JAPAN - Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI: "The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die"

[Red Phoenix]

A group of top Japanese lawmakers, medical experts, and investigators has just published an explosive government database covering millions of Covid-vaccinated citizens, and the results are devastating.

The data covers a staggering 18 million citizens, including “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” people.

After reviewing the data, one of Japan’s most highly respected professors - Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI - issued a chilling warning:

“The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”

Alarmingly, the data shows that deaths surge within three to four months of a person receiving an injection.

In the unvaccinated group of citizens, there were no unusual death spikes.

 

 

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/japan-releases-bombshell-data-on

[Red Phoenix]

That stunning news is getting more traction, and well-deserved:

 

Japan Releases Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Data on 18 Million People

On June 15th, a group of brave Japanese truth seekers did what their government wouldn’t—they released a bombshell broadcast exposing vaccine data from over 18 million people.

Journalist Masako Ganaha posted on X: “If the government won’t do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people! Database of 18 million vaccinated people revealed for the first time!” 

< https://x.com/ganaha_masako/status/1934189173621379339 (link in Japanese) > 

The video featured Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, and the Information Disclosure Request Team.

As Dr. Murakami noted, “We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses.”

He added, “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point.”

“This is a key discovery,” he continued. “The more doses, the more the peak shifts, indicating that the toxicity accumulates. The toxicity overlaps, and the more doses you receive, the faster people die.”

Clip via @_aussie17

 

[BLMFem]

Have you considered consulting mental health care professionals? I promise you they won't try to give you any vaccines!

[Red Phoenix]

1 hour ago, BLMFem said:

Have you considered consulting mental health care professionals? I promise you they won't try to give you any vaccines!

Yes, please provide me with the name and contact-details of the mental health care professional you are frequenting, then I can forward those to Prof dr MURAKAMI of Tokyo Science University.

[Stiddle Mump]

Another great post from Red!

 

The data is conclusive. But! It is not a surprise to the enlightened. Just conformation.

 

Wasn't it always obvious that putting toxic filth into yer body would cause problems? It was to me. To make matters worse, the authorities were pushing the jabs onto those that should have been at the back of the queue. The old uns and those with ongoing illnesses.

 

It was all a big lie. the truth will eventually come out into the mainstream.

[Red Phoenix]

And here a link to another article with more info on that Japanese database of 18 million vaccinated people, which shows clear evidence that “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die” (prof dr MURAKAMI). 

 

Source: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/all-vaccines-will-kill-you-japan

 

The data speaks for itself—and the 3 to 4 month spike is impossible to ignore.

 

 

The slow kill bioweapon injections are wreaking such death and destruction that it is finally becoming impossible to ignore. Just as predicted in the Event 201 pandemic exercise, Japan was projected to be one of the first nations to reject a hypothetical vaccine due to their high societal IQ.

Note: Event 201 was the October 2019 organised table-top exercise to simulate what might happen if there was a severe pandemic.  It was a collaboration between the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

[Stiddle Mump]

8 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

And here a link to another article with more info on that Japanese database of 18 million vaccinated people, which shows clear evidence that “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die” (prof dr MURAKAMI). 

 

Source: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/all-vaccines-will-kill-you-japan

 

The data speaks for itself—and the 3 to 4 month spike is impossible to ignore.

 

 

The slow kill bioweapon injections are wreaking such death and destruction that it is finally becoming impossible to ignore. Just as predicted in the Event 201 pandemic exercise, Japan was projected to be one of the first nations to reject a hypothetical vaccine due to their high societal IQ.

Note: Event 201 was the October 2019 organised table-top exercise to simulate what might happen if there was a severe pandemic.  It was a collaboration between the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

I read recently that just 5% of the mRNA batch shots caused 100% of the deaths. I'll dig it out.

 

In the meantime. The link below tells the same story.

 

www.HowBadIsMyBatch.com

[gamb00ler]

Please, for you own safety, check under your bed at least four times a day.

[Mike_Hunt]

15 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

A group of top Japanese lawmakers, medical experts, and investigators has just published an explosive government database covering millions of Covid-vaccinated citizens, and the results are devastating.

