2685.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...