Jump to content

Marijuana use dramatically increases risk of dying from heart attacks and stroke, large stud


Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

It has nothing to do with CNN.

Every other channel could publish this study eg Fox news 

 

Did they?.

 

Are you aware of how much money big pharma pumps into MSM TV

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Naive or a fool?

 

Screenshot_2025-06-19-21-24-48-23_3aea4af51f236e4932235fdada7d1643.jpg

Don't see the words "Pfizer" or "CNN" mentioned, just a general AI Answer on Pharma advertising. So Pfizer is also  financing Fox News or any of the other TV Channels.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, UWEB said:

Don't see the words "Pfizer" or "CNN" mentioned, just a general AI Answer on Pharma advertising. So Pfizer is also  financing Fox News or any of the other TV Channels.

 

I guess my question still stands. Naive or a fool? You've been proven wrong and now you're just mincing words

 

I had fed a general question into ai and received the general answer. If you really want to know the score then just dig deep into it. But you never want to do that cuz you might learn something in the process.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KhaoHom said:

 

I guess my question still stands. Naive or a fool? You've been proven wrong and now you're just mincing words

 

I had a general question into ai and received the general answer. If you really want to know the score then just dig deep into it. But you never want to do that cuz you might learn something in the process.

I don't need to dig deeper to proof your nonsense.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, UWEB said:

I don't need to dig deeper to proof your nonsense.

 

That would apparently be PROVE. It's a horrible sentence as well...

 

That's an especially weak retort. You're obviously too lazy to go search out the information that you claim you're interested in. Meaning - you have no interest in the truth. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Celsius said:

So does that Indian quasi doctor still work for them? He was the one pushing Marijuana 

 

Why would a Serbian refugee to Canada describe a US citizen as an "Indian", unless one was attempting to denigrate the person based upon ethnic origin?  Dr. Gupta was born in Michigan and was educated in the USA. He is a qualified pediatric neurosurgeon and teaches at Emory Medical School. He is not a "quasi" doctor.  He still practices medicine. His position on cannabis is that it may be helpful for some patients under certain conditions and that it warrants additional research and investigation. He has never "pushed" marijuana.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

That would apparently be PROVE. It's a horrible sentence as well...

 

That's an especially weak retort. You're obviously too lazy to go search out the information that you claim you're interested in. Meaning - you have no interest in the truth. 

OK I've  searched and have got an astonishing answer, the Pope is a catholic.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Why would a Serbian refugee to Canada describe a US citizen as an "Indian", unless one was attempting to denigrate the person based upon ethnic origin?  Dr. Gupta was born in Michigan and was educated in the USA. He is a qualified pediatric neurosurgeon and teaches at Emory Medical School. He is not a "quasi" doctor.  He still practices medicine. His position on cannabis is that it may be helpful for some patients under certain conditions and that it warrants additional research and investigation. He has never "pushed" marijuana.

 

You are a western refugee in Thailand which is a lot worse 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

do you think a pharmaceutical company wants people smoking weed instead of using their drugs? 

 

Probably yes, as based on this study smoking weed leads to ill health and that's where they can really rack up the bucks via health insurance & government health systems 🤷‍♂️

 

Or are you suggesting a ban on weed will force stoners to rush to the pharmacy/doctor to get something else prescribed ?

 

It's not really a great leap of faith to believe that smoking weed has negative health effects is it ? 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, RSD1 said:

The reality is, if everyone ditched alcohol and cigarettes and switched to cannabis, especially non-smoking forms, the world would be far better off and in many more ways than one.

The reality is all of it is toxic, the more intake the higher the toxicity. Why do any of it when having a clear mind and body is better than being fogged up.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
7 hours ago, RSD1 said:

I honestly don’t know why anyone even wastes time focusing on these negative studies about cannabis use. The percentage of people who die from cardiovascular issues linked to cannabis is microscopic. Meanwhile, cigarettes and alcohol pose an exponentially greater risk of high blood pressure, heart disease, lung disease, liver disease and stroke, and yet most people in the world regularly consume one or both without a second thought.

Cigarettes, alcohol and overeating.

Food is probably the No1 cause of death to western people.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, novacova said:

The reality is all of it is toxic, the more intake the higher the toxicity. Why do any of it when having a clear mind and body is better than being fogged up.

I've not found a better way to cure my arthritis.

 

Posted

"Smoking" anything - combusting materials and chemicals and inhaling the smoke is likely bad for one's health.

 

There are other ways to consume cannabis that may be healthier - edibles, dry-herb vaping.

 

 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

There are other ways to consume cannabis that may be healthier - edibles, dry-herb vaping.

Well, vaping is most toxic

Posted
1 minute ago, newbee2022 said:

Well, vaping is most toxic

 

Dry-herb vaping of cannabis flower is "most toxic"?

 

I don't think so.

 

All you inhale/consume is vapor and THC - assuming you've got the temp properly adjusted.

 

The referenced study clearly mentions that methods of consumption were not recorded, and that most participants were smoking cannabis flower.

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

I've not found a better way to cure my arthritis.

 

In the mid 70’s I had a friend with debilitating arthritis that advanced rapidly within about six months he went from walking without any aid to crutches then bed ridden. He smoked a lot of dope and it helped alleviate the pain but it didn’t cure the condition. 

Posted
50 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

There are other ways to consume cannabis that may be healthier - edibles, dry-herb vaping.

The operative word here, healthier. Not healthy. Or maybe not as unhealthy.

  • Thumbs Down 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...