Report Push for Gender Recognition Law Following Same-Sex Marriage Milestone

[snoop1130]

Photo courtesy of Tovima

 

Thailand is at a crucial juncture in its journey towards LGBTQI+ equality following the historic legalisation of same-sex marriage. Advocates are now pressing the government to expedite the enactment of a gender recognition law, marking this as the next step in securing comprehensive rights for the community.

 

People’s Party MP Tunyawaj Kamolwongwat, Vice-Chair of the House Committee on Children, Youth, Women, Older Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Ethnic Groups, and LGBTI+, emphasized the urgency of this mission during a recent panel discussion. Addressing the audience at the Law Out Loud event during the Bangkok Post Pride in Action forum, held at Lido Connect in Siam Square, Tunyawaj stated, “Gender recognition is our next mission.”

 

The event, which took place on June 25, was part of the celebrations for Pride Month. It featured Thailand’s largest-ever Pride Parade, which kicked off on June 1 with a 200-metre rainbow flag procession from National Stadium to the Ratchaprasong intersection in Bangkok. The parade highlighted the increasing visibility and participation of the LGBTQI+ community across the country.

 

Despite the milestone of legalising same-sex marriage, Tunyawaj pointed out that the topic of gender recognition was previously dismissed in Parliament due to widespread misunderstanding of its importance. This law is crucial for transgender individuals who face significant challenges when their official gender designations, such as Mr or Miss, do not align with their gender identity. These complications often arise in everyday situations like passing through immigration checkpoints.

 

Currently, the proposed bill is slowly advancing as it requires collaboration among various government agencies and revisions to existing laws and regulations, making the process cumbersome.

 

Advocates argue that broader legal reforms are necessary to dismantle systemic barriers. Tunyawaj specifically noted the age requirement for same-sex couples—who must be at least 25 years old to marry—and the need for transgender individuals to secure a psychiatrist’s approval for legal gender changes. These requirements are seen as significant obstacles to personal dignity and autonomy.

 

Education plays a vital role in these reforms. Tunyawaj stressed the need for young people to be educated on LGBTQI+ issues and inclusivity, which is essential for implementing the Anti-Discrimination Bill. This legislation aims to protect LGBTQI+ individuals from discriminatory practices.

 

Nareeluc Pairchaiyapoom, Director of the International Human Rights Division at the Ministry of Justice, shared her insights on the challenging process of legalising same-sex marriage. When initially proposed, the bill faced skepticism and ridicule. However, its eventual enactment brought immense joy and marked a significant victory for the community.

 

The Marriage Equality Act, which took effect on January 22, grants same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples. These rights include adoption, property management, inheritance, divorce, access to state welfare if one partner is a civil servant, and eligibility for tax deductions.

 

While celebrating this progress, Nareeluc highlighted the ongoing necessity of fostering social inclusion and awareness. To promote acceptance of LGBTQI+ individuals, the Ministry of Justice is collaborating with the Ministry of Education to launch nationwide campaigns aimed at increasing awareness and acceptance.

 

The road to complete equality and acceptance in Thailand is ongoing. The push for a gender recognition law is not just about aligning documents with identities; it's about ensuring dignity, autonomy, and respect for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity. As the nation makes strides in legal reforms, the focus remains on building a more inclusive society where every person is valued and protected under the law.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Thaiger 2025-06-26

 

 

[bg53]

I'm okay with LGBTQ but not okay with all the activism.

[Jingthing]

17 minutes ago, bg53 said:

I'm okay with LGBTQ but not okay with all the activism.

Poor poor pitiful you.

[cjinchiangrai]

12 minutes ago, bg53 said:

I'm okay with LGBTQ but not okay with all the activism.

There really isn't any activism. Nobody is grooming kids to be gay or trans, it just happens. The "gay agenda" was invented as a strawman to promote the fascist agenda. 

[zmisha]

Women's rights are largely based on the fact that they do irreplaceable hard work for society - they produce children.
It turns out that a man who glues his breasts to himself will receive the same privileges without giving birth to a single child.
Is this fair?

[Jingthing]

Just now, zmisha said:

Women's rights are largely based on the fact that they do irreplaceable hard work for society - they produce children.
It turns out that a man who glues his breasts to himself will receive the same privileges without giving birth to a single child.
Is this fair?

Rights are based on people being human beings.

You're just trying to foment hatred towards others.

Disgusting!

[zmisha]

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Rights are based on people being human beings.

You're just trying to foment hatred towards others.

Disgusting!

Your rights are someone else's responsibilities. Therefore, it is strange to think that all the other people owe you something.

[saakura]

I see that an "I" has been added and it is now LGBTQI. The list keeps getting longer. What category does the "I" represent?

[Jingthing]

4 minutes ago, zmisha said:

Your rights are someone else's responsibilities. Therefore, it is strange to think that all the other people owe you something.

What are you even talking about. 

In what way is a Gender Recognition Law any kind of burder on you?

