BREAKING NEWS Trump Confirms Surprise US Airstrikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites, Including Fordo

[dinsdale]

1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

The IAEA had actually found particles at 83.7% and that was back in 2023 at Fordo one of the 3 nuclear sites bombed.

 

UN report says uranium particles enriched up to 83.7 percent found in Iran

 Inspectors from the United Nations nuclear watchdog found uranium particles enriched up to 83.7 percent in Iran’s underground Fordo nuclear site, a report seen Tuesday by The Associated Press said.

The confidential quarterly report by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency distributed to member states likely will renew tensions between Iran and the West over its program.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/un-report-says-uranium-particles-enriched-up-to-83-7-percent-found-in-iran

Wow! Very concerning especially if it's not all destroyed or they've managed to move some. 83.7% is basically there. 

[SunnyinBangrak]

1 minute ago, BLMFem said:

And you should really stop trolling posters with your "hating America" drivel. We all know who ran from the US and spends every day hating on it.

Ellen Degeneres & Rosie O'Donnell and a few other sufferers of it, but can't see the relevence to this thread of fleeing hatefilled leftists?

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Defining danger in this context is very simple. And are you telling me you can "finish the job" without boots on the ground? Well, if you've found a way you should tell the Joint Chiefs, I'm sure they would be massively interested.

And you should really stop trolling posters with your "hating America" drivel. We all know who ran from the US and spends every day hating on it.

And you should really stop trolling posters with your ran from the US and spends every day hating on it drivel. 

 

You get that pearl neckless wiped off? 

[stevenl]

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I do not believe there are significant "...conflicting opinions within the Trump Administration was to whether Iran was actually developing nuclear weapons capability,"

 

So her testimony in march to Congress saying she believed iran was not developing nuclear weapons doesn't count?

[Yagoda]

10 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

We all know who ran from the US and spends every day hating on it.

Who?

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, stevenl said:

So her testimony in march to Congress saying she believed iran was not developing nuclear weapons doesn't count?

yawn, head to the previous topic where that was discussed over and over with her transcript and latest statements about the fake news media

[ThreeCardMonte]

6 bunker busters.  
 

When in doubt, OVERLOAD!

 

 

 

[Tug]

7 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Get a grip. This was a limited target specific event. Nuclear risks were reduced.

You misunderstand I’m all for Iran not having nukes what I’m referring to is the great possibility of a protracted war that will go on for years that’s sad 😞 I wish trump hadn’t squandered the other option,we wouldn’t be here now.I doubt they would have been supplying Russia with weapons or would have given hammas the go ahead to attack Israel.they wouldn’t have risked going back on sanctions…..at least we wouldn't have squandered that chip.now the only solution is war,that’s sad 😞 I sincerely hope it’s a short one with a successful conclusion ie regime change and no nukes for Iran.

[ThreeCardMonte]

2 hours ago, transam said:

Ooooh, that ol' chestnut that you had nothing to do with.........😂

 

And the USA should not forget it was formed by mainly mass immigration from Europe, including Germans.........................😆

And we’re still speaking English.

 

If not for the USA coming to your aid in two, not one world wars you would be speaking German.

 

The Germans who immigrated to the USA were not our enemy.

[Purdey]

No one is surprised it seems that the President's commitment that the Republicans would not start a war, that the President would negotiate peace, would crumple under the Israel flag to start yet another war in the middle east.

As the jedi said, The hypocrisy is strong in this one.

[ThreeCardMonte]

1 hour ago, jvs said:

Really ,clearly you went to school in the US, i do not say you were educated.

How did you do in history class? Not very well i am sure.

If it was not for the Germans you would still be paying tax to the Uk and you would have a real king,not a fake one.

Oh and one other thing,the US was built by Europeans. If not for immigrants from Europe there would be no US at all!

Oh, i see you are not playing with a full deck,understandable but you should not make a fool of yourself on so many occasions.

Get your facts straight!

 

A Karen had her feelings hurt.

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So her testimony in march to Congress saying she believed iran was not developing nuclear weapons doesn't count?

I do not think one out of context line from one individual makes for significant "...conflicting opinions within the Trump Administration was to whether Iran was actually developing nuclear weapons capability,", but you go ahead and believe what you like brother. 

[jvs]

59 minutes ago, DezLez said:

I suggest you do so by explaining the above.

All what i said it easy to verify by checking the internet.

I was taught this in school when i was 12.

