8.6M views · 451K reactions | We pranked Trump supporters...

We pranked Trump supporters in South Carolina!

It's hilarious, yet worrying at the same time, how easily people will change their opinion from condemnation to forgiveness .

38 minutes ago, bannork said:

It's hilarious, yet worrying at the same time, how easily people will change their opinion from condemnation to forgiveness .

Lots of videos online with this exact same concept but the other way around. Please post some of those as well. I dare you.

5 hours ago, blaze master said:

Lots of videos online with this exact same concept but the other way around. Please post some of those as well. I dare you.

Come on bm, I don't know where these videos with the same concept the other way round are. You do, so please post a few.

8 minutes ago, bannork said:

Come on bm, I don't know where these videos with the same concept the other way round are. You do, so please post a few.

Will do....

I could post many more but hope this helps.

45 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Will do....

I could post many more but hope this helps.

There's a difference between the examples you posted and mine.

In your examples nearly all the interviewees don't go on to defend Biden or Obama when they find out the quotes are actually not Trump's, but in the OP the interviewees actually change their opinion.

The first lady is hilarious, justifying shining a white light to cure Covid when it's Donald's idea, and then opining flat feet making for a poor soldier, which will affect his fellow soldiers too!

7 hours ago, bannork said:

It's hilarious, yet worrying at the same time, how easily people will change their opinion from condemnation to forgiveness .

Humans are mostly stupid. My IQ is 137. Not 1 person has proved me wrong on here in 500 arguments.

12 vs 1 I still win 100%.

6 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Humans are mostly stupid. My IQ is 137. Not 1 person has proved me wrong on here in 500 arguments.

12 vs 1 I still win 100%.

6:30am hopped up and attacking the forum with pure drivel. Could be a long day today. Going out for a nice run you have a good one BM.

4 minutes ago, marin said:

6:30am hopped up and attacking the forum with pure drivel. Could be a long day today. Going out for a nice run you have a good one BM.

Run Forest run. That is cool.

27 minutes ago, bannork said:

There's a difference between the examples you posted and mine.

In your examples nearly all the interviewees don't go on to defend Biden or Obama when they find out the quotes are actually not Trump's, but in the OP the interviewees actually change their opinion.

The first lady is hilarious, justifying shining a white light to cure Covid when it's Donald's idea, and then opining flat feet making for a poor soldier, which will affect his fellow soldiers too!

Trump war deaths are low. The main role is too avoid war.

29 minutes ago, bannork said:

There's a difference between the examples you posted and mine.

In your examples nearly all the interviewees don't go on to defend Biden or Obama when they find out the quotes are actually not Trump's, but in the OP the interviewees actually change their opinion.

The first lady is hilarious, justifying shining a white light to cure Covid when it's Donald's idea, and then opining flat feet making for a poor soldier, which will affect his fellow soldiers too!

The concept is the same.

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Humans are mostly stupid. My IQ is 137. Not 1 person has proved me wrong on here in 500 arguments.

12 vs 1 I still win 100%.

That’s the problem with online unsubstantiated claims.

They can’t be proven wrong.

You claim an IQ of 137 and I say, ‘well why not, this the internet’.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

That’s the problem with online unsubstantiated claims.

They can’t be proven wrong.

You claim an IQ of 137 and I say, ‘well why not, this the internet’.

You ought to be ashamed. 33% strike rate on US elections. I would give up if I was you.

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

You ought to be ashamed. 33% strike rate on US elections. I would give up if I was you.

How on earth did you come to that conclusion?

Every US election since you joined the forum has been a resounding success for the Democrats.

Or did your 137 IQ fail to workout that you either made an obviously unsubstantiated claim, or you exposed more evidence that you’re a reincarnation of some previous forum member?!

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How on earth did you come to that conclusion?

Every US election since you joined the forum has been a resounding success for the Democrats.

Or did your 137 IQ fail to workout that you either made an obviously unsubstantiated claim, or you exposed more evidence that you’re a reincarnation of some previous forum member?!

2016 wrong

2020 right

2024 wrong

You are at 33%

16 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

2016 wrong

2020 right

2024 wrong

You are at 33%

I don’t think you’ll find any post from me predicting those election results.

Maybe it’s something you ‘mis-remembered’.

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t think you’ll find any post from me predicting those election results.

Maybe it’s something you ‘mis-remembered’.

Clever by now saying

4 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Clever by now saying

You make claims, you back them up.

Or is that something else your 137 IQ fails to grasp?

H

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You make claims, you back them up.

Or is that something else your 137 IQ fails to grasp?

So you picked Trump both times?

My mistake. Your record is 100%.

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You make claims, you back them up.

Or is that something else your 137 IQ fails to grasp?

Who did you pick in 2000 and 2004?

10 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

H

So you picked Trump both times?

My mistake. Your record is 100%.

And now your 137 IQ demonstrates the logical fallacy of the non sequitur.

Was there a decimal place on your IQ score?

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

And now your 137 IQ demonstrates the logical fallacy of the non sequitur.

Was there a decimal place on your IQ score?

Keep dodging the question champ. On an anonymous forum too. Strange.

I picked Gore in 2000. Been right everytime since.

20 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Who did you pick in 2000 and 2004?

Now you demonstrate the high IQ debating technique of first making an unsubstantiated claim about a person then asking the same person to provide you with the evidence to substantiate your claim.

Interesting thread.

Yanks 'going at it' to prove to each other how stupid Yanks are.

Keep it coming.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Now you demonstrate the high IQ debating technique of first making an unsubstantiated claim about a person then asking the same person to provide you with the evidence to substantiate your claim.

Why dodge questions on an anonymous forum? Very strange.

I think you are weird.

10 minutes ago, MIke B Bad said:

Interesting thread.

Yanks 'going at it' to prove to each other how stupid Yanks are.

Keep it coming.

I dont believe Harrisfan is a Yank, I have asked him numerous times, also asking where he has lived in the US. He has never answered.

10 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Why dodge questions on an anonymous forum? Very strange.

I think you are weird.

Why wont you answer my simple question? It makes you weird in your own words.

1 minute ago, marin said:

I dont believe Harrisfan is a Yank, I have asked him numerous times, also asking where he has lived in the US. He has never answered.

Why wont you answer my simple question? It makes you weird in your own words.

US elections are not personal. Where you live is.

Who did you pick in 2016 and 2024?

1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

US elections are not personal. Where you live is.

Who did you pick in 2016 and 2024?

So that answer makes you a weird hypocrite. Seems about right.

Wasn't there an octopus in Germany that predicted the winner of the last World Cup before the competition started?

Wonder how he'll get on this time round? Probably not relevant but it's 'Sharing Sunday'😁

1 minute ago, marin said:

So that answer makes you a weird hypocrite. Seems about right.

The topic is politics not where you live. Your response is irrational.

My guess is most lefties picked against Trump both times. Danderman said Kamala wins by 9 points.