The data covers a staggering 18 million citizens, including “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” people.

After reviewing the data, one of Japan’s most highly respected professors - Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI - issued a chilling warning:

“The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”

Alarmingly, the data shows that deaths surge within three to four months of a person receiving an injection.

In the unvaccinated group of citizens, there were no unusual death spikes.

 

 

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/japan-releases-bombshell-data-on

What does the Y Axis represent? 

[Mike_Hunt]

14 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Another great post from Red!

 

The data is conclusive. But! It is not a surprise to the enlightened. Just conformation.

 

Wasn't it always obvious that putting toxic filth into yer body would cause problems? It was to me. To make matters worse, the authorities were pushing the jabs onto those that should have been at the back of the queue. The old uns and those with ongoing illnesses.

 

It was all a big lie. the truth will eventually come out into the mainstream.

What do the numbers on the Y Axis represent? 

[Red Phoenix]

9 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

What does the Y Axis represent? 

The Y-axis on both graphs represents the death rate in each group, i.e. the % of deaths per group over time.

The first graph consisting of two populations: vaxxed and unvaxxed.

The second graphs consisting of four populations with vaxxed people grouped by the final dose they received before death (so 1st, 2nd or 3rd dose) and the unvaxxed.   

[Mike_Hunt]

3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

The Y-axis on both graphs represents the death rate in each group, i.e. the % of deaths per group over time.

The first graph consisting of two populations: vaxxed and unvaxxed.

The second graphs consisting of four populations with vaxxed people grouped by the final dose they received before death (so 1st, 2nd or 3rd dose) and the unvaxxed.   

Like 0.01 percent, 0.02% etc?   It's sloppy to not properly label a graph.  

[Mike_Hunt]

5 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

The Y-axis on both graphs represents the death rate in each group, i.e. the % of deaths per group over time.

The first graph consisting of two populations: vaxxed and unvaxxed.

The second graphs consisting of four populations with vaxxed people grouped by the final dose they received before death (so 1st, 2nd or 3rd dose) and the unvaxxed.   

Why are the non vax people always at 0.01? 

[Mike_Hunt]

Do you were Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI published the methods and raw data? 

[Red Phoenix]

4 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Why are the non vax people always at 0.01? 

Because in the absence of large death-causing factors, mortality rates are very stable, and show very little variation.  Life-insurance companies base their annual premiums and expected pay-out on these very stable mortality rates in the population.    

You cannot argue about death or not-death, and so they are the ultimate yardstick to evaluate impact and effectiveness of population-wide implemented measures to prevent death.  

Ed Dowd - a former Blackrock data analyst - has analysed the mortality rate figures in the US, and did come to exactly same conclusion as the Japanese are now bringing out.  And that is that instead of preventing death, which would result in a slight decrease in mortality rate or a stable trend, that the jabs actually increase the death-rate of those that were jabbed.  

The Japanese database of 18 million people - now also shows that the death-rate not only always increases after being jabbed, but that the more jabs you got the higher the peak in mortality. 

[Nid_Noi]

12 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

The Y-axis on both graphs represents the death rate in each group, i.e. the % of deaths per group over time.

The first graph consisting of two populations: vaxxed and unvaxxed.

The second graphs consisting of four populations with vaxxed people grouped by the final dose they received before death (so 1st, 2nd or 3rd dose) and the unvaxxed.   

‘Maybe we should have another study about people who are injured or disabled for the rest of their lives. The Y-axis camel hump would be much more impressive with no downslope after the initial months.

Edward Dowd had published similar studies after the release of corporate insurance data regarding the 25 to 45 years old vaccinated employees. The data included deaths, partial and total disabilities and sick leaves.

[Red Phoenix]

9 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Do you were Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI published the methods and raw data? 

I don't speak/read Japanese, so I have to rely on translations from people who do.  

But to get the information you ask, I suggest you make use of - the free version of - ChatGPT or another AI-source like Grok, that will be able to provide you with access to the information you are looking for.  And not only that, the AI program can also analyze the data and provide you with the results of any question you ask it.    

However, be weary of the source that the program is using to provide its responses (normally it will add a reference). 