That is awhile ago.

What i was responding to was just an uneducated smear,if he thinks he is so superior he should come with facts and not lies.

[Bkk Brian]

1 minute ago, Purdey said:

No one is surprised it seems that the President's commitment that the Republicans would not start a war, that the President would negotiate peace, would crumple under the Israel flag to start yet another war in the middle east.

As the jedi said, The hypocrisy is strong in this one.

Let us know when a war starts or is declared

[jvs]

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

A Karen had her feelings hurt.

No,not at all!

People like you can only make me smile,stupid people like you do not deserve credit or respect!

Just between you and i,did you Google it? lol.

[Yagoda]

Per the Joint Chief of staff right now: Operation Midnight Hammer involved 7 bombers in an 18 hour flight, escorted by Israeli fighters, and 24 Tomahawks launched from a sub. The Israeli fighters took out any potential AD threats. 14 MOPs were dropped.

[dinsdale]

5 minutes ago, Purdey said:

No one is surprised it seems that the President's commitment that the Republicans would not start a war, that the President would negotiate peace, would crumple under the Israel flag to start yet another war in the middle east.

As the jedi said, The hypocrisy is strong in this one.

Israel started the war. Trumps come in to try and deny Iran having nukes. Do you want Iran to have nukes?

[ThreeCardMonte]

2 minutes ago, jvs said:

No,not at all!

People like you can only make me smile,stupid people like you do not deserve credit or respect!

Just between you and i,did you Google it? lol.

Keep smiling happy face.

[simple1]

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Not yet, but much higher than what is needed for peaceful purposes,

Oh, so you think they're kidding. 

I do not believe there are significant "...conflicting opinions within the Trump Administration was to whether Iran was actually developing nuclear weapons capability,"

 

"On May 31, 2025, IAEA reported that Iran had sharply increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% purity, just below weapons-grade, reaching over 408 kilograms, a nearly 50% rise since February. The agency warned that this amount is enough for multiple nuclear weapons if further enriched."

 

"In June 2025, the NCRI said Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons through a new program called the "Kavir Plan". According to the NCRI, the new project involves six sites in Semnan province working on warheads and related technology, succeeding the previous AMAD Project"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran#:~:text=On May 31%2C 2025%2C IAEA,nuclear weapons if further enriched.

 

First of all let's not forget the world wouldn't be facing the current scenario if Trump had not unilaterally withdrawn from the P5+1 Agreement.

 

What do you suppose the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is?  I would assume as a defensive measure, negotiating tool, or maybe energy / R&D.

 

Iran cannot currently reach US with ICBM. In any case it's currently estimated it would take Iran 2/5 years to develop a suitable guidance system. IMO the  only real danger is if Iran puts in place a real zealot believer in  The End of Times; same could equally apply if Christiaan zealot came to power in the US.

 

I would be very wary of any claims by NCRI , they remind me of the Iraqi group who fooled the US into attacking Iraq.

 

Some reading material for you...

 

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-irans-nuclear-ambition/ksi53aux2

 

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-20-june-2025

[jvs]

2 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Keep smiling happy face.

 

[Yagoda]

2 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

First of all let's not forget the world wouldn't be facing the current scenario if Trump had not unilaterally withdrawn from the P5+1 Agreement.

 

What do you suppose the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is?  I would assume as a defensive measure, negotiating tool, or maybe energy / R&D.

 

Iran cannot currently reach US with ICBM. In any case it's currently estimated it would take Iran 2/5 years to develop a suitable guidance system. IMO the  only real danger is if Iran puts in place a real zealot believer in  The End of Times; same could equally apply if Christiaan zealot came to power in the US.

 

I would be very wary of any claims by NCRI , they remind me of the Iraqi group who fooled the US into attacking Iraq.

 

Some reading material for you...

 

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-irans-nuclear-ambition/ksi53aux2

 

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-20-june-2025

Sucks to be Iran then.

[Social Media]

UPDATE: Pentagon Briefing:

 

Pentagon briefing on 'Operation Midnight Hammer' | U.S used deception tactics to hit Iran: Pentagon (more to follow)

 

Pentagon briefing on 'Operation Midnight Hammer' | U.S used deception tactics to hit Iran: Pentagon#Iran #Israel #US #IsraeliranWar #IranIsraelConflict #IranVsIsrael | @suyeshasavant pic.twitter.com/hYSqFP7Igz

— IndiaToday (@IndiaToday) June 22, 2025

 

[DezLez]

15 minutes ago, jvs said:

All what i said it easy to verify by checking the internet.

