Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Targets BBC With $1 Billion Claim Over Documentary

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

image.png

 

Donald Trump is threatening the BBC with a hefty $1bn (approximately 36 billion Baht) lawsuit over allegations that a speech he made was improperly edited in a documentary. This follows a leaked memo from former BBC adviser Michael Prescott, which claims that the Panorama program distorted Trump's words to suggest he incited the Capitol Hill riots. Trump's legal team is demanding the retraction of the documentary, an official apology, and full compensation.

 

The broadcast of the controversial edits before the last US election sparked significant backlash. The memo emphasises that the corporation pieced parts of Trump's speech together, thereby altering its original intent. As a consequence, BBC director general Tim Davie and CEO of news Deborah Turness have stepped down.

 

The legal demands come as Trump’s representatives pressure the broadcaster for a swift resolution. They caution that without compliance, Trump will vigorously pursue the legal route, aiming to secure $1bn in damages. BBC chair Samir Shah has acknowledged the editing mishandling as an error of judgement, but further action from the corporation remains pending, reported the BBC.

 

The BBC is yet to publicly address the threat of legal repercussions or outline their next steps. Meanwhile, Tim Davie is scheduled to address employees in an all-staff call tomorrow amid the mounting crisis. Legal experts suggest that the case could significantly impact editorial practices at news organisations if it proceeds.

 

 

 

  • Donald Trump threatens the BBC with a $1bn (36 billion Baht) lawsuit over alleged speech editing.
  • BBC's top executives, Tim Davie and Deborah Turness, have resigned in the wake of the controversy.
  • The BBC is yet to respond to legal demands from Trump's team.

 

Related Storiy:

BBC Leaders Step Down Over Controversial Trump Footage

 

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-11-11

 

image.jpeg

 

image.png

  • Replies 180
  • Views 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

A letter from Trump attorney Alejandro Brito demands the BBC “retract the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements,” apologize and “appropriately compensate President Trump for the harm caused,” or face legal action for $1 billion in damages.

The BBC said it would review the letter “and respond directly in due course.”

 

https://apnews.com/article/britain-bbc-crisis-trump-panorama-a392fb275af25216ea23537c6f4347e4

 

NB Attorney Brito is handling the cases in Florida fed court against the Wall Street Journal and the NY Times.

  • Popular Post

BBC getting BBCed

  • Popular Post

AI quickie Gemini:

 

One piece of related information is that a BBC official noted the program had "not attracted significant audience feedback" when it first aired, though it later drew hundreds of complaints after the editing controversy was made public.

___________________

“The BBC is on notice.”

“The BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try and interfere in the Presidential Election,” a spokesman for Trump’s legal team said. “President Trump will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception, and fake news.”

 

“Due to their salacious nature, the fabricated statements that were aired by the BBC have been widely disseminated throughout various digital mediums, which have reached tens of millions of people worldwide,” Brito wrote. “Consequently, the BBC has caused President Trump to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm.”

 

https://nypost.com/2025/11/10/us-news/trump-lashes-out-at-corrupt-dishonest-bbc-after-bosses-resign-over-doctored-jan-6-speech-footage/

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

a spokesman for Trump’s legal team said. “President Trump will continue to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception, and fake news.”

 Good.

  • Popular Post

The BBC has come spectacularly unstuck, however it's bias goes far deeper and is far more extensive than their coverage of Trump's speech on January 6th 2020. For a great many years, decades really, their flagship news and current affairs outputs, namely Panorama and Question Time, have maintained editorial positions which have been hostile towards political parties and views which they dislike. That has been the case, frankly, as far back as Mrs Thatcher's government; and more recently has manifested itself in their reaction to and coverage of recent Conservative governments, Brexit and Farage and Reform UK.

 

I welcome their embarrassment, both deserved and damaging to a domestic and international reputation which they have long cynically sheltered behind. A major review and restructuring of their management and productions is long overdue, although I am sceptical about it's outcome - I rather expect more of the same - nothing will change until their generous, apparently untouchable and largely unaccountable public funding through the license fee is reformed.

 

That said, I don't think a foreign potentate should be able to hold them to ransom by threatening to sue for vast sums of money in a foreign court. Even if a Florida Court were to award Trump massive damages, would they be enforceable? The program was made and broadcast in the UK, by a British undertaking. I really don't see why a Florida court should have jurisdiction. Any attempt to win legal redress ( if appropriate) should be made through the British courts.

  • Popular Post

Good, bankrupt them

  • Popular Post

Why not a trillion dollars Trump?

 

 

  • Popular Post
18 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:

Good, bankrupt them

lol and how would one manage that when they’re publicly funded? They need to be brought down a peg and embarrassed—and be IMPARTIAL like it used to be—but stuff like this conveniently takes away from current affairs like Epstein. 

  • Popular Post
17 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

Why not a trillion dollars Trump?

 

 

Well it is a "Donnie cash grab", and one has to be vaguely reasonable in such matters.

 

I trust  Trump attorney Alejandro Brito has negotiated payment of at least a portion of his no doubt substantial fee "up front" - Mr Trump has a certain reputation when it comes to paying his lawyers!

  • Popular Post

This is utter nonsense. The British courts rarely award anything over a million on these type of matters. Talk of billions in the UK is utterly ridiculous. 

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, webfact said:

This follows a leaked memo from former BBC adviser Michael Prescott, which claims that the Panorama program distorted Trump's words to suggest he incited the Capitol Hill riots.

Well he did.

 

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Trump's legal team is demanding the retraction of the documentary, an official apology, and full compensation.

Send him a boxed set of the BBC series ‘Rise of the Nazis’ and call it quits.