 

[angryguy]

24 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There really isn't any activism

Yes there is

 

24 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Nobody is grooming kids to be gay or trans

Yes they are

 

24 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

it just happens

No it doesnt

[Jingthing]

Just now, saakura said:

I see that an "I" has been added and it is now LGBTQI. The list keeps getting longer. What category does the "I" represent?

Intersex I suppose.

There isn't such a thing as an "official" version of the letters.

[saakura]

Just now, Jingthing said:

Intersex I suppose.

There isn't such a thing as an "official" version of the letters.

I read it again, it actually says LGBTQI+, so I presume the + indicates more categories will be added. 

[Jingthing]

Just now, saakura said:

I read it again, it actually says LGBTQI+, so I presume the + indicates more categories will be added. 

Again there is no international council of letters. Different versions are valid. The general idea is easily understood.

[Jingthing]

Lobbying for civil rights under the law is activism. That should be admired by all decent fair minded people.

[cjinchiangrai]

6 minutes ago, angryguy said:

Yes there is

 

Yes they are

 

No it doesnt

Well every gay and trans person I know would disagree. 

[cjinchiangrai]

17 minutes ago, zmisha said:

Women's rights are largely based on the fact that they do irreplaceable hard work for society - they produce children.
It turns out that a man who glues his breasts to himself will receive the same privileges without giving birth to a single child.
Is this fair?

Since everyone should have EQUAL RIGHTS, is it fair that you are trying to deny rights to anyone?

[zmisha]

6 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Since everyone should have EQUAL RIGHTS, is it fair that you are trying to deny rights to anyone?

If rights are equal but duties are unequal, is that fair? It resembles communism.

[dinsdale]

40 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

There really isn't any activism. Nobody is grooming kids to be gay or trans, it just happens. The "gay agenda" was invented as a strawman to promote the fascist agenda. 

And what do you have to say about hormone blockers being given to children? As for nobody is grooming...

[cjinchiangrai]

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

And what do you have to say about hormone blockers being given to children? As for nobody is grooming...

That is between the doctors and the parents.

 

How many drag queens have assaulted children on their book days? How many priests on theirs?

[cjinchiangrai]

5 minutes ago, zmisha said:

If rights are equal but duties are unequal, is that fair? It resembles communism.

Don't show this to your wife. Valuing mens and womens work differently is the whole point of feminism.

[Peabody]

11 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

And what do you have to say about hormone blockers being given to children? As for nobody is grooming...

Off topic

 

[dinsdale]

18 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

That is between the doctors and the parents.

 

How many drag queens have assaulted children on their book days? How many priests on theirs?

A) Doctors and parents shouldn't have the right to interfere with their children's gender. Once a person is considered an adult then they can do what they like. As for when they are children it's child abuse pure and simple. B) Who mentioned assaulting children. Grooming was the point and you stated this doesn't happen. Drag queens reading stories to children about being gay or trans or a drag queen or whatever is IMHO grooming.

[dinsdale]

4 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Off topic

 

I responded to a post saying activism doesn't exist and neither does grooming. If you say my comment is off topic then surely the post I commented on is also off topic yet you failed to call that post off topic. Either both are off topic or neither.

[cjinchiangrai]

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

A) Doctors and parents shouldn't have the right to interfere with children's gender. Once a person is considered an adult then they can do what they like. As for when they are children it's child abuse pure and simple. B) Who mentioned assaulting children. Grooming was the point and you stated this doesn't happen. Drag queens reading stories to children about being gay or trans or a drag queen or whatever is IMHO grooming.

Why? What authorizes the state to contradict the parents over medical care?

 

The picture was chosen to sell the illusion that kids are being groomed. They are, but not by drag queens. I was just responding.

[dinsdale]

1 minute ago, cjinchiangrai said:

What authorizes the state to contradict the parents over medical care?

 

Starting the process of gender reassignment by using hormone blockers on children is not medical care and should be outlawed.

[cjinchiangrai]

21 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Starting the process of gender reassignment by using hormone blockers on children is not medical care and should be outlawed.

Says who? Hormones sounds like a job for an endocrinologist to me.

[Peabody]

36 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

A) Doctors and parents shouldn't have the right to interfere with their children's gender. Once a person is considered an adult then they can do what they like. As for when they are children it's child abuse pure and simple. B) Who mentioned assaulting children. Grooming was the point and you stated this doesn't happen. Drag queens reading stories to children about being gay or trans or a drag queen or whatever is IMHO grooming.

Awww, did the scary drag queen try to enter your personal space?

[Bday Prang]

1 hour ago, saakura said:

I see that an "I" has been added and it is now LGBTQI. The list keeps getting longer. What category does the "I" represent?

incel ?

[bg53]

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Poor poor pitiful you.

 

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

You're just trying to foment hatred towards others.

Disgusting!

 

If activism in the west is a good point of reference, it does not stop at "we want respect." It goes on to foment hatred for anybody who disagrees and demands privilege.

[cjinchiangrai]

2 minutes ago, bg53 said:

 

 

If activism in the west is a good point of reference, it does not stop at "we want respect." It goes on to foment hatred for anybody who disagrees and demands privilege.

Privilege or the same rights that you have?