And insist that the program should make use of the actual database figures for its analyses rather than copying what mainstream newspapers tell you, as some of these have an agenda.  

[GanDoonToonPet]

16 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

“The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”

 

...or "The sooner you are likely to die, the more doses you get"

 

Did they control for age? 🤔

 

If not, it's highly likely that older people, being a more vulnerable group, were more likely to be vaccinated or receive multiple shots and, obviously, are more likely to die than younger people.

 

Also, was the vaccine compulsory for everyone in Japan? If not, younger people would be less likely to want or need it.

[Red Phoenix]

1 minute ago, GanDoonToonPet said:

...or "The sooner you are likely to die, the more doses you get"

Did they control for age? 🤔

If not, it's highly likely that older people, being a more vulnerable group, were more likely to be vaccinated or receive multiple shots and, obviously, are more likely to die than younger people.

Good and relevant question. 

The english-language articles I posted with the conclusions provided by prof dr MURAKAMI do not mention that aspect.  

Now I would presume that an eminent professor will have taken that aspect into account as it is essential to make any meaningful conclusions about the data.  But also here a ChatGPT or other AI-tool query will provide the answer (I expect that in the Japanese paper by prof MURAKAMI that he mentioned it, but that the english-language articles only summarized the main findings). 

[cdemundo]

Often there is an alternate explanation.

 

If doses are 6 months apart, every dose you get you are 6 months older, 6 months closer to your expiration date.

 

So yes, for sure "you are more likely to die" the older you get.

 

Just a thought.

[soalbundy]

37 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Because in the absence of large death-causing factors, mortality rates are very stable, and show very little variation.  Life-insurance companies base their annual premiums and expected pay-out on these very stable mortality rates in the population.    

You cannot argue about death or not-death, and so they are the ultimate yardstick to evaluate impact and effectiveness of population-wide implemented measures to prevent death.  

Ed Dowd - a former Blackrock data analyst - has analysed the mortality rate figures in the US, and did come to exactly same conclusion as the Japanese are now bringing out.  And that is that instead of preventing death, which would result in a slight decrease in mortality rate or a stable trend, that the jabs actually increase the death-rate of those that were jabbed.  

The Japanese database of 18 million people - now also shows that the death-rate not only always increases after being jabbed, but that the more jabs you got the higher the peak in mortality. 

Due to a mix up I got 5 doses but I'm still here.

[Red Phoenix]

19 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Often there is an alternate explanation.

If doses are 6 months apart, every dose you get you are 6 months older, 6 months closer to your expiration date.

So yes, for sure "you are more likely to die" the older you get.

Just a thought.

The very real phenomenon that you mention, will have a slight effect but does not explain the up to 5 times higher mortality-rate at the peak of the 'camel hump' (approx 3 months after last jab).  

After approx 270 days, the graph shows that the mortality rates of vaxxed and unvaxxed are approx same and stable again. 

So the jabbed increased death-effect wanes after approx 9 months. 

[Stiddle Mump]

38 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Often there is an alternate explanation.

 

If doses are 6 months apart, every dose you get you are 6 months older, 6 months closer to your expiration date.

 

So yes, for sure "you are more likely to die" the older you get.

 

Just a thought.

The whole thing, covid, 5G and the experimental vaxxes are hugely complex.  

 

The different batches of the vaxxes, where some were relatively harmless, while others were deadly, is one of the key aspects. Why were prominent people not given a jab from a hot batch?

 

It has to be remembered that this whole thing was a carefully planned assault on the people. Why? In my view, for the short time anyway, was to usher in thousands, and thousands, of 5G towers. Why? With the end game being absolute control. Covid was a stepping stone along the pathway. As is the assault on Iran, the demonization of both Russia and China. There is also the WHO involvement. The push for digital dosh. ETC.

 

What's it all about? Because it's the end of an era is coming. The 500 years of European domination is swiftly coming to an end. This is a wounded animal lashing out. In 25 years time it will be impossible to control the 'others'. Now is the time. Hence the world turmoil. The human race is on the edge of the cliff.

[Red Phoenix]

12 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

Due to a mix up I got 5 doses but I'm still here.