  • Popular Post
8 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

This is utter nonsense. The British courts rarely award anything over a million on these type of matters. Talk of billions in the UK is utterly ridiculous. 

I believe the case is to be filed in a Florida court (unless it's a bluff).  

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, Celsius said:

BBC getting BBCed

Yes its great news and about time!!:clap2:

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

This is utter nonsense. The British courts rarely award anything over a million on these type of matters. Talk of billions in the UK is utterly ridiculous. 

This is why its being filed in the US, in Florida. Trump is no fool, when it comes to suing ?😅

3 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I believe the case is to be filed in a Florida court (unless it's a bluff).  

 

 

The BBC is a british corporation. How on earth can you file in America. Not sure you understand how this works.

 

The highest ever award from the UK courts for this type of compensation has been around a few hundred thousand. It's rare UK courts award anything like they do in America. 

  • Popular Post

It's Trump deflecting as the longest shutdown in US government history comes to an end and Epstein is on the radar again. The BBC made an "error of judgement" but rejected bias claims, they rearranged the words but Trumps meaning never changed, and emphasized impartiality; with Davie and Turness already resigned, further concessions seem unnecessary. As public-service opinion journalism protected under free speech (and weak U.S. merits), they'd likely defend without any grovelling or private payout to avoid precedent—echoing past stances on Trump suits.

  • Popular Post

Thanks Donald. 

 

Sue them out of existence. It's long overdue. 

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Sue them out of existence.

Sue them on what basis? Not meeting your political agenda? Don't think that will stand up in court.

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, WorriedNoodle said:

Sue them on what basis? Not meeting your political agenda? Don't think that will stand up in court.

 

Ummm, did you read the OP?

 

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Donald Trump is threatening the BBC with a hefty $1bn (approximately 36 billion Baht) lawsuit over allegations that a speech he made was improperly edited in a documentary.

 

Seems he has a pretty solid case seeing as the BBC already admitted to it. 

  • Popular Post
17 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

 

 

The BBC is a british corporation. How on earth can you file in America. Not sure you understand how this works.

 

The highest ever award from the UK courts for this type of compensation has been around a few hundred thousand. It's rare UK courts award anything like they do in America. 

Wrong—the BBC broadcast its fabricated Panorama hit piece worldwide, including via BBC America, iPlayer, and online streams accessible in the US, causing direct harm to a US president in Florida.

reuters.com

Trump’s lawyers already invoked Florida defamation law in their Nov 10 letter, demanding retraction or a $1bn lawsuit—filed in US courts, where BBC has assets, offices, and massive American viewership.

  • Popular Post
15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Thanks Donald. 

 

Sue them out of existence. It's long overdue. 

When I first came to these tropical shores, I used to get my news from the BBC. Then they just started lying.

 

Do they still force people to pay for it over in Blighty?

  • Popular Post

The BBC made a mistake. But to suggest they are left wing is utterly ridiculous. They platform Reform UK on their main channels weekly, and they only have 5 seats. They were the same during Brexit, utterly ridiculous. 

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

 Good.

Except trump the biggest liar ever hands down….personally I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if there was trade tariffs somehow involved with this under the surface…..it just reeks of extortion and that friends is Donnie’s favorite MO….well that and being a bully under color of authority.

  • Popular Post
19 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Thanks Donald. 

 

Sue them out of existence. It's long overdue. 

 

Yes, well done Trump!

  • Popular Post
Just now, Yagoda said:

When I first came to these tropical shores, I used to get my news from the BBC. Then they just started lying.

 

Do they still force people to pay for it over in Blighty?

 

Yes unfortunately they still extort money from the British public in order to pay for documentaries that deliberately mislead them in order to support their left wing political agenda.

 

It's like something from the soviet era. It's actually pretty repulsive. 

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

Wrong—the BBC broadcast its fabricated Panorama hit piece worldwide, including via BBC America, iPlayer, and online streams accessible in the US, causing direct harm to a US president in Florida.

reuters.com

Trump’s lawyers already invoked Florida defamation law in their Nov 10 letter, demanding retraction or a $1bn lawsuit—filed in US courts, where BBC has assets, offices, and massive American viewership.

 

Yes, well done Trump!

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes unfortunately they still extort money from the British public in order to pay for documentaries that deliberately mislead them in order to support their left wing political agenda.

 

It's like something from the soviet era. It's actually pretty repulsive. 

Can they arrest you for not paying?

 

It makes me think of William Hurt doing compulsory exercises in front of the T V a run down flat before he goes to work to change yesterdays history.

 

 

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Can they arrest you for not paying?

 

It makes me think of William Hurt doing compulsory exercises in front of the T V a run down flat before he goes to work to change yesterdays history.

 

 

 

Yes you can be taken to court and fined.

 

If you do not pay the fine you can be jailed. 

 

Absolutely disgusting extortion to pay for left wing propaganda that most Brits don't even want. Defund the lying grifters. 

  • Popular Post
4 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

Wrong—the BBC broadcast its fabricated Panorama hit piece worldwide, including via BBC America, iPlayer, and online streams accessible in the US, causing direct harm to a US president in Florida.

reuters.com

Trump’s lawyers already invoked Florida defamation law in their Nov 10 letter, demanding retraction or a $1bn lawsuit—filed in US courts, where BBC has assets, offices, and massive American viewership.

Complete nonsense by the Trump lawyers playing the Austin Powers gazzilion dollars game to deflect. The BBC made a mistake in rearranging Trumps words in a Panorama program, but thats their right in a free speech world where opinion pieces are still allowed in free democracies. The program is no longer broadcast as a gesture, but the message was never changed. Trump has always been a serial liar, called for an insurrection and the message from the Panorama program told the same home truths despite screwing up the process at the same time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.