House Democrats have unveiled a new set of photographs from the estate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, showing former presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton among other high-profile figures. The images, released as part of an oversight committee review, have reignited scrutiny of Epstein’s connections with powerful individuals. 

 

The first batch of 19 photos was made public by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee after the panel received nearly 100,000 images from Epstein’s estate. Some pictures show Trump with unnamed women and Epstein at social events, while others feature Clinton with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. 

 

 

 

 

Also depicted in the released photographs are figures such as Steve Bannon, Bill Gates, Woody Allen and Richard Branson, underscoring the breadth of Epstein’s social circle. One image of Clinton appears to be autographed. 

 

Democrats described the photos as “disturbing” and said they raise further questions about Epstein’s associations with wealthy and influential people. Committee members called for transparency and justice for Epstein’s victims as they continue to review additional material. 

 

Republicans and the White House pushed back, accusing Democrats of selectively releasing images to generate political headlines and asserting that no wrongdoing is shown. The White House maintained that the administration has supported efforts to provide information to Epstein’s victims. 

 

The release comes amid ongoing legal and legislative actions tied to Epstein’s files. A bipartisan law signed recently requires the Department of Justice to make hundreds of thousands of pages of related documents public by 19 December. More photos and documents are expected to emerge as redaction and review processes continue. 

 

Key Takeaways

 

• Democrats released 19 photographs from Epstein’s estate featuring Trump, Clinton and other prominent figures.

 

• The images have intensified debate over Epstein’s network and calls for transparency.

 

**• Republicans argue the release is politically motivated and maintain it shows no wrongdoing.**

 

Adapted From 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/12/epstein-photos-trump-clinton

why would woody allen need to partake in this nonsense when he is already married to a much younger woman? 

 

37 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

why would woody allen need to partake in this nonsense when he is already married to a much younger woman? 

 

He was a neighbour of Epstein's.  His wife was a close friend of Epstein's too.

39 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

why would woody allen need to partake in this nonsense when he is already married to a much younger woman? 

 

She was young enough to be his daughter.......oh wait.....

Just now, brewsterbudgen said:

He was a neighbour of Epstein's.  His wife was a close friend of Epstein's too.

Just socializing with Epstein does not mean guilt of crimes.

He socialized a lot with rich and famous people.

But the thing with Trump is that he was BEST FRIENDS with Epstein for MANY YEARS.

Which to be fair does NOT prove Trump was guilty of sex crimes.

But it DOES mean that there is zero doubt that he knew full well what Epstein was up to.

"The first batch of 19 photos was made public by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee after the panel received nearly 100,000 images from Epstein’s estate."

 

100,000 images and these nothingburgers are all they've got?

 

https://youtu.be/eANcbFSPHyA?si=HAjo-O1L5gG5G5r0

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

She was young enough to be his daughter.......oh wait.....

She was 21, so yes she would have been young enough, although they didn't marry until she was 27.

2 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

She was 21, so yes she would have been young enough, although they didn't marry until she was 27.

It was his step daughter wasn't it?

From the released pics:

A seri

1 minute ago, gargamon said:

From the released pics:

 

A series of 23 photos on CNN. All useless on purpose.

 

They were ALL on it.

Not a good look for the con man grifter. A statutory sort of guy also? Very possible. 

 

 

27 minutes ago, Celsius said:

series of 23 photos on CNN.

Trump has not yet got control of CNN so it's still believable.

Guilt by association rather than evidence of guilt. 

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Just socializing with Epstein does not mean guilt of crimes.

He socialized a lot with rich and famous people.

But the thing with Trump is that he was BEST FRIENDS with Epstein for MANY YEARS.

Which to be fair does NOT prove Trump was guilty of sex crimes.

But it DOES mean that there is zero doubt that he knew full well what Epstein was up to.

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

Just now, dinsdale said:

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

Did he, is that what you heard from Trump...............................🤭

 

"They're eating the cats", did you believe that too.............🤣

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

close the barn door after the horses are gone comes to mind.....

1 minute ago, pomchop said:

close the barn door after the horses are gone comes to mind.....

 

I heard Bubba was still inside

11 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Guilt by association rather than evidence of illegality. 

Know them by the company they keep .

All deep fakers and homasexuals... foolin the people.

 

You better wake yer a$$ up.

12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

Trump didn't kick him out of mar-lardo. Epstein was never a member. My guess is tRump gave him free access because of al the ”perks“ he was getting.

16 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

Except that’s not the truth of it.

 

Trump continued his ‘friendship’ with Epstein.

Let’s have the Epstein files, all of them.

 

Release the files and let the chips fall as they will.

 

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

 

To be fair, some very cute ladies there. I certainly wouldn’t be climbing over em to get to ol Donny. 

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

It was his step daughter wasn't it?

No. This is a false statement that was circulated by Mia Farrow. The facts are;

-Soon Yi was adopted by Mia Farrow and Andre Previn. 

-Woody Allen was NEVER married to Mia Farrow and although they had a social relationship, they lived in separate residences. 

- Allen started a relationship with Soon Yi when she was 21/22 in 1992.

- Allen and Previn were married in 1997. Now married for 28 years, longer than Mia Farrow could ever maintain a relationship.

Mia Farrow has been spreading stories about Woody Allen ever since he ended his relationship with her., none of which were corroborated.

27 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I agree with your post except for the last sentence. This is just speculation. Remember Trump kicked Epstein out and ended the friendship.

Absolutely correct!

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after hearing rumors about underage girls, calling him a "creep."

 

"Zero doubt he knew what Epstein was up to"? Zero evidence – Epstein's crimes (trafficking ring exposed 2005–2019) happened after their fallout, and no docs, tapes, or witnesses link Trump to the island, flights, or victims (unlike Clinton's 26 Lolita rides).

 

 

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except that’s not the truth of it.

 

 

If Trump "knew full well," why ban him in 2004? Your "guilt by socializing" logic? Apply it to Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, or the dozens of elites who partied harder – but nah, selective outrage for Trump.Bottom line: Shallow acquaintance, not BFFs – and no proof of knowledge or involvement.

Let’s have the Epstein files, all of them.

 

Release the files and let the chips fall as they will.

 

No its the truth, of course if you have evidence, lets see it?

 

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Just socializing with Epstein does not mean guilt of crimes.

He socialized a lot with rich and famous people.

But the thing with Trump is that he was BEST FRIENDS with Epstein for MANY YEARS.

Which to be fair does NOT prove Trump was guilty of sex crimes.

But it DOES mean that there is zero doubt that he knew full well what Epstein was up to.

If Trump "knew full well," why ban him in 2004? Your "guilt by socializing" logic? Apply it to Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, or the dozens of elites who partied harder – but nah, selective outrage for Trump.Bottom line: Shallow acquaintance, not BFFs – and no proof of knowledge or involvement.

2 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

If Trump "knew full well," why ban him in 2004?

 

That has been answered by his former fixer Cohen ages ago. Surprised you missed that

The Epstein photos prove nothing except that Epstein was a master schemer.  The photos were his get out of jail card, his insurance policy against being held accountable. He gathered incriminating information that he could use against people. He was a master sales man and manipulator.

 

I know it is difficult for many people to fully comprehend what was going on and it is because they have never met people like this or been exposed to the web of deceit that they weave. The underlying motive is to be able to say, I wasn't alone, everybody knew and if I am going down, I am taking alot of you people with me. This is how marginal people get ahead. They have good sales skills and are able to play upon the gullibility of others. They are the social organizers, the person who always has something on the go.  

 

The wealthy and the successful are often isolated and lonely. They work hard and few people understand them. Along comes an Epstein who can exploit their weakness, play to their vanity and offer a way to secure their wealth, all within the safety of being with others in a similar situation. The marks get lulled into a sense of security. If Bill Gates is ok with him, then surely I should be too. If he knows a wheeler dealer like Trump, then he must know other important people etc. It's a Pyramid Scheme for the  wealthy, and like all Pyramid schemes it eventually collapses and it always leaves a mess behind.

 

 

17 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

That has been answered by his former fixer Cohen ages ago. Surprised you missed that

 

Hah, "answered by his former fixer Cohen ages ago"?

 

You mean the convicted felon, disbarred lawyer, and admitted perjurer who flipped on Trump for a plea deal and now hawks anti-Trump books like a carnival barker?

Cohen's 2024 hush-money trial ramblings – claiming the 2004 Mar-a-Lago ban was "solely over a real estate spat," not Epstein's creepiness – are as credible as his "I lied to Congress" confession (2018 guilty plea for tax evasion, bank fraud, campaign violations).

Cohen's a walking contradiction: He swore under oath Trump "knew nothing" about Epstein's crimes in 2019 depositions, then flipped the script for revenge post-firing. "Knew full well"? Zero proof – no docs, witnesses, or evidence link Trump to the island or victims, unlike Clinton's 26 Lolita rides.

If Cohen's your "ages ago" oracle, surprise: He's a bitter has-been whose "testimony" got shredded in cross-exam (jury instructions called him "unreliable").

Trump's ban in 2004? Pre-Epstein's 2005 exposure – he cut ties early over rumors, not "full knowledge." Your "gotcha" is a dud from a dud witness. Keep grasping at Cohen straws; the rest of us see the vendetta.

27 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

No. This is a false statement that was circulated by Mia Farrow. The facts are;

-Soon Yi was adopted by Mia Farrow and Andre Previn. 

-Woody Allen was NEVER married to Mia Farrow and although they had a social relationship, they lived in separate residences. 

- Allen started a relationship with Soon Yi when she was 21/22 in 1992.

- Allen and Previn were married in 1997. Now married for 28 years, longer than Mia Farrow could ever maintain a relationship.

Mia Farrow has been spreading stories about Woody Allen ever since he ended his relationship with her., none of which were corroborated.

That's splitting hairs.