Good for you that you are still alive and kicking, and I mean that honestly.  

Two questions: 

1 - Did you experience any adverse effects in the days/weeks/months after being jabbed?

2 - Would you roll up your sleeve again for a 6th Covid mRNA-jab? 

[soalbundy]

6 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

Good for you that you are still alive and kicking, and I mean that honestly.  

Two questions: 

1 - Did you experience any adverse effects in the days/weeks/months after being jabbed?

2 - Would you roll up your sleeve again for a 6th Covid mRNA-jab? 

No to both questions. I'm not against vaccinations per se but I find the dangers of covid to be exaggerated.

[Quentin Zen]

1,000 Sinovac shots is equivalent to three glasses of lukewarm water mixed with Cherry Coke left outside for 11.4 days

[Red Phoenix]

56 minutes ago, GanDoonToonPet said:

Also, was the vaccine compulsory for everyone in Japan? If not, younger people would be less likely to want or need it.

 

Looked it up and there are clear differences in COVID‑19 mRNA vaccine uptake across age groups in Japan.

Here's a breakdown based on data through 2023–2024:

---

🧓 Older adults (65+)

• Highest uptake, around 90% fully vaccinated (two doses) as of October 2023

• Booster rates are also highest in this group, though precise percentages vary by prefecture.

👩‍🔧 Middle‑aged adults (40–64)

• Very high uptake — approximately 85%

• They also had strong booster uptake due to workplace initiatives and health risk awareness.

🧑 Working-age younger adults (20–39)

• Slightly lower uptake than middle-aged; around 70–80% fully vaccinated by late 2023.

• Hesitancy stemmed from perception of low personal risk.

👶 Adolescents/Teens (12–19)

• Lower still — about 65–75% fully vaccinated by 2023.

• Uptake depended heavily on parental consent and school-based programs.

👧 Children under 12

• Lowest uptake, around 30–60% with at least one dose by late 2023.

• Strong parental hesitation due to concerns over side effects.

 

> My conclusion: Compared with other countries, the Covid-19 mRNA-vaccine uptake in Japan was very high.

And the differences in covid mRNA-vaccine uptake across age categories are not of such magnitude, that they can explain the up to 5 times higher mortality-rate at the peak of the 'camel hump' (approx 3 months after last jab).  

[gamb00ler]

1 hour ago, GanDoonToonPet said:

Did they control for age? 🤔

 

If not, it's highly likely that older people, being a more vulnerable group, were more likely to be vaccinated or receive multiple shots and, obviously, are more likely to die than younger people.

 

Also, was the vaccine compulsory for everyone in Japan? If not, younger people would be less likely to want or need it.

You've identified several of the weaknesses of observational studies.  The anti-vaxers think that a study is a study and that all are equally capable of identifying causal relationships.  They don't realize that this type of study has serious drawbacks.  Here is what AI lists as the top two weaknesses of observational trials:

 

 

Here's a more detailed look at the limitations:

 

1. Causality:

Observational studies observe naturally occurring events, meaning researchers don't manipulate variables to determine cause and effect.

This makes it difficult to establish whether one factor directly influences another, as other factors might be at play. 

2. Bias and Confounding:

Confounding: Confounding occurs when a third variable influences both the exposure and the outcome, making it difficult to isolate the effect of the exposure. 

These issues can lead to inaccurate conclusions about the relationship between variables. 

Bias: Observational studies can be influenced by various biases, such as selection bias (participants are not randomly selected), information bias (differences in how information is collected), and measurement errors. 

 

In the Japanese 'study' the most glaring weakness is selection bias.

Another weakness is that no attempt is made to control some of the factors that may or may not influence the outcomes.  Without such control the influencing factors will muddy the results.

[gamb00ler]

21 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

No to both questions. I'm not against vaccinations per se but I find the dangers of covid to be exaggerated.

Please explain how do you know if the dangers were exaggerated?  Did you have a control group dispersed amongst the general population and then months later do a thorough analysis?  Otherwise.... you're just attempting to fabricate an accurate generalization from a sample of one.

[impulse]

9 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

In the Japanese 'study' the most glaring weakness is selection bias.

 

How was it biased?