I was taught this in school when i was 12.

That is awhile ago.

What i was responding to was just an uneducated smear,if he thinks he is so superior he should come with facts and not lies.

I still have no idea what you are talking about!

[hotsun]

9 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

First of all let's not forget the world wouldn't be facing the current scenario if Trump had not unilaterally withdrawn from the P5+1 Agreement.

 

What do you suppose the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is?  I would assume as a defensive measure, negotiating tool, or maybe energy / R&D.

 

Iran cannot currently reach US with ICBM. In any case it's currently estimated it would take Iran 2/5 years to develop a suitable guidance system. IMO the  only real danger is if Iran puts in place a real zealot believer in  The End of Times; same could equally apply if Christiaan zealot came to power in the US.

 

I would be very wary of any claims by NCRI , they remind me of the Iraqi group who fooled the US into attacking Iraq.

 

Some reading material for you...

 

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-irans-nuclear-ambition/ksi53aux2

 

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-20-june-2025

I promise to read those after you apologize for posting that amnesty international garbage propaganda

[dinsdale]

To all those that were saying bunker busters were not confirmed as being used well there you go. Confirmed. 14 of them. Also being said by Hegsath the US acted in self defence to protect the US, US personnel and interests and Israel which is exactly what I have previously posted and got the old thumbs down from a couple of morons. They were surgical strikes and do not constitute going to war. I'll accept apologies from anyone who has the balls to say they were WRONG.

[Tug]

2 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

The USA is the main reason you’re not speaking German today.

 

The Poms should never forget that fact.

Waaa off topic but I feel compelled to respond….I believe you are mistaken you are ignoring the fact of Germany fighting a 2 front war. the brave resilient Russian people killed 80% of germanys soldiers ran them out of more territory than the rest of the allied forces.all stop 🛑 and yes all the allied forces contributed but keep in mind if Germany had been able to focus on defense without the Russian invasion and consequences it may have been different.I hope this war is over quickly with a successful conclusion.

[hotsun]

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Waaa off topic but I feel compelled to respond….I believe you are mistaken you are ignoring the fact of Germany fighting a 2 front war. the brave resilient Russian people killed 80% of germanys soldiers ran them out of more territory than the rest of the allied forces.all stop 🛑 and yes all the allied forces contributed but keep in mind if Germany had been able to focus on defense without the Russian invasion and consequences it may have been different.I hope this war is over quickly with a successful conclusion.

But if its over quick and successful that means that trump is a hero and we cant have that can we

[NanLaew]

33 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

34 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So her testimony in march to Congress saying she believed iran was not developing nuclear weapons doesn't count?

yawn, head to the previous topic where that was discussed over and over with her transcript and latest statements about the fake news media

 

yawn, so why did Donald Trump need to tell the press LAST FRIDAY that she was wrong LAST MARCH?

 

Insert fake news media here: In March, Gabbard testified in front of Congress that the intelligence community [IC] “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader [Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003. The IC continues to monitor, closely, if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program."

 

https://time.com/7296421/trump-public-rebuke-tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-statement/

[Bkk Brian]

4 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

yawn, so why did Donald Trump need to tell the press LAST FRIDAY that she was wrong LAST MARCH?

 

Insert fake news media here: In March, Gabbard testified in front of Congress that the intelligence community [IC] “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader [Ali] Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003. The IC continues to monitor, closely, if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program."

 

https://time.com/7296421/trump-public-rebuke-tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-weapon-statement/

Like I said, already discussed in previous topic:

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1364216-trump-to-make-decision-on-us-involvement-within-two-weeks/page/3/#findComment-19887989

 

The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.

My full testimony below:

[NanLaew]

2 hours ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

The USA is the main reason you’re not speaking German today.

 

The Poms should never forget that fact.

 

A disturbingly large number of Americans smugly repeat this insulting trope, diminishing French heroism and exaggerating their own singular role in liberation. I guess you are just another one. You can be forgiven if you think it's new, I guess ignorance can be a blessing.

 

But yes, that's EXACTLY how Leavitt shot her credibility in the foot when she smilingly trotted that old canard out at a White House press briefing like she had stumbled across something so new and gob smackingly shockingly unknown that it would silence the floor.

 

When you roll your eyes, it doesn't make